Search

The article analyzes the situation of Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) and discusses the implications of the implementation of the defence reform in BiH. It states that BiH required for establishing effective armed forces which was accomplished by defence reform and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization's (NATO) Partnership for Peace programme. It mentions about the lessons from defence reform in BiH which include direction, concentration and allocation of resources and determination.

The article discusses on the sinews of Indan power protection that projects specifically with land and air capabilities along with the exclusion of foreign basing, which is very important to the military power of India. The article also mentions about the special forces, intelligence, jointness, communications, defence-industrial receptivity which will help India to meet its military challenges.

The article discusses on topics including what is land-power projection, the types of land-power projection, and its amphibious and sealift operations. The article also mentions about India's capabilities of land-power projection along with the country's struggle against an equal rival who would not find it hard to gather a bigger defensive numbers than the size of India's amphibious force.

The article discusses on India's Defence Posture. It explores topics including the basic shape and size of India; its inclination towards defence spending, economic growth, planning of spending and equipment investment. It also highlights the challenges Indian defence has to face along with India's involvement with Power Projection and its role in the country's defence posture.

The article focuses on the Defence Reform Commission (DRC) that develops legislation for establishment of state-level command over armed forces in Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH). It mentions that the Dayton Agreement created a constitutional order in BiH which was accepted by the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). It states that the NATO accepted a separate entity armed forces on certain conditions including security policy, transparency in defence plans and common training standards.

The article presents author's views on Afghan deployment decisions of Great Britain in 2005 and 2006. As stated, during that time Great Britain lacked a credible longterm strategy for the region, and the Foreign Office was never able to answer the question regarding its long-term interests and relative priorities for Pakistan and Afghanistan. The author mentions that the national operational plan that was produced lacked credibility among the military.

The article discusses how deterioration of security conditions on the ground in Helmand, Afghanistan forced the British military to extend the scale of its kinetic operations in 2006. It states that this operational decision affected the efforts of Great Britain in Helmand Province. It also mentions the Joint Plan for Helmand, which was introduced in 2005 and was perceived as a real opportunity to contribute to effective Great Britain strategy for nation-building.