Search

In an era of increased climatic disasters, there is an urgent need to develop reliable frameworks and tools for evaluating and improving community resilience to climatic hazards at multiple geographical and temporal scales. Defining and quantifying resilience in the social domain is relatively subjective due to the intricate interplay of socioeconomic factors with disaster resilience. Meanwhile, there is a lack of computationally rigorous, user-friendly tools that can support customized resilience assessment considering local conditions. This study aims to address these gaps through the power of CyberGIS with three objectives: 1) To develop an empirically validated disaster resilience model - Customized Resilience Inference Measurement designed for multi-scale community resilience assessment and influential socioeconomic factors identification, 2) To implement a Platform for Resilience Inference Measurement and Enhancement module in the CyberGISX platform backed by high-performance computing, 3) To demonstrate the utility of PRIME through a representative study. CRIM generates vulnerability, adaptability, and overall resilience scores derived from empirical hazard parameters. Computationally intensive Machine Learning methods are employed to explain the intricate relationships between these scores and socioeconomic driving factors. PRIME provides a web-based notebook interface guiding users to select study areas, configure parameters, calculate and geo-visualize resilience scores, and interpret socioeconomic factors shaping resilience capacities. A representative study showcases the efficiency of the platform while explaining how the visual results obtained may be interpreted. The essence of this work lies in its comprehensive architecture that encapsulates the requisite data, analytical and geo-visualization functions, and ML models for resilience assessment., Comment: 28 pages, 6 figures

The COVID-19 pandemic has changed human life. To mitigate the pandemic's impacts, different regions implemented various policies to contain COVID-19 and residents showed diverse responses. These human responses in turn shaped the uneven spatial-temporal spread of COVID-19. Consequently, the human-pandemic interaction is complex, dynamic, and interconnected. Delineating the reciprocal effects between human society and the pandemic is imperative for mitigating risks from future epidemics. Geospatial big data acquired through mobile applications and sensor networks have facilitated near-real-time tracking and assessment of human responses to the pandemic, enabling a surge in researching human-pandemic interactions. However, these investigations involve inconsistent data sources, human activity indicators, relationship detection models, and analysis methods, leading to a fragmented understanding of human-pandemic dynamics. To assess the current state of human-pandemic interactions research, we conducted a synthesis study based on 67 selected publications between March 2020 and January 2023. We extracted key information from each article across six categories, e.g., research area and time, data, methodological framework, and results and conclusions. Results reveal that regression models were predominant in relationship detection, featured in 67.16% of papers. Only two papers employed spatial-temporal models, notably underrepresented in the existing literature. Studies examining the effects of policies and human mobility on the pandemic's health impacts were the most prevalent, each comprising 12 articles (17.91%). Only 3 papers (4.48%) delved into bidirectional interactions between human responses and the COVID-19 spread. These findings shed light on the need for future research to spatially and temporally model the long-term, bidirectional causal relationships within human-pandemic systems.

The Covid-19 has presented an unprecedented challenge to public health worldwide. However, residents in different countries showed diverse levels of Covid-19 awareness during the outbreak and suffered from uneven health impacts. This study analyzed the global Twitter data from January 1st to June 30th, 2020, seeking to answer two research questions. What are the linguistic and geographical disparities of public awareness in the Covid-19 outbreak period reflected on social media? Can the changing pandemic awareness predict the Covid-19 outbreak? We established a Twitter data mining framework calculating the Ratio index to quantify and track the awareness. The lag correlations between awareness and health impacts were examined at global and country levels. Results show that users presenting the highest Covid-19 awareness were mainly those tweeting in the official languages of India and Bangladesh. Asian countries showed more significant disparities in awareness than European countries, and awareness in the eastern part of Europe was higher than in central Europe. Finally, the Ratio index could accurately predict global mortality rate, global case fatality ratio, and country-level mortality rate, with 21-30, 35-42, and 17 leading days, respectively. This study yields timely insights into social media use in understanding human behaviors for public health research.