Search

Study objective: To evaluate excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) at work and effects on reported work performance among men in the general population and male patients suffering from snoring and obstructive [...]

Individuals often resort to YouTube as a means of accessing insights into their medical conditions and potential avenues for treatment. Among prevalent and incapacitating afflictions within the general populace, restless leg syndrome assumes significance. The focal objective of this investigation is to scrutinize the caliber inherent in videos pertaining to restless leg syndrome disseminated via the YouTube platform. The sorting of videos was accomplished by gauging their pertinence subsequent to conducting a search for “restless leg syndrome” on YouTube, specifically on the 20th of August, 2023. The evaluation encompassed videos curated from the selection of the top 50 English language videos deemed most relevant. The review process entailed the comprehensive assessment of relevance and content by 2 distinct medical professionals operating independently. Furthermore, pertinent descriptive attributes of each video, such as upload date, view count, likes, dislikes, and comments, were meticulously documented within the dataset. To ascertain video quality, the DISCERN Score, global quality score, and Journal of the American Medical Association rating scales were employed as evaluative tools. Significant statistical disparities were observed in terms of DISCERN scores between videos uploaded by medical doctors and those uploaded by individuals without medical qualifications (P< .001). Correspondingly, upon comparing the 2 aforementioned groups, videos uploaded by healthcare professionals exhibited statistically superior quality scores in both the Journal of the American Medical Association and global quality score assessments (P< .001 for both comparisons). The informational quality regarding restless leg syndrome on YouTube presents a spectrum of variability. Notably, videos that offer valuable insights, as well as those that could potentially mislead viewers, do not display discernible variations in terms of their viewership and popularity. For patients seeking reliable information, a useful and safe approach involves favoring videos uploaded by medical professionals. It is imperative to prioritize the professional identity of the content uploader rather than being swayed by the video’s popularity or the quantity of comments it has amassed.

Standardized diagnostic criteria determined by the International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group were used to investigate the current prevalence of restless legs syndrome (RLS). Possible associations between RLS and neuropsychiatric and somatic complaints were also investigated. A random sample of 4,000 men living in central Sweden were sent a questionnaire that included questions about sleep habits, symptoms of sleepiness, and somatic and neuropsychiatric complaints. Four symptom questions accepted as minimal diagnostic criteria for RLS were also included. Odds (OR) ratios and 95% confidence interval (CI) for different variables were calculated by means of multivariate logistic regression; 5.8% of the men suffered from RLS. The prevalence of RLS increased with age. Sleep‐related complaints were more frequent among the RLS sufferers. Complaints of headache at awakening and daytime headache were reported three to five times more frequently among RLS sufferers and there was a tendency toward reported social isolation related to RLS. Subjects with RLS more frequently reported depressed mood (OR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.8–3.8), and complained more often of reduced libido (OR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.4–3.3). RLS sufferers more frequently reported hypertension (OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 0.9–2.4) and heart problems (OR, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.4–4.3). Results show that restless legs syndrome is common among men. It is hypothesized that RLS may be associated with several somatic and neuropsychiatric symptoms. © 2001 Movement Disorder Society.

AbstractSnoring is a significant problem both for the patient and for the bed partner. Seventy-two male and female heavy snorers and their bed partners participated in a double-blinded, placebo-controlled study on the effects of a volatile oil administered by gargling. The patients were diagnosed as heavy snorers after they underwent overnight polysomnography showing that their apnea indexes were below 5, thus sleep apnea patients were not included in the study. The participants and their partners filled out evaluations concerning snoring intensity, mouth dryness, nasal stuffiness and the Epworth Sleepiness Scale prior to and after using the volatile oil or placebo for 14 consecutive nights. There were no statistically significant decreases in snoring as graded by the bed partner or in mouth dryness, nasal stuffiness, or the Epworth Sleepiness Scale scores graded by the patients who were randomized to use the volatile oil. The results of this study indicate that this volatile oil is not an effective treatment in patients presenting with symptoms of snoring.Copyright © 2001 S. Karger AG, Basel

Three case reports describe nocturia and enuresis as complications of the obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS). It is important to recognize the causal relationship since these troublesome symptoms are easily treated by treating the sleep apnea.

In the September 1994 issue of the ARCHIVES, Jennum and colleagues1 reported on an association between snoring and headache.We want to add some preliminary data from an on-going case-control study including heavy snorers and patