Search

Antipsychotics are effective in preventing relapses of schizophrenia, but it is generally believed that their long‐term use is harmful for patients’ physical well‐being. However, there are no long‐term studies which have verified this view. This nationwide, register‐based cohort study aimed to assess the risk of hospitalization due to physical health problems, as a marker for severe physical morbidity, and the risk of all‐cause mortality, as well as of cardiovascular and suicidal death, associated with antipsychotic use in all patients treated for schizophrenia in inpatient care between 1972 and 2014 in Finland (N=62,250), with up to 20 years of follow‐up (median: 14.1 years). The use of antipsychotic drugs (i.e., use of any antipsychotic compared with non‐use) and the use of specific antipsychotics were investigated, and outcomes were somatic and cardiovascular hospitalization, and all‐cause, cardiovascular and suicide death. Hospitalization‐based outcomes were analyzed by a within‐individual design to eliminate selection bias, comparing use and non‐use periods in the same individual by stratified Cox model. Mortality outcomes were assessed by traditional between‐individual Cox multivariate models. The adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) for any somatic hospitalization and cardiovascular hospitalization were 1.00 (95% CI: 0.98‐1.03) and 1.00 (95% CI: 0.92‐1.07) during use of any antipsychotic compared to non‐exposure periods within the same individual. The aHRs were 0.48 (95% CI: 0.46‐0.51) for all‐cause mortality, 0.62 (95% CI: 0.57‐0.67) for cardiovascular mortality, and 0.52 (95% CI: 0.43‐0.62) for suicide mortality during use vs. non‐use of any antipsychotic. The most beneficial mortality outcome was associated with use of clozapine in terms of all‐cause (aHR=0.39, 95% CI: 0.36‐0.43), cardiovascular (aHR=0.55, 95% CI: 0.47‐0.64) and suicide mortality (aHR=0.21, 95% CI: 0.15‐0.29). The cumulative mortality rates during maximum follow‐up of 20 years were 46.2% for no antipsychotic use, 25.7% for any antipsychotic use, and 15.6% for clozapine use. These data suggest that long‐term antipsychotic use does not increase severe physical morbidity leading to hospitalization, and is associated with substantially decreased mortality, especially among patients treated with clozapine.

Little is known about the comparative effectiveness of long-term pharmacological treatments for severe unipolar depression. We aimed to study the effectiveness of pharmacological treatments in relapse prevention in a nationwide cohort of patients who had been admitted to hospital at least once as a result of unipolar depression.

There are conflicting data on postmenopausal hormone therapy (HT) and the risk of vascular dementia (VD) and Alzheimer's disease (AD).

Context:The “window of opportunity hypothesis” refers to data indicating that conjugated equine estrogen alone or in combination with medroxyprogesterone acetate, if initiated before 60 years of age, protects the heart but endangers it if initiated later (Women's Health Initiative study). Less is known about the “window of opportunity hypothesis” with natural estradiol alone (ET) or with various progestins in combination with estradiol (EPT).Objective:We related the death risk from coronary heart disease (CHD) in users of ET or EPT to the age at the initiation of therapy and to the progestin component of EPT.Design, Patients, Interventions, and Main Outcome Measures:Altogether, 498 105 women had used ET or EPT containing medroxyprogesterone acetate, norethisterone acetate, dydrogesterone, other progestins, or tibolone during 3.7 million person-years during 1994–2009. Women were followed from the therapy initiation to death, or to the end of year 2009. The risk of CHD death in hormone users was compared with that in the age-matched background population using standardized mortality ratio with 95% confidence intervals.Results:Age younger than 60 rather than older than 60 years at the initiation of ET (standardized mortality ratio, 0.53; 95% confidence interval, 0.47–0.59 vs 0.76; 0.71–0.82), EPT with norethisterone acetate (0.45; 0.41–0.49 vs 0.74; 0.67–0.81), or tibolone (0.35; 0.26–0.47 vs 1.01; 0.67–1.46) therapy lasting for less than 5 years was associated with significantly greater decreases in the CHD death risk. A similar tendency was also seen for other EPT groups and for longer use. In all hormone users, the CHD death risk was smaller the earlier the use of ET or EPT had started (P< .05); this phenomenon was unrelated to the progestin component of EPT.Conclusions:Estradiol-based hormone therapies are accompanied with larger CHD mortality risk reductions the earlier the therapies are initiated. The progestin component of EPT does not modify this “timing effect.”

