1. Effective Pressure Law for the Intrinsic Formation Factor in Low Permeability Sandstones
- Author
-
Chen, M., Li, M., Bernabé, Y., Zhao, J. Z., Zhang, L. H., Zhang, Z. Y., Tang, Y. B., and Xiao, W. L.
- Abstract
The effective pressure law for the intrinsic formation factor of low permeability sandstones from the Ordos Basin (northwest of China) was studied experimentally by measuring the electrical resistivity of brine saturated rock samples while cycling the pore and confining pressures, ppand pc. We used a 100,000 ppm NaCl solution so that the results could be directly interpreted in terms of the intrinsic formation factor F. The Response Surface method was used to construct a quadratic function of ppand pcfitting the experimental data, from which the coefficient αof the effective pressure law, peff= pc– αpp, was determined. We found that the coefficient αgenerally had low values, mainly from 0.2 to 0.4, thus contradicting the theoretical prediction that α should be equal to 1 for scale‐invariant properties, such as F, in linear elastic materials having a homogeneous solid matrix. Since the two underlying assumptions, linear elasticity and homogeneity of the solid matrix, are likely violated in reservoir rocks, we tried to assess their effects on α using simple analytical models, based on idealized geometries of the pore and solid phases. Analysis of these models suggests that non‐linear elasticity associated with the formation of solid–solid contacts in the compressed rocks (e.g., during closure of rough cracks or crack‐like pores along the grain boundaries), may be more effective in producing the low α values observed than inhomogeneity of the solid matrix. The intrinsic formation factor F of brine‐saturated low permeability sandstones were measured by cycling pore and confining pressuresEPL coefficient α mainly varies from 0.2 to 0.4 and contradicting the theoretical prediction of α = 1 for scale‐invariant propertiesNon‐linear elasticity associated with the formation of solid–solid contacts was considered the main reason for low α values
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF