Search

Autonomous driving decision-making is one of the critical modules towards intelligent transportation systems, and how to evaluate the driving performance comprehensively and precisely is a crucial challenge. A biased evaluation misleads and hinders decision-making modification and development. Current planning evaluation metrics include deviation from the real driver trajectory and objective driving experience indicators. The former category does not necessarily indicate good driving performance since human drivers also make errors and has been proven to be ineffective in interactive close-loop systems. On the other hand, existing objective driving experience models only consider limited factors, lacking comprehensiveness. And the integration mechanism of various factors relies on intuitive experience, lacking precision. In this research, we propose S2O, a novel integrated decision-making evaluation method bridging subjective human feeling to objective evaluation. First, modified fundamental models of four kinds of driving factors which are safety, time efficiency, comfort, and energy efficiency are established to cover common driving factors. Then based on the analysis of human rating distribution regularity, a segmental linear fitting model in conjunction with a complementary SVM segment classifier is designed to express human's subjective rating by objective driving factor terms. Experiments are conducted on the D2E dataset, which includes approximately 1,000 driving cases and 40,000 human rating scores. Results show that S2O achieves a mean absolute error of 4.58 to ground truth under a percentage scale. Compared with baselines, the evaluation error is reduced by 32.55%. Implementation on the SUMO platform proves the real-time efficiency of online evaluation, and validation on performance evaluation of three autonomous driving planning algorithms proves the feasibility., Comment: 20 pages

With the advancement of deep learning technology, data-driven methods are increasingly used in the decision-making of autonomous driving, and the quality of datasets greatly influenced the model performance. Although current datasets have made significant progress in the collection of vehicle and environment data, emphasis on human-end data including the driver states and human evaluation is not sufficient. In addition, existing datasets consist mostly of simple scenarios such as car following, resulting in low interaction levels. In this paper, we introduce the Driver to Evaluation dataset (D2E), an autonomous decision-making dataset that contains data on driver states, vehicle states, environmental situations, and evaluation scores from human reviewers, covering a comprehensive process of vehicle decision-making. Apart from regular agents and surrounding environment information, we not only collect driver factor data including first-person view videos, physiological signals, and eye attention data, but also provide subjective rating scores from 40 human volunteers. The dataset is mixed of driving simulator scenes and real-road ones. High-interaction situations are designed and filtered to ensure behavior diversity. Through data organization, analysis, and preprocessing, D2E contains over 1100 segments of interactive driving case data covering from human driver factor to evaluation results, supporting the development of data-driven decision-making related algorithms., Comment: Submit for ITSC 2024

The Automated Model Evaluation (AutoEval) framework entertains the possibility of evaluating a trained machine learning model without resorting to a labeled testing set. Despite the promise and some decent results, the existing AutoEval methods heavily rely on computing distribution shifts between the unlabelled testing set and the training set. We believe this reliance on the training set becomes another obstacle in shipping this technology to real-world ML development. In this work, we propose Contrastive Automatic Model Evaluation (CAME), a novel AutoEval framework that is rid of involving training set in the loop. The core idea of CAME bases on a theoretical analysis which bonds the model performance with a contrastive loss. Further, with extensive empirical validation, we manage to set up a predictable relationship between the two, simply by deducing on the unlabeled/unseen testing set. The resulting framework CAME establishes a new SOTA results for AutoEval by surpassing prior work significantly., Comment: ICCV2023 main conference