Context:Current guidelines recommend annual discontinuation of postmenopausal hormone therapy (HT) to evaluate whether a woman could manage without the treatment. The impact of HT on cardiovascular health has been widely studied, but it is not known how the withdrawal of HT affects cardiovascular risk.Objective:We evaluated the risk of cardiac or stroke death after the discontinuation of HT.Design, Patients, Interventions, and Main Outcome Measures:Altogether 332 202 Finnish women discontinuing HT between 1994 and 2009 (data from National Reimbursement register) were followed up from the discontinuation date to death due to cardiac cause (n = 3177) or stroke (n = 1952), or to the end of 2009. The deaths, retrieved from the national Cause of Death Register, were compared with the expected number of deaths in the age-standardized background population. In a subanalysis we also compared HT stoppers with HT users.Results:Within the first posttreatment year, the risk of cardiac death was significantly elevated (standardized mortality ratio; 95% confidence interval 1.26; 1.16–1.37), whereas follow-up for longer than 1 year was accompanied with a reduction (0.75; 0.72–0.78). The risk of stroke death in the first posttreatment year was increased (1.63; 1.47–1.79), but follow-up for longer than 1 year was accompanied with a reduced risk (0.89; 0.85–0.94). The cardiac (2.30; 2.12–2.50) and stroke (2.52; 2.28–2.77) death risk elevations were even higher when compared with HT users. In women who discontinued HT at age younger than 60 years, but not in women aged 60 years or older, the cardiac mortality risk was elevated (1.94; 1.51–2.48).Conclusions:Increased cardiovascular death risks question the safety of annual HT discontinuation practice to evaluate whether a woman could manage without HT.

ObjectivesTo compare the use of hormone therapy between Finnish postmenopausal women with and without a diagnosis for Alzheimer’s disease.DesignNationwide case-control study.SettingFinnish national population and drug register, between 1999 and 2013.ParticipantsAll postmenopausal women (n=84 739) in Finland who, between 1999 and 2013, received a diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease from a neurologist or geriatrician, and who were identified from a national drug register. Control women without a diagnosis (n=84 739), matched by age and hospital district, were traced from the Finnish national population register.InterventionsData on hormone therapy use were obtained from the Finnish national drug reimbursement register.Main outcome measuresOdds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for Alzheimer’s disease, calculated with conditional logistic regression analysis.ResultsIn 83 688 (98.8%) women, a diagnosis for Alzheimer’s disease was made at the age of 60 years or older, and 47 239 (55.7%) women had been over 80 years of age at diagnosis. Use of systemic hormone therapy was associated with a 9-17% increased risk of Alzheimer’s disease. The risk of the disease did not differ significantly between users of estradiol only (odds ratio 1.09, 95% confidence interval 1.05 to 1.14) and those of oestrogen-progestogen (1.17, 1.13 to 1.21). The risk increases in users of oestrogen-progestogen therapy were not related to different progestogens (norethisterone acetate, medroxyprogesterone acetate, or other progestogens); but in women younger than 60 at hormone therapy initiation, these risk increases were associated with hormone therapy exposure over 10 years. Furthermore, the age at initiation of systemic hormone therapy was not a decisive determinant for the increase in risk of Alzheimer’s disease. The exclusive use of vaginal estradiol did not affect the risk of the disease (0.99, 0.96 to 1.01).ConclusionsLong term use of systemic hormone therapy might be accompanied with an overall increased risk of Alzheimer’s disease, which is not related to the type of progestogen or the age at initiation of systemic hormone therapy. By contrast, use of vaginal estradiol shows no such risk. Even though the absolute risk increase for Alzheimer’s disease is small, our data should be implemented into information for present and future users of hormone therapy.