Search

The novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) affects primarily the respiratory tract, and if left unchecked can cause a spectrum of pathological manifestations such as pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome, myocardial injury, thromboembolism, and acute kidney injury. Medication strategies have involved minimizing the spread of the virus through antiviral medications (monoclonal antibodies or nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors). Here, we develop a mathematical model that simulates viral dynamics in an untreated individual, and the evaluate the impact that a monoclonal antibody can have on slowing viral replication. Drug pharmacokinetics (PK) was informed by a typical two-compartment PK model with parameters typical of a monoclonal antibody, with a third compartment for the lung included as the drug site of action. The viral dynamics were captured using a simplified model describing uninfected target cells, infected target cells, and viral load in the body. The mechanism of action of the simulated antiviral is based on binding to the virus, thereby preventing it from infecting healthy cells. The model is used to project dosages needed to prevent severe disease under a variety of simulated conditions and subject to realistic constraints. The proposed model can capture a variety of scenarios of longitudinal viral dynamics and assess the impact of antiviral therapy on disease severity and duration. The described approach can be easily adapted to rapidly assess the dosages needed to affect duration and outcome of other viral infections and can serve as part of a fast and efficient scientific and modeling response strategy in the future as needed

Immunosuppressive drugs can alleviate debilitating symptoms of autoimmune diseases, but, by the same token, excessive immune suppression can result in an increased risk of infection. Despite the dangers of a compromised immune system, clear definitions of what constitutes excessive suppression remain elusive. Here we review the most common infections associated with primary antibody deficiencies (PADs), such as agammaglobulinemia, common variable immunodeficiency (CVID), and IgA deficiency, as well as infections that are associated with drug-induced or secondary antibody immunodeficiencies (SADs). We identify a number of bacterial, viral, and fungal infections (e.g., Listeria monocytogenes, Staphylococcussp., Salmonellaspp., Escherichia coli, influenza, varicella zoster virus, and herpes simplex virus) associated with both PADs and SADs, and suggest that diagnostic criteria for PADs could be used as a first-line measure to identify potentially unsafe levels of immune suppression in SADs. Specifically, we suggest that, based on PAD diagnostic criteria, IgG levels should remain above 2–3 g/L, IgA levels should not fall below 0.07 g/L, and IgM levels should remain above 0.4 g/L to prevent immunosuppressive drugs from inducing mimicking PAD-like effects. We suggest that these criteria could be used in the early stages of drug development, and that pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modeling could help guide patient selection to potentially improve drug safety. We illustrate the proposed approach using atacicept as an example and conclude with a discussion of the applicability of this approach for other drugs that may induce excessive immune suppression.