6 results on '"Askautrud, Hanne A"'
Search Results
2. Corrigendum to “Cabazitaxel-loaded Poly(2-ethylbutyl cyanoacrylate) nanoparticles improve treatment efficacy in a patient derived breast cancer xenograft”, [Journal of Control Release, 293 (2019) 183–192]
- Author
-
Fusser, Markus, Øverbye, Anders, Pandya, Abhilash D., Mørch, Ýrr, Borgos, Sven Even, Kildal, Wanja, Snipstad, Sofie, Sulheim, Einar, Fleten, Karianne Giller, Askautrud, Hanne Arenberg, Engebraaten, Olav, Flatmark, Kjersti, Iversen, Tore Geir, Sandvig, Kirsten, Skotland, Tore, and Mælandsmo, Gunhild M.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Prognostic value of mitotic checkpoint protein BUB3, cyclin B1, and pituitary tumor-transforming 1 expression in prostate cancer.
- Author
-
Ersvær, Elin, Kildal, Wanja, Vlatkovic, Ljiljana, Cyll, Karolina, Pradhan, Manohar, Kleppe, Andreas, Hveem, Tarjei S., Askautrud, Hanne A., Novelli, Marco, Wæhre, Håkon, Liestøl, Knut, and Danielsen, Håvard E.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. A clinical decision support system optimising adjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal cancers by integrating deep learning and pathological staging markers: a development and validation study.
- Author
-
Kleppe, Andreas, Skrede, Ole-Johan, De Raedt, Sepp, Hveem, Tarjei S, Askautrud, Hanne A, Jacobsen, Jørn E, Church, David N, Nesbakken, Arild, Shepherd, Neil A, Novelli, Marco, Kerr, Rachel, Liestøl, Knut, Kerr, David J, and Danielsen, Håvard E
- Subjects
- *
CLINICAL decision support systems , *TUMOR classification , *CANCER chemotherapy , *COLORECTAL cancer , *ADJUVANT chemotherapy , *CANCER education , *PROGNOSIS , *RESEARCH funding - Abstract
Background: The DoMore-v1-CRC marker was recently developed using deep learning and conventional haematoxylin and eosin-stained tissue sections, and was observed to outperform established molecular and morphological markers of patient outcome after primary colorectal cancer resection. The aim of the present study was to develop a clinical decision support system based on DoMore-v1-CRC and pathological staging markers to facilitate individualised selection of adjuvant treatment.Methods: We estimated cancer-specific survival in subgroups formed by pathological tumour stage (pT<4 or pT4), pathological nodal stage (pN0, pN1, or pN2), number of lymph nodes sampled (≤12 or >12) if not pN2, and DoMore-v1-CRC classification (good, uncertain, or poor prognosis) in 997 patients with stage II or III colorectal cancer considered to have no residual tumour (R0) from two community-based cohorts in Norway and the UK, and used these data to define three risk groups. An external cohort of 1075 patients with stage II or III R0 colorectal cancer from the QUASAR 2 trial was used for validation; these patients were treated with single-agent capecitabine. The proposed risk stratification system was evaluated using Cox regression analysis. We similarly evaluated a risk stratification system intended to reflect current guidelines and clinical practice. The primary outcome was cancer-specific survival.Findings: The new risk stratification system provided a hazard ratio of 10·71 (95% CI 6·39-17·93; p<0·0001) for high-risk versus low-risk patients and 3·06 (1·73-5·42; p=0·0001) for intermediate versus low risk in the primary analysis of the validation cohort. Estimated 3-year cancer-specific survival was 97·2% (95% CI 95·1-98·4; n=445 [41%]) for the low-risk group, 94·8% (91·7-96·7; n=339 [32%]) for the intermediate-risk group, and 77·6% (72·1-82·1; n=291 [27%]) for the high-risk group. The guideline-based risk grouping was observed to be less prognostic and informative (the low-risk group comprised only 142 [13%] of the 1075 patients).Interpretation: Integrating DoMore-v1-CRC and pathological staging markers provided a clinical decision support system that risk stratifies more accurately than its constituent elements, and identifies substantially more patients with stage II and III colorectal cancer with similarly good prognosis as the low-risk group in current guidelines. Avoiding adjuvant chemotherapy in these patients might be safe, and could reduce morbidity, mortality, and treatment costs.Funding: The Research Council of Norway. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. Impact of molecular profile on prognosis and relapse pattern in low and intermediate risk endometrial cancer.
- Author
-
Lindemann, Kristina, Kildal, Wanja, Kleppe, Andreas, Tobin, Kari Anne R., Pradhan, Manohar, Isaksen, Maria X., Vlatkovic, Ljiljana, Danielsen, Håvard E., Kristensen, Gunnar B., and Askautrud, Hanne A.
- Subjects
- *
RETROSPECTIVE studies , *MOLECULAR biology , *DISEASE relapse , *ENDOMETRIAL tumors , *SURVIVAL analysis (Biometry) , *LONGITUDINAL method - Abstract
The role of molecular classification in patients with low/intermediate risk endometrial cancer (EC) is uncertain. Higher precision in diagnostics will inform the unsettled debate on optimal adjuvant treatment. We aimed to determine the association of molecular profiling with patterns of relapse and survival. This retrospective cohort study included patients referred to The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital from 2006–2017. Patients with low/intermediate risk EC were molecularly classified as pathogenic polymerase epsilon (POLE)-mutated, mismatch repair deficient (MMRd), p53 abnormal, or no specific molecular profile (NSMP). The main outcomes were time to recurrence (TTR) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Of 626 patients, 610 could be molecularly classified. Fifty-seven patients (9%) had POLE-mutated tumors, 202 (33%) had MMRd tumors, 34 (6%) had p53 abnormal tumors and 317 (52%) had NSMP tumors. After median follow-up time of 8.9 years, there was a statistically significant difference in TTR and CSS by molecular groups. Patients with p53 abnormal tumors had poor prognosis, with 10 of the 12 patients with relapse presenting with para-aortic/distant metastases. Patients with POLE mutations had excellent prognosis. In the NSMP group, L1CAM expression was associated with shorter CSS but not TTR. The differences in outcome by molecular groups are driven by differences in relapse frequency and -patterns and demand a higher precision in diagnostics, also in patients with low/intermediate risk EC. Tailored adjuvant treatment strategies need to consider systemic treatment for patients with p53 abnormal tumors and de-escalated treatment for patients with POLE mutated tumors. • Clarifying the role of molecular classification in low/intermediate risk endometrial cancer. • Time to relapse and survival differed signifi cantly by molecular groups. • roboPatients with p53 abnormal tumors had poor outcome. • roboPatients with POLE mutated tumors had excellent survival. • pmMolecular classification is crucial for tailoring of adjuvant treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Chromatin organisation and cancer prognosis: a pan-cancer study.
- Author
-
Kleppe, Andreas, Albregtsen, Fritz, Vlatkovic, Ljiljana, Pradhan, Manohar, Nielsen, Birgitte, Hveem, Tarjei S, Askautrud, Hanne A, Kristensen, Gunnar B, Nesbakken, Arild, Trovik, Jone, Wæhre, Håkon, Tomlinson, Ian, Shepherd, Neil A, Novelli, Marco, Kerr, David J, and Danielsen, Håvard E
- Subjects
- *
CHROMATIN , *CANCER prognosis , *GENE expression , *MACHINE learning , *CANCER invasiveness , *CELL nuclei , *CHROMOSOMES , *COLON tumors , *COMPARATIVE studies , *DEGENERATION (Pathology) , *DIAGNOSTIC imaging , *GENES , *INFORMATION science , *RESEARCH methodology , *MEDICAL cooperation , *COMPUTERS in medicine , *MICROSCOPY , *RESEARCH , *RESEARCH funding , *STAINS & staining (Microscopy) , *TUMOR classification , *EVALUATION research , *PREDICTIVE tests , *TUMOR treatment ,RECTUM tumors ,RESEARCH evaluation - Abstract
Background: Chromatin organisation affects gene expression and regional mutation frequencies and contributes to carcinogenesis. Aberrant organisation of DNA has been correlated with cancer prognosis in analyses of the chromatin component of tumour cell nuclei using image texture analysis. As yet, the methodology has not been sufficiently validated to permit its clinical application. We aimed to define and validate a novel prognostic biomarker for the automatic detection of heterogeneous chromatin organisation.Methods: Machine learning algorithms analysed the chromatin organisation in 461 000 images of tumour cell nuclei stained for DNA from 390 patients (discovery cohort) treated for stage I or II colorectal cancer at the Aker University Hospital (Oslo, Norway). The resulting marker of chromatin heterogeneity, termed Nucleotyping, was subsequently independently validated in six patient cohorts: 442 patients with stage I or II colorectal cancer in the Gloucester Colorectal Cancer Study (UK); 391 patients with stage II colorectal cancer in the QUASAR 2 trial; 246 patients with stage I ovarian carcinoma; 354 patients with uterine sarcoma; 307 patients with prostate carcinoma; and 791 patients with endometrial carcinoma. The primary outcome was cancer-specific survival.Findings: In all patient cohorts, patients with chromatin heterogeneous tumours had worse cancer-specific survival than patients with chromatin homogeneous tumours (univariable analysis hazard ratio [HR] 1·7, 95% CI 1·2-2·5, in the discovery cohort; 1·8, 1·0-3·0, in the Gloucester validation cohort; 2·2, 1·1-4·5, in the QUASAR 2 validation cohort; 3·1, 1·9-5·0, in the ovarian carcinoma cohort; 2·5, 1·8-3·4, in the uterine sarcoma cohort; 2·3, 1·2-4·6, in the prostate carcinoma cohort; and 4·3, 2·8-6·8, in the endometrial carcinoma cohort). After adjusting for established prognostic patient characteristics in multivariable analyses, Nucleotyping was prognostic in all cohorts except for the prostate carcinoma cohort (HR 1·7, 95% CI 1·1-2·5, in the discovery cohort; 1·9, 1·1-3·2, in the Gloucester validation cohort; 2·6, 1·2-5·6, in the QUASAR 2 cohort; 1·8, 1·1-3·0, for ovarian carcinoma; 1·6, 1·0-2·4, for uterine sarcoma; 1·43, 0·68-2·99, for prostate carcinoma; and 1·9, 1·1-3·1, for endometrial carcinoma). Chromatin heterogeneity was a significant predictor of cancer-specific survival in microsatellite unstable (HR 2·9, 95% CI 1·0-8·4) and microsatellite stable (1·8, 1·2-2·7) stage II colorectal cancer, but microsatellite instability was not a significant predictor of outcome in chromatin homogeneous (1·3, 0·7-2·4) or chromatin heterogeneous (0·8, 0·3-2·0) stage II colorectal cancer.Interpretation: The consistent prognostic prediction of Nucleotyping in different biological and technical circumstances suggests that the marker of chromatin heterogeneity can be reliably assessed in routine clinical practice and could be used to objectively assist decision making in a range of clinical settings. An immediate application would be to identify high-risk patients with stage II colorectal cancer who might have greater absolute benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. Clinical trials are warranted to evaluate the survival benefit and cost-effectiveness of using Nucleotyping to guide treatment decisions in multiple clinical settings.Funding: The Research Council of Norway, the South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority, the National Institute for Health Research, and the Wellcome Trust. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.