The article is a review of the book "Social Change: Theory, History, and Politics" written by Esteban Torres and published by the Latin American Council of Social Sciences (CLACSO). The author analyzes the evolution of theories on social change and highlights the importance of understanding Latin American social thought. The book is divided into different historical periods and highlights the influence of modern philosophy and the figure of Marx in the thinking of social change. The author also mentions the influence of European sociological currents and the autonomous reconstruction of Latin America as a response to a crisis in the classical theoretical and sociological apparatus. The period of weakening of European social thought during World War II and the Cold War is discussed, as well as how the United States became the main pole of intellectual and sociological irradiation. The author emphasizes that the theory that will conquer the world intellectually will come from Latin America. A globalist constellation of Latin American origin is mentioned, which will expand the modern vision of the economy and the State. A higher unity is mentioned that will contain theories without declaring the end of national society. The advent of military dictatorships in Latin America and the maximum penetration of the United States in the continent are mentioned as a break in the history of social sciences in the region. A new post-dictatorial constellation is discussed, which will be permeable to a new intellectual dependence. The author highlights the influence of ideas from France in Latin America and how the post-dictatorial process will impact the vision of social change in the region. Three intellectual currents identified by the author within the postmodern constellation are mentioned: modern politicist, modern culturalist, and antimodern subjectivist. The imitative reception in Latin America of the sociologies of the Self from France is criticized, and the idea of a free individual embodied in the figure of the intellectual is mentioned. There is a discussion of an abandonment of society as a unit of transformation at a time when the different national spheres of the global society became more global and interdependent, and more unequal and unjust. A renewed interest in theories of the world system and the sociologies of globalization in the region is mentioned, but the need to build a theory centered on society that overcomes the limitations detected in the first Latin American globalist constellation is emphasized. [Extracted from the article]