Search

The article discusses the author's critique of a research paper published in Nature that claims there is an optimal average temperature for economic growth. The author argues that the results of the paper do not hold up under scrutiny and are driven by a few countries. The author also questions why such papers are published and suggests that climate alarmists may have an agenda to show that warming will reduce economic growth in order to push for government subsidies and controls. The article concludes by highlighting the importance of platforms like Econ Journal Watch in challenging biased research. [Extracted from the article]