Search

Atrial fibrillation (AF) confers increased risk of stroke and other thromboembolic events, and oral anticoagulation therefore is the essential part of AF management to reduce the risk of these complications. Until recently, the vitamin K antagonists (VKAs, e.g., warfarin) were the only oral anticoagulants available, acting by decreased synthesis of vitamin K-dependent coagulation factors (II, VI, IX, and X). The VKAs had many limitations: delayed onset and prolonged offset of action, variability of anticoagulant effect among patients, multiple food and drug interactions affecting pharmacological properties of warfarin, narrow therapeutic window, and obligatory regular laboratory control, which all made warfarin "inconvenient" both for patients and clinicians. The limitations of VKAs led to development of a new class of drugs collectively defined as non-VKA oral anticoagulants (NOACs), which included direct thrombin inhibitors (dabigatran) and factor Xa inhibitors (rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban). The NOACs avoid many of the VKA drawbacks. In this review, we will focus on the current evidence justifying the use of NOACs in non-valvular AF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have changed the landscape for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF). Given the huge burden of AF in Asians, more attention to stroke prevention is clearly needed. Aiming to provide an overview and reappraisal of stroke prevention in Asians with AF, we searched MEDLINE for information on NOACs in Asians. In addition, abstracts from national and international cardiovascular meetings were studied to identify unpublished studies. In the 4 recent Phase 3 trials comparing NOACs to warfarin, a consistent pattern is evident. For efficacy endpoints in the comparison of NOACs vs warfarin, a significant reduction in stroke/systemic embolization was seen for dabigatran 150 mg [HR 0.45 (0.28-0.72)], with non-significant trends seen for lower stroke/systemic embolization with other NOACs, except edoxaban 30 mg. A similar pattern was seen for ischaemic stroke, with a significant reduction for dabigatran 150 mg [HR 0.55 (0.32-0.950]. For haemorrhagic stroke, all NOAC regimes, except rivaroxaban 20 mg, had significantly lower hazard ratios. No evidence of increased myocardial infarction was found for NOACs. All-cause mortality was significantly lowered amongst Asian patients on edoxaban 60 mg compared to warfarin [HR 0.63 (0.40-0.98)] with non-significant trends to lower mortality with dabigatran 150 mg, rivaroxaban and edoxaban 30 mg. For safety endpoints, all the NOAC regimes, except rivaroxaban 20 mg, significantly reduced major bleeding and 'all bleeding' events. Intracranial haemorrhage was consistently lowered by all NOACs. None of NOACs increased gastrointestinal bleeding. These information suggested that NOACs should be preferentially indicated for stroke prevention in Asians with AF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction The mental health prognosis following a venous thromboembolism in youth has not been investigated comprehensively. Using psychotropic drug purchase as a proxy for mental health status, we investigated this issue in a large cohort of young incident venous thromboembolism patients. Methods Using Danish nationwide administrative registries from the period 1997-2010, we identified 4,132 patients aged 13-33 years with a first-time venous thromboembolism diagnosis and no history of psychotropic drug usage. We sampled comparison cohort of random general population controls, matched individually in a 1:5 ratio based on sex and birth year. Participants were followed in prescription purchase registries for their first psychotropic drug purchase. Results Among young venous thromboembolism case cases, the 1-year risk of psychotropic drug purchase was 7.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.3, 7.9) and the 5-year risk 22.1% (95% CI 20.7, 23.5). This was substantially higher than among population controls, with 1- and 5-year risk differences relative to the controls of 4.7% (95% CI 3.9, 5.5), and 10.8% (95% CI 9.4, 12.3), respectively. Adjustment for the effects of recent pregnancy or somatic provocations attenuated risk differences to 4.1% (95% CI 3.5, 5.1) after 1 year and 9.6% (95% CI 8.3, 11.2) after 5 years. Conclusions A venous thromboembolism diagnosis in youth is associated with a poorer mental health prognosis: one in five patients are prescribed psychotropic medication within the first 5 year after diagnosis. Highlights • VTE in the young is associated with a poor mental health prognosis • 1 in 5 patients purchase psychotropic drugs within 5 years after VTE diagnosis • Among similarly aged peers, only 1 in 10 purchase psychotropics in the same period • Young VTE patients may need long-term followup with a focus on mental health. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is commonly associated with structural heart disease. Although heart failure (HF) has been proposed as a risk factor for stroke, the coexistence of the 2 diseases increases disproportionally the risk of thromboembolic events. Our objective was to conduct a systematic review to assess the effect of HF on the end points of stroke, systemic embolism (SE), or mortality in patients with AF. Methods: A literature search was performed to identify studies that examined stroke/ SE in relation to AF and HF. Overall, 405 articles satisfied the preinclusion criteria. Findings: In studies in which HF was based on a clinical diagnosis, HF independently increased stroke/ SE in 5 of 13 studies, conferring 1.6- to 3.1-fold increase in risk. When HF was defined as impaired left ventricular (LV) function on echocardiography, the additive risk was evident in 4 of 6 studies, with 1.7- to 2.6-fold increase in the risk of stroke/SE. The data about HF with preserved ejection fraction were less robust, although a recent presentation with acute decompensated HF increased the risk of stroke/SE, irrespective of ejection fraction. Implications: LV systolic impairment as identified by echocardiography is an independent risk factor for stroke/SE, although the magnitude by which it increases the risk of stroke cannot be precisely quantified. Whether a clinical diagnosis of HF is a significant risk factor remains inconclusive, although when the diagnosis is certain (recent decompensation requiring hospitalization), t does seem to be a significant risk factor irrespective of LV systolic function. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]