Search

When exporting rolled steel coils in shipping containers, it is required to fasten the cargo safely in a freight container using a special pallet for lashing and shoring such as wood dunnage or a coil cradle. This study aims to evaluate the environmental impact of coil cradles as a function of number of reuses, compared to disposable wood dunnage, through a case study based on container shipping of rolled steel coils in South Korea. The life cycle assessment method was applied for the comparison of the products. Under this analysis conditions, reusable coil cradle had lower environmental impact after 20 uses compared with disposable wood dunnage. Furthermore, the reusable coil cradle should be designed for at least 25 uses for lower impact in every environmental impact category compared with traditional wood dunnage. This study concludes that the environmental impact comparison between disposable wood dunnage and reusable coil cradles could provide useful information to policy makers and producers who determine the frequency of coil cradle reuse in rolled steel coil container shipping., https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15568318.2018.1558468

When exporting rolled steel coils in shipping containers, it is required to fasten the cargo safely in a freight container using a special pallet for lashing and shoring such as wood dunnage or a coil cradle. This study aims to evaluate the environmental impact of coil cradles as a function of number of reuses, compared to disposable wood dunnage, through a case study based on container shipping of rolled steel coils in South Korea. The life cycle assessment method was applied for the comparison of the products. Under this analysis conditions, reusable coil cradle had lower environmental impact after 20 uses compared with disposable wood dunnage. Furthermore, the reusable coil cradle should be designed for at least 25 uses for lower impact in every environmental impact category compared with traditional wood dunnage. This study concludes that the environmental impact comparison between disposable wood dunnage and reusable coil cradles could provide useful information to policy makers and producers who determine the frequency of coil cradle reuse in rolled steel coil container shipping., https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15568318.2018.1558468

When exporting rolled steel coils in shipping containers, it is required to fasten the cargo safely in a freight container using a special pallet for lashing and shoring such as wood dunnage or a coil cradle. This study aims to evaluate the environmental impact of coil cradles as a function of number of reuses, compared to disposable wood dunnage, through a case study based on container shipping of rolled steel coils in South Korea. The life cycle assessment method was applied for the comparison of the products. Under this analysis conditions, reusable coil cradle had lower environmental impact after 20 uses compared with disposable wood dunnage. Furthermore, the reusable coil cradle should be designed for at least 25 uses for lower impact in every environmental impact category compared with traditional wood dunnage. This study concludes that the environmental impact comparison between disposable wood dunnage and reusable coil cradles could provide useful information to policy makers and producers who determine the frequency of coil cradle reuse in rolled steel coil container shipping., https://www.tandfonline.eom/doi/abs/10.1080/15568318.2018.1558468

When exporting rolled steel coils in shipping containers, it is required to fasten the cargo safely in a freight container using a special pallet for lashing and shoring such as wood dunnage or a coil cradle. This study aims to evaluate the environmental impact of coil cradles as a function of number of reuses, compared to disposable wood dunnage, through a case study based on container shipping of rolled steel coils in South Korea. The life cycle assessment method was applied for the comparison of the products. Under this analysis conditions, reusable coil cradle had lower environmental impact after 20 uses compared with disposable wood dunnage. Furthermore, the reusable coil cradle should be designed for at least 25 uses for lower impact in every environmental impact category compared with traditional wood dunnage. This study concludes that the environmental impact comparison between disposable wood dunnage and reusable coil cradles could provide useful information to policy makers and producers who determine the frequency of coil cradle reuse in rolled steel coil container shipping., https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15568318.2018.1558468

When exporting rolled steel coils in shipping containers, it is required to fasten the cargo safely in a freight container using a special pallet for lashing and shoring such as wood dunnage or a coil cradle. This study aims to evaluate the environmental impact of coil cradles as a function of number of reuses, compared to disposable wood dunnage, through a case study based on container shipping of rolled steel coils in South Korea. The life cycle assessment method was applied for the comparison of the products. Under this analysis conditions, reusable coil cradle had lower environmental impact after 20 uses compared with disposable wood dunnage. Furthermore, the reusable coil cradle should be designed for at least 25 uses for lower impact in every environmental impact category compared with traditional wood dunnage. This study concludes that the environmental impact comparison between disposable wood dunnage and reusable coil cradles could provide useful information to policy makers and producers who determine the frequency of coil cradle reuse in rolled steel coil container shipping., https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15568318.2018.1558468

When exporting rolled steel coils in shipping containers, it is required to fasten the cargo safely in a freight container using a special pallet for lashing and shoring such as wood dunnage or a coil cradle. This study aims to evaluate the environmental impact of coil cradles as a function of number of reuses, compared to disposable wood dunnage, through a case study based on container shipping of rolled steel coils in South Korea. The life cycle assessment method was applied for the comparison of the products. Under this analysis conditions, reusable coil cradle had lower environmental impact after 20 uses compared with disposable wood dunnage. Furthermore, the reusable coil cradle should be designed for at least 25 uses for lower impact in every environmental impact category compared with traditional wood dunnage. This study concludes that the environmental impact comparison between disposable wood dunnage and reusable coil cradles could provide useful information to policy makers and producers who determine the frequency of coil cradle reuse in rolled steel coil container shipping., https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15568318.2018.1558468

When exporting rolled steel coils in shipping containers, it is required to fasten the cargo safely in a freight container using a special pallet for lashing and shoring such as wood dunnage or a coil cradle. This study aims to evaluate the environmental impact of coil cradles as a function of number of reuses, compared to disposable wood dunnage, through a case study based on container shipping of rolled steel coils in South Korea. The life cycle assessment method was applied for the comparison of the products. Under this analysis conditions, reusable coil cradle had lower environmental impact after 20 uses compared with disposable wood dunnage. Furthermore, the reusable coil cradle should be designed for at least 25 uses for lower impact in every environmental impact category compared with traditional wood dunnage. This study concludes that the environmental impact comparison between disposable wood dunnage and reusable coil cradles could provide useful information to policy makers and producers who determine the frequency of coil cradle reuse in rolled steel coil container shipping., https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15568318.2018.1558468

When exporting rolled steel coils in shipping containers, it is required to fasten the cargo safely in a freight container using a special pallet for lashing and shoring such as wood dunnage or a coil cradle. This study aims to evaluate the environmental impact of coil cradles as a function of number of reuses, compared to disposable wood dunnage, through a case study based on container shipping of rolled steel coils in South Korea. The life cycle assessment method was applied for the comparison of the products. Under this analysis conditions, reusable coil cradle had lower environmental impact after 20 uses compared with disposable wood dunnage. Furthermore, the reusable coil cradle should be designed for at least 25 uses for lower impact in every environmental impact category compared with traditional wood dunnage. This study concludes that the environmental impact comparison between disposable wood dunnage and reusable coil cradles could provide useful information to policy makers and producers who determine the frequency of coil cradle reuse in rolled steel coil container shipping., https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15568318.2018.1558468

When exporting rolled steel coils in shipping containers, it is required to fasten the cargo safely in a freight container using a special pallet for lashing and shoring such as wood dunnage or a coil cradle. This study aims to evaluate the environmental impact of coil cradles as a function of number of reuses, compared to disposable wood dunnage, through a case study based on container shipping of rolled steel coils in South Korea. The life cycle assessment method was applied for the comparison of the products. Under this analysis conditions, reusable coil cradle had lower environmental impact after 20 uses compared with disposable wood dunnage. Furthermore, the reusable coil cradle should be designed for at least 25 uses for lower impact in every environmental impact category compared with traditional wood dunnage. This study concludes that the environmental impact comparison between disposable wood dunnage and reusable coil cradles could provide useful information to policy makers and producers who determine the frequency of coil cradle reuse in rolled steel coil container shipping., https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15568318.2018.1558468

