Search

The article focuses on the grand strategy in Great Britain policy, which is needed to stabilise its states. It says that the Labour Party has re-started the codification of development policy by issuing White Paper in 1997 and National Security Strategy (NSS) in 2007 and Public Service Agreements (PSAs). Meanwhile, it offers suggestions for the country's cross-country strategies, such as the adoption of Stabilisation Unit's facilitation capability by the National Security Council Secretariat.

The article focuses on the strategic issues related to military strategy of Great Britain in Afghanistan. It also reflects on critical inadequacies in the way the politicomilitary system operated in Afghanistan. It reports that Great Britain took the lead in the alliance operation, and commanded the North Atlantic Treaty Organization's Allied Rapid Reaction Corps (ARRC) while following the strategy.

The article focuses on the initiatives made by Great Britain to improve international relations with other countries. It says that the country has developed advances in terms of its security, humanitarian, and military intervention to fragile states. It adds that actions and decision-making were formulated to lessen the challenges face by the government such as stability and structural innovations against terrorism. It mentions the political reforms and strategies which resolve conflict issues.

The article discusses the challenges faced by governmental departments and political aspects in Great Britain during the post-Cold War period. It says that in the middle of 1990s, the British governmental departments have made efforts on establishing international developmental and political advances and cross-departmental co-operation. It adds that the Ministry of Defence (MoD) and the Department for International Development have effectively implemented governmental interventions.

The article reflects on the implications of the government-defence industry relationship in three countries including the U.S., Germany and Great Britain. It informs that the Defence and Security Organisation (DSO) promotes the export of British goods and services. It mentions that the defense industry should be responsive towards national-security threats and there is a need of integration between civil and military technologies.

The article focuses on the control and regulation of defence industries in three countries including Germany, the U.S. and Great Britain. It informs that the british government controls the exports of military products by the Import, Export and Customs Powers (Defence) Act 1939 and the German government uses the War Weapons Control Act for exports of military equipment. It also mentions that the Arms Export Control Act (1976) controls the export of military equipment in the U.S.

The article focuses on the government-defence industrial relationship in three countries including Great Britain, the U.S. and Germany. It informs that the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) contracts for 50-billion U.S. dollars of services each year to the industry. It also mentions the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) in Sweden, the Customer Product Management (CPM) process and Federal Acquisition Regulations (FARs).

The article reflects on the important dimensions of government's role as the customer of the defence industry in three countries including the U.S., Germany and Great Britain. It informs that the British military operations in the Balkans, Iraq and Afghanistan stimulated the readiness of the British Ministry of Defence to be a customer and the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) meet operational demand of armed forces. It mentions the Customer Product Management System in Germany.

The article focuses on a study which concludes that nuclear disarmament exist but is far behind from practice. It mentions that if the U.S. and Russia reduce their deployed strategic arsenals by 50 per cent by 2020, they would still have nuclear arsenals for their security. It mentions that the Great Britain and France have no plans to increase their nuclear weapons in future. It informs that most states gave up nuclear-weapons programmes due to the international non-proliferation norms.