Search

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a well-recognized, independent risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, with elevated levels estimated to be prevalent in 20% of the population. Observational and genetic evidence strongly support a causal relationship between high plasma concentrations of Lp(a) and increased risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease–related events, such as myocardial infarction and stroke, and valvular aortic stenosis. In this scientific statement, we review an array of evidence-based considerations for testing of Lp(a) in clinical practice and the utilization of Lp(a) levels to inform treatment strategies in primary and secondary prevention. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a well-recognized, independent risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, with elevated levels estimated to be prevalent in 20% of the population. Observational and genetic evidence strongly support a causal relationship between high plasma concentrations of Lp(a) and increased risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease–related events, such as myocardial infarction and stroke, and valvular aortic stenosis. In this scientific statement, we review an array of evidence-based considerations for testing of Lp(a) in clinical practice and the utilization of Lp(a) levels to inform treatment strategies in primary and secondary prevention. • Causal association between high lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease–related events and mortality. • Laboratory methods and population-based considerations for Lp(a) cut points. • When to measure Lp(a) in adults and youth. • Treatment implications in primary and secondary prevention. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The association between thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) and cardiovascular disease has mainly been determined using clinical categories of disease. We tested the hypothesis that TSH on a continuous scale is associated with risk of atrial fibrillation (AF), myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, heart failure (HF), aortic valve stenosis (AVS), and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and whether these associations are likely to be causal. We first tested whether plasma TSH on a continuous scale was observationally associated with incident cardiovascular events in a prospective cohort study of 105,224 individuals from the Copenhagen General Population Study followed for a median 7 years. Next, we tested whether a genetic risk score weighted on TSH was associated with cardiovascular endpoints. Finally, using Mendelian randomization, we tested whether the observed associations were likely to be causal. Using restricted cubic splines, lower concentrations of TSH relative to the population median (=1.53 mIU/L) were associated with higher risk of AF, MI, stroke, HF, AVS, and MACE. Comparing individuals with TSH ≤5th percentile (≤0.54 mIU/L) versus >50th percentile (>1.53 mIU/L), hazard ratios (HRs) ranged from 1.12 (1.00–1.26) for stroke to 1.27 (1.11–1.46) for HF. Genetic risk estimates per standard deviation decrease in TSH were 1.28 (1.08–1.52) for AF, 1.35 (1.06–1.71) for MI, 1.06 (0.89–1.26) for stroke, 1.19 (0.94–1.52) for HF, 1.53 (1.03–2.26) for AVS, and 1.09 (0.97–1.23) for MACE. In 105,224 individuals from the general population low plasma TSH was observationally and genetically associated with increased risk of AF, MI, and AVS suggesting that these observations may reflect causal pathways. [Display omitted] • We tested the hypothesis that TSH was associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD). • 105,224 individuals from the general population were followed for a median of 7 years. • Observationally, TSH below the median was associated with increased risk of CVD. • Genetically, Mendelian randomization suggested possible causal associations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The PROMINENT trial, a cardiovascular outcome trial of the triglyceride- and remnant cholesterol-lowering agent pemafibrate, has shown neutral results despite reduction in plasma triglycerides and remnant cholesterol. We tested the hypothesis that absolute mass changes in remnant cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and apolipoprotein B explain the results of the PROMINENT trial. Among 108,431 individuals from the Copenhagen General Population Study (CGPS), those who met the key inclusion criteria of the PROMINENT trial were analyzed to mimic the trial design. Endpoint atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) was cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, and coronary revascularization as defined in PROMINENT. In the PROMINENT trial, treatment with pemafibrate resulted in -7 mg/dL (−0.18 mmol/L; -18 %) change in remnant cholesterol, +10 mg/dL (+0.26 mmol/L; +12 %) LDL