When exporting rolled steel coils in shipping containers, it is required to fasten the cargo safely in a freight container using a special pallet for lashing and shoring such as wood dunnage or a coil cradle. This study aims to evaluate the environmental impact of coil cradles as a function of number of reuses, compared to disposable wood dunnage, through a case study based on container shipping of rolled steel coils in South Korea. The life cycle assessment method was applied for the comparison of the products. Under this analysis conditions, reusable coil cradle had lower environmental impact after 20 uses compared with disposable wood dunnage. Furthermore, the reusable coil cradle should be designed for at least 25 uses for lower impact in every environmental impact category compared with traditional wood dunnage. This study concludes that the environmental impact comparison between disposable wood dunnage and reusable coil cradles could provide useful information to policy makers and producers who determine the frequency of coil cradle reuse in rolled steel coil container shipping., https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15568318.2018.1558468

When exporting rolled steel coils in shipping containers, it is required to fasten the cargo safely in a freight container using a special pallet for lashing and shoring such as wood dunnage or a coil cradle. This study aims to evaluate the environmental impact of coil cradles as a function of number of reuses, compared to disposable wood dunnage, through a case study based on container shipping of rolled steel coils in South Korea. The life cycle assessment method was applied for the comparison of the products. Under this analysis conditions, reusable coil cradle had lower environmental impact after 20 uses compared with disposable wood dunnage. Furthermore, the reusable coil cradle should be designed for at least 25 uses for lower impact in every environmental impact category compared with traditional wood dunnage. This study concludes that the environmental impact comparison between disposable wood dunnage and reusable coil cradles could provide useful information to policy makers and producers who determine the frequency of coil cradle reuse in rolled steel coil container shipping., https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15568318.2018.1558468

When exporting rolled steel coils in shipping containers, it is required to fasten the cargo safely in a freight container using a special pallet for lashing and shoring such as wood dunnage or a coil cradle. This study aims to evaluate the environmental impact of coil cradles as a function of number of reuses, compared to disposable wood dunnage, through a case study based on container shipping of rolled steel coils in South Korea. The life cycle assessment method was applied for the comparison of the products. Under this analysis conditions, reusable coil cradle had lower environmental impact after 20 uses compared with disposable wood dunnage. Furthermore, the reusable coil cradle should be designed for at least 25 uses for lower impact in every environmental impact category compared with traditional wood dunnage. This study concludes that the environmental impact comparison between disposable wood dunnage and reusable coil cradles could provide useful information to policy makers and producers who determine the frequency of coil cradle reuse in rolled steel coil container shipping., https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15568318.2018.1558468

When exporting rolled steel coils in shipping containers, it is required to fasten the cargo safely in a freight container using a special pallet for lashing and shoring such as wood dunnage or a coil cradle. This study aims to evaluate the environmental impact of coil cradles as a function of number of reuses, compared to disposable wood dunnage, through a case study based on container shipping of rolled steel coils in South Korea. The life cycle assessment method was applied for the comparison of the products. Under this analysis conditions, reusable coil cradle had lower environmental impact after 20 uses compared with disposable wood dunnage. Furthermore, the reusable coil cradle should be designed for at least 25 uses for lower impact in every environmental impact category compared with traditional wood dunnage. This study concludes that the environmental impact comparison between disposable wood dunnage and reusable coil cradles could provide useful information to policy makers and producers who determine the frequency of coil cradle reuse in rolled steel coil container shipping., https://www.tandfonline.eom/doi/abs/10.1080/15568318.2018.1558468

When exporting rolled steel coils in shipping containers, it is required to fasten the cargo safely in a freight container using a special pallet for lashing and shoring such as wood dunnage or a coil cradle. This study aims to evaluate the environmental impact of coil cradles as a function of number of reuses, compared to disposable wood dunnage, through a case study based on container shipping of rolled steel coils in South Korea. The life cycle assessment method was applied for the comparison of the products. Under this analysis conditions, reusable coil cradle had lower environmental impact after 20 uses compared with disposable wood dunnage. Furthermore, the reusable coil cradle should be designed for at least 25 uses for lower impact in every environmental impact category compared with traditional wood dunnage. This study concludes that the environmental impact comparison between disposable wood dunnage and reusable coil cradles could provide useful information to policy makers and producers who determine the frequency of coil cradle reuse in rolled steel coil container shipping., https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15568318.2018.1558468

