Search

Trans and gender-diverse individuals experience poor mental health, and face significant barriers when trying to access appropriate mental health care. Most seek treatment from mainstream primary care services, who have an ethical duty to provide care to all. Primary care practitioners can ameliorate traumatic harms by identifying helpful strategies and avoiding inappropriate or harmful strategies. However, there is limited robust, culturally sensitive evidence informing clinicians about the appropriateness and efficacy of psychological interventions for trans and gender-diverse clients. This forum article argues that the epistemological and ontological frameworks underlying psychotherapies can impact the therapeutic relationship, and are therefore important factors to consider in primary care practice with trans and gender-diverse clients. Our paper synthesises selected psychotherapies into four clusters. Each cluster is accompanied by discussion of the potential or demonstrated benefits and limitations of the underlying framework, in the context of primary care with trans and gender-diverse clients. We also explore power dynamics in therapeutic relationships with trans and gender-diverse clients, and the challenges these factors pose to developing a shared understanding of the client's needs and preferences. The article concludes with some practical considerations for managing these issues in primary care. Trans and gender-diverse individuals tend to experience poor mental health, often exacerbated by culturally unsafe services in primary care. This paper offers four key frameworks for understanding and anticipating the potential benefits and harms of different psychological therapies when caring for trans and gender-diverse clients. The article concludes with recommendations for implementing the frameworks in practice, and discussion of the scope for involving peer workers in multidisciplinary care teams. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Out-of-pocket healthcare payments are a concern for all, particularly those least able to afford them, a situation only being exacerbated by the current cost-of-living crisis. This article aims to provide an overview of out-of-pocket payments and their impacts on decision-making: whether, or not to delay care or seek care at all. The impact of average out-of-pocket payments on demand for mental healthcare services is provided as a specific example. The available data indicate a positive linear relationship between the average out-of-pocket payments for Medicare services by type of provider, and the proportion of patients who decide not to obtain care from a given type provider. This article also poses that current safety net processes are not consumer centric, the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) Safety Net particularly so, and that change is required. It is recommended that a consumer-centric approach should be adopted with everyone listed on a Medicare card automatically included in the assessment of the Medicare and PBS Safety Nets and for the PBS Safety Net to be automatically assessed through Services Australia. Links to websites are provided to support individual decision-making and registering for available safety nets. Finally, supply side considerations and their implications for market equilibrium and the economy are briefly overviewed. What is known about the topic? Out-of-pocket payments can have significant impacts on healthcare choices; whether or not to delay or seek care. What does this paper add? This article provides an overview of out-of-pocket payments and their impacts on decision-making with a focus on Medicare-subsidised mental health services. Current government measures to contain out-of-pocket payments are overviewed and their limitations highlighted. What are the implications for practitioners? Current Medicare Benefits Schedule and Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) safety nets are not consumer centric, the PBS Safety Net particularly so. Changes should be made to these schemes to further address the burden of out-of-pocket payments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The number of older adults identifying as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and other sexual and gender diverse identities (LGBTQIA+) is growing as populations age and social environments become more accepting. This study uses a global evidence synthesis to understand perceived barriers and facilitators to access to sexual healthcare globally for older LGBTQIA+ adults. We used a scoping review and qualitative evidence synthesis. Embase, PubMed and PsycInfo were searched with terms related to LGBTQIA+ populations, adults aged 45 years, and sexual health care. We used the Cochrane Handbook and the review protocol was registered. Primary and secondary textual data were coded and grouped into themes using PRISMA-SCR and the Minority Stress Model. The certainty of review findings was assessed using the GRADE-CERQual approach. We identified 19 studies and 15 were included in the qualitative evidence synthesis. All studies were from high-income countries. Heterocentricity and male- centricity of sexual healthcare services contributed to feelings of exclusion for older LGBTQIA+ adults. Both anticipated and enacted stigma from healthcare providers resulted in older LGBTQIA+ adults, especially those with chronic conditions, avoiding health services (seven studies each, low certainty). Older LGBTQIA+ adults have unique sexual health needs and may feel their age empowers them to access appropriate care (four studies, low certainty). This review highlights the need for additional research and interventions to improve sexual health services for older LGBTQIA+ adults. Practical strategies to make sexual health less heterocentric (e.g. gender neutral signage) may increase uptake of essential sexual health services. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Transgender individuals who desire medical transition need to access care through their local healthcare system. This is the first study to explore the perceptions of the community and attitudes of healthcare providers towards the delivery of transgender health care in an Australian context. An anonymous survey was conducted of trans and gender-diverse community members; and physicians and trainees in the Hunter New England Local Health District of New South Wales, Australia. Community members were surveyed about their healthcare experiences. Medical students, GPs and hospital physicians were surveyed on their attitudes towards the delivery of transgender health care before and after a 1-h education session that included the lived experience of a community member. Community members expressed a need for increased education for healthcare providers in transgender medicine. Following the intervention, significantly more healthcare providers felt confident to facilitate transgender health care for adults, adolescents and children; and more healthcare providers agreed that medical and surgical treatment should be offered to transgender patients if desired. The positive safety profile of treatment was felt to be the most persuasive factor for the provision of care. Healthcare providers identified a need for health education in transgender medicine; easy access to evidence-based resources; and local referral pathways as key strategies to improving transgender health care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]