Search

Since the hypervalent twist followed by reductive elimination is a general reaction pattern for hypervalent iodine reagents, mechanistic studies about the hypervalent twist step provide significant guidance for experiments. Our previous work showed there are two types of hypervalent twist models, i.e. apical twist and equatorial twist. We applied both hypervalent twist models to explain the isomerization mechanism of two important electrophilic trifluoromethylating reagents, Togni I and Togni II. To the best of our knowledge, there are less detailed studies about the different twist modes between both reagents, which are important to predict the right reaction mechanism and especially, understand well the differences of reactivity and stability. Here, we successfully identified Togni II's isomerization pathway via equatorial twist, and suggested different hypervalent twist models should be considered to predict the right mechanisms of reactions with hypervalent iodine reagents.

To understand the effect of f-functions in predicting the right reaction mechanism for hypervalent iodine reagents, we adopt the Ahlrichs basis set family def2-SVP and def2-TZVP to revisit the potential energy surfaces of IBX-mediated oxidation and Togni I's isomerisation. Our results further prove that f-functions (in either Pople, Dunning, or Ahlrichs basis set series) are indispensable to predict the correct rate-determining step of hypervalent iodine reagents. The f-functions have a significant impact on the predicted reaction barriers for processes involving the I-X (X = O, OH, CF$_3$, etc.) bond cleavage and formation, e.g. in the reductive elimination step or the hypervalent twist step. We furthermore explore two hypervalent twist modes that account for the different influences of f-functions for IBX and Togni I. Our findings may be helpful for theoretical chemists to appropriately study the reaction mechanism of hypervalent iodine reagents., Comment: 12 pages, 5 figures