cholesterol, and +5 mg/dL (+0.05 g/L; +5 %) apolipoprotein B. In the CGPS mimicking PROMINENT, the estimated hazard ratios for ASCVD were 0.97 (95 % confidence interval: 0.94–0.99) for a -7 mg/dL (−0.18 mmol/L) change in remnant cholesterol, 1.04 (1.01–1.07) for a +10 mg/dL (+0.26 mmol/L) change in LDL cholesterol, and 1.02 (1.01–1.03) for a +5 mg/dL (+0.05 g/L) change in apolipoprotein B. When combining absolute changes in remnant cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and apolipoprotein B, the estimated hazard ratio for ASCVD was 1.05 (0.96–1.14) in the CGPS mimicking PROMINENT compared to 1.03 (0.91–1.15) in the PROMINENT trial. Absolute mass changes in remnant cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and apolipoprotein B can explain results of the PROMINENT trial. The 3 mg/dL (0.08 mmol/L) higher total atherogenic cholesterol together with 5 mg/dL (0.05 g/L) higher apolipoprotein B seem to explain the trend toward more ASCVD in the pemafibrate arm. [Display omitted] • Absolute mass changes in remnant cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and apo B can explain results of the PROMINENT trial. • To reduce ASCVD lipid lowering drugs, total atherogenic cholesterol and total number of atherogenic particles need to be reduced. • Understanding the potential for causing ASCVD, lipoproteins should be judged by their absolute mass of cholesterol content. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Elevated remnant cholesterol causes ischemic heart disease.Objectives: We tested the hypothesis that the inclusion of elevated remnant cholesterol will lead to appropriate reclassification of individuals who later experience myocardial infarction and ischemic heart disease.Methods: For >10 years we followed up 41,928 white Danish individuals from the Copenhagen General Population Study without a history of ischemic cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and statin use. Using predefined cut points for elevated remnant cholesterol, we calculated net reclassification index (NRI) from below to above 5%, 7.5%, and/or 10% 10-year occurrence of myocardial infarction and ischemic heart disease defined as a composite of death from ischemic heart disease, myocardial infarction, and coronary revascularization.Results: For individuals with remnant cholesterol levels ≥95th percentile (≥1.6 mmol/L, 61 mg/dL), 23% (P < 0.001) of myocardial infarction and 21% (P < 0.001) of ischemic heart disease were reclassified correctly from below to above 5% for 10-year occurrence when remnant cholesterol levels were added to models based on conventional risk factors, whereas no events were reclassified incorrectly. Consequently, the addition of remnant cholesterol levels yielded NRI of 10% (95% CI: 1%-20%) for myocardial infarction and 5% (95% CI: -3% to 13%) for ischemic heart disease. Correspondingly, when reclassifications were combined from below to above 5%, 7.5%, and 10% risk of events, 42% (P < 0.001) of individuals with myocardial infarction and 41% (P < 0.001) with ischemic heart disease were reclassified appropriately, leading to NRI of respectively 20% (95% CI: 9%-31%) and 11% (95% CI: 2%-21%).Conclusions: Elevated remnant cholesterol levels considerably improve myocardial infarction and ischemic heart disease risk prediction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide and challenges the capacity of health care systems globally. Atherosclerosis is the underlying pathophysiological entity in two-thirds of patients with CVD. When considering that atherosclerosis develops over decades, there is potentially great opportunity for prevention of associated events such as myocardial infarction and stroke. Subclinical atherosclerosis has been identified in its early stages in young individuals; however, there is no consensus on how to prevent progression to symptomatic disease. Given the growing burden of CVD, a paradigm shift is required—moving from late management of atherosclerotic CVD to earlier detection during the subclinical phase with the goal of potential cure or prevention of events. Studies must focus on how precision medicine using imaging and circulating biomarkers may identify atherosclerosis earlier and determine whether such a paradigm shift would lead to overall cost savings for global health. [Display omitted] • Early-stage subclinical atherosclerosis can be identified in young individuals, but evidence-based strategies are needed to prevent progression of disease and clinical events. • Precision medicine using imaging and circulating biomarkers could facilitate early identification of atherosclerosis and the development of curative interventions. • A paradigm shift based on these principles could reduce the global burden of CVD with enormous implications for population health. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Elevated remnant cholesterol and low-grade inflammation each cause atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD); however, it is unknown whether joint elevation of both factors confers the highest risk. We tested the hypothesis that dual elevated remnant cholesterol and low-grade inflammation marked by elevated C-reactive protein is associated with the highest risk of myocardial infarction, ASCVD, and all-cause mortality. The Copenhagen General Population Study randomly recruited white Danish individuals aged 20–100 years in 2003–2015 and followed them for a median 9.5 years. ASCVD was cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, and coronary revascularization. In 103,221 individuals, we observed 2,454 (2.4%) myocardial infarctions, 5,437 (5.3%) ASCVD events, and 10,521 (10.2%) deaths. The hazard ratios increased with each of stepwise higher remnant cholesterol and stepwise higher C-reactive protein. In individuals with the highest tertile of both remnant cholesterol and C-reactive protein compared to individuals with the lowest tertile of both, the multivariable adjusted hazard ratios were 2.2 (95%CI:1.9–2.7) for myocardial infarction, 1.9 (1.7–2.2) for ASCVD, and 1.4 (1.3–1.5) for all-cause mortality. Corresponding values for only the highest tertile of remnant cholesterol were 1.6 (1.5–1.8), 1.4 (1.3–1.5), and 1.1 (1.0–1.1), and those for only the highest tertile of C-reactive protein were 1.7 (1.5–1.8), 1.6 (1.5–1.7), and 1.3 (1.3–1.4), respectively. There was no statistical evidence for interaction between elevated remnant cholesterol and elevated C-reactive protein on risk of myocardial infarction (p = 0.10), ASCVD (p = 0.40), or all-cause mortality (p = 0.74). Dual elevated remnant cholesterol and C-reactive protein confers the highest risk of myocardial infarction, ASCVD, and all-cause mortality, that is, compared to either of these two factors individually. [Display omitted] • Dual elevated remnant-C and CRP was associated with the highest risk of ASCVD. • ASCVD risk is particularly relevant if remnant-C is ≥ 0.8 mmol/L and CRP ≥1.5 mg/L. • ASCVD risk was double in the highest tertile of both compared to the lowest. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and aims Triglyceride-rich lipoproteins are causally associated with high risk of ischemic heart disease (IHD), and apolipoprotein E (apoE) has a central role in their plasma clearance. While both quantitative and qualitative changes of apoE are established causes of rare dyslipidemia syndromes, it remains unclear whether plasma levels of apoE are associated with risk of IHD in the general population. Methods We tested whether plasma levels of apoE at enrollment were associated with future risk of IHD and myocardial infarction (MI) in 91,695 individuals from the general population. Results Multifactorially adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for highest versus lowest apoE tertile were 1.15 (1.04–1.27) for IHD and 1.16 (1.00–1.36) for MI in men, and 0.94 (0.84–1.05) and 1.04 (0.85–1.26) in women. These associations were attenuated by adjustments for triglyceride levels. Corresponding HRs for highest versus lowest apoE tertile in ε33 carriers were 1.18 (1.03–1.36) for IHD and 1.21 (0.98–1.49) for MI in men, and 0.91 (0.78–1.06) and 0.93 (0.71–1.21) in women. Thus, the present associations were independent of APOE genotype. Conclusion These findings suggest that high plasma levels of apoE are associated with IHD in men but not in women. Triglyceride-rich lipoproteins may partly explain these associations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Plasma apolipoprotein B (apoB) is a composite measure of all apoB-containing lipoproteins causing atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease; however, it is unclear which fraction of risk is explained by cholesterol and triglycerides, respectively, in very low-density lipoproteins (VLDLs).Objectives: The authors tested the hypothesis that VLDL cholesterol and triglycerides each explain part of the myocardial infarction risk from apoB-containing lipoproteins.Methods: Nested within 109,751 individuals from the Copenhagen General Population Study, the authors examined 25,480 subjects free of lipid-lowering therapy and myocardial infarction at study entry. All had measurements of plasma apoB (quantitating number of apoB-containing lipoproteins) and cholesterol and triglyceride content of VLDL, intermediate-density lipoproteins (IDLs), and low-density lipoproteins (LDLs).Results: During a median 11 years of follow-up, 1,816 were diagnosed with myocardial infarction. Per 1-mmol/l higher levels, multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios for myocardial infarction were 2.07 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.81 to 2.36) for VLDL cholesterol, 1.19 (95% CI: 1.14 to 1.25) for VLDL triglycerides, 5.38 (95% CI: 3.73 to 7.75) for IDL cholesterol, and 1.86 (95% CI: 1.62 to 2.14) for LDL cholesterol. Per 1-g/l higher plasma apoB, the corresponding value was 2.21 (95% CI: 1.90 to 2.58). In a step-up Cox regression, risk factors for myocardial infarction entered by importance as VLDL cholesterol, systolic blood pressure, smoking, and IDL + LDL cholesterol, whereas VLDL triglycerides did not enter the model. VLDL cholesterol explained 50% and IDL + LDL cholesterol 29% of the risk of myocardial infarction from apoB-containing lipoproteins, whereas VLDL triglycerides did not explain risk.Conclusions: VLDL cholesterol explained one-half of the myocardial infarction risk from elevated apoB-containing lipoproteins, whereas VLDL triglycerides did not explain risk. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Smoking causes cardiovascular disease. AHRR hypomethylation at the cg05575921 site is associated with active and former smoking status at baseline, and cumulative amount of tobacco smoked. We tested the hypothesis that AHRR cg05575921 hypomethylation as an epigenetic marker of smoking history predicts the risk of myocardial infarction in former smokers. We included 10,510 individuals with methylation extent measurements and information on smoking status from the Copenhagen City Heart Study (CCHS), a prospective, cohort study of the general population carried out from 1991 to 2003. The endpoint myocardial infarction was retrieved from the national Danish Patient Registry and the national Danish Causes of Death Registry. For individuals in the 1st (lowest) quartile of AHRR cg05575921 methylation (≤49% methylation extent), 99% were ever smokers at baseline (active and former smokers combined) compared to 42% in the 4th (highest) quartile (>62% methylation extent). For former smokers, the cumulative incidence of myocardial infarction was higher in the lowest methylation extent (1st-50th percentile) compared to the highest methylation extent (51st-100th percentile). Compared to never smokers, the multivariable adjusted subhazard ratio for myocardial infarction was 1.09 (95%CI:0.88–1.35) for former smokers with the highest methylation degree, 1.38 (1.06–1.80) for active smokers with the highest methylation extent, 1.39 (1.08–1.78) for former smokers with the lowest methylation extent, and 1.61 (1.35–1.92) for active smokers with the lowest methylation extent. AHRR cg05575921 hypomethylation as an epigenetic marker of smoking history predicts risk of myocardial infarction, particularly in former smokers. Further, AHRR hypomethylation, regardless of smoking status, was associated with increased risk of myocardial infarction. Image 1 • AHRR cg05575921 hypomethylation is an epigenetic marker of smoking history. • AHRR cg05575921 hypomethylation predicted risk of myocardial infarction. • AHRR hypomethylation was associated with increased risk of myocardial infarction after adjustment for smoking. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Despite the greater prevalence of familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) in subjects with ischemic heart disease (IHD), premature IHD, and severe hypercholesterolemia (low-density lipoprotein ≥190 mg/dl), overall prevalence estimates are not available.Objectives: The aim of this study was to provide worldwide estimates of FH prevalence in subjects with IHD, premature IHD, and severe hypercholesterolemia compared with those in the general population.Methods: In this systematic review and meta-analyses, Embase, PubMed, and the Web of Science were searched until June 3, 2019, for peer-reviewed papers and conference abstracts reporting heterozygous FH prevalence in nonfounder populations, revealing 104 studies eligible for inclusion.Results: Estimates of FH prevalence were pooled using random-effects meta-analyses and were 0.32% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.26% to 0.39% [corresponding to 1:313]) among 10,921,310 unique subjects in the general population (33,036 patients with FH) on the basis of 44 studies, 3.2% (95% CI: 2.2% to 4.3% [1:31]) among 84,479 unique subjects with IHD (2,103 patients with FH) on the basis of 28 studies, 6.7% (95% CI: 4.9% to 8.7% [1:15]) among 31,316 unique subjects with premature IHD (1,471 patients with FH) on the basis of 32 studies, and 7.2% (95% CI: 4.6% to 10.8% [1:14]) among 17,728 unique subjects with severe hypercholesterolemia (920 patients with FH) on the basis of 7 studies. FH prevalence in the general population was similar using genetic versus clinical diagnoses. Seventeen of 195 countries (9%) in the world have reported FH prevalence for the general population, leaving 178 (91%) countries in the world with unknown prevalence.Conclusions: Compared with 1:313 among subjects in the general population, FH prevalence is 10-fold higher among those with IHD, 20-fold higher among those with premature IHD, and 23-fold higher among those with severe hypercholesterolemia. The prevalence of FH is unknown in 90% of countries in the world. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]