Search

Objective: We assessed the impact of treatment preferences in second-line chemotherapy on breast cancer prognosis using the SELECT BC study. Methods: The SELECT BC study was performed in patients with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer treated with initial chemotherapy. From these patients, 618 were assigned to 2 groups (S-1 group, 309; taxane group, 309). The S-1 and taxane groups were each subdivided into 3 groups: crossover group, protocol-recommended group, and other group, and the analysis of overall survival (OS) was performed using Cox regression with inverse probability weighting, to adjust for postrandomization confounding. Results: In the taxane group, the OS of the crossover group (39.6 months) was better than that of the protocol-recommended group (35.7 months) and the other chemotherapy group (36.9 months) (vs. the protocolrecommended group, HR 0.72 [95% CI 0.52-0.98], p = 0.037; vs. the other chemotherapy group, HR 0.71 [95% CI 0.43-1.18], p = 0.183). In the S-1 group, there was no statistically significant difference in OS between the 3 groups. Conclusion: The study of the combination of first-line chemotherapy and second-line chemotherapy showed that S-1 might be recommended as a second-line chemotherapy in patients in whom taxane was the primary chemotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To evaluate the effects of S-1, an orally administered 5-FU agent, versus taxane on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in the SELECT BC trial. Methods: Patients with HER2-negative and endocrine treatment-resistant breast cancer with metastasis or recurrence after surgery were randomly assigned to receive first-line taxane or S-1. PROs (secondary endpoint) were assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and Patient Neurotoxicity Questionnaire (PNQ) at baseline and at 3, 6, and 12 months. We conducted a responder analysis for the QLQ-C30 and PNQ and created cumulative distribution function (CDF) plots as a sensitivity analysis. Results: The questionnaire response rates were over 80% from 386 patients, who completed at least one baseline questionnaire. S-1 was significantly superior to taxane with respect to 6 scales (physical functioning [p = 0.03], role functioning [p = 0.04], social functioning [p < 0.01], financial difficulties [p = 0.01], global health status [p = 0.02], and constipation [p < 0.01]) and sensory neuropathy (p = 0.01). The CDF plots partially supported the conclusions and their robustness. Conclusion: First-line S-1 therapy has clinical benefits with respect to many aspects of health-related quality of life for metastatic breast cancer patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]