When exporting rolled steel coils in shipping containers, it is required to fasten the cargo safely in a freight container using a special pallet for lashing and shoring such as wood dunnage or a coil cradle. This study aims to evaluate the environmental impact of coil cradles as a function of number of reuses, compared to disposable wood dunnage, through a case study based on container shipping of rolled steel coils in South Korea. The life cycle assessment method was applied for the comparison of the products. Under this analysis conditions, reusable coil cradle had lower environmental impact after 20 uses compared with disposable wood dunnage. Furthermore, the reusable coil cradle should be designed for at least 25 uses for lower impact in every environmental impact category compared with traditional wood dunnage. This study concludes that the environmental impact comparison between disposable wood dunnage and reusable coil cradles could provide useful information to policy makers and producers who determine the frequency of coil cradle reuse in rolled steel coil container shipping., https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15568318.2018.1558468

When exporting rolled steel coils in shipping containers, it is required to fasten the cargo safely in a freight container using a special pallet for lashing and shoring such as wood dunnage or a coil cradle. This study aims to evaluate the environmental impact of coil cradles as a function of number of reuses, compared to disposable wood dunnage, through a case study based on container shipping of rolled steel coils in South Korea. The life cycle assessment method was applied for the comparison of the products. Under this analysis conditions, reusable coil cradle had lower environmental impact after 20 uses compared with disposable wood dunnage. Furthermore, the reusable coil cradle should be designed for at least 25 uses for lower impact in every environmental impact category compared with traditional wood dunnage. This study concludes that the environmental impact comparison between disposable wood dunnage and reusable coil cradles could provide useful information to policy makers and producers who determine the frequency of coil cradle reuse in rolled steel coil container shipping., https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15568318.2018.1558468

When exporting rolled steel coils in shipping containers, it is required to fasten the cargo safely in a freight container using a special pallet for lashing and shoring such as wood dunnage or a coil cradle. This study aims to evaluate the environmental impact of coil cradles as a function of number of reuses, compared to disposable wood dunnage, through a case study based on container shipping of rolled steel coils in South Korea. The life cycle assessment method was applied for the comparison of the products. Under this analysis conditions, reusable coil cradle had lower environmental impact after 20 uses compared with disposable wood dunnage. Furthermore, the reusable coil cradle should be designed for at least 25 uses for lower impact in every environmental impact category compared with traditional wood dunnage. This study concludes that the environmental impact comparison between disposable wood dunnage and reusable coil cradles could provide useful information to policy makers and producers who determine the frequency of coil cradle reuse in rolled steel coil container shipping., https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15568318.2018.1558468

When exporting rolled steel coils in shipping containers, it is required to fasten the cargo safely in a freight container using a special pallet for lashing and shoring such as wood dunnage or a coil cradle. This study aims to evaluate the environmental impact of coil cradles as a function of number of reuses, compared to disposable wood dunnage, through a case study based on container shipping of rolled steel coils in South Korea. The life cycle assessment method was applied for the comparison of the products. Under this analysis conditions, reusable coil cradle had lower environmental impact after 20 uses compared with disposable wood dunnage. Furthermore, the reusable coil cradle should be designed for at least 25 uses for lower impact in every environmental impact category compared with traditional wood dunnage. This study concludes that the environmental impact comparison between disposable wood dunnage and reusable coil cradles could provide useful information to policy makers and producers who determine the frequency of coil cradle reuse in rolled steel coil container shipping., https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15568318.2018.1558468

Bacillus cereus is a Gram-positive endospore-forming ubiquitous bacterium that is responsible for causing emetic and diarrheal types of food poisoning. Bacillus illnesses are caused by bacterial endospores that survive when [...]

MIRACLE OR DISASTER? Over the last two years, South Korea's economy has recovered from the 1997 East Asian economic crisis faster than anyone expected. Indeed, Korea has become the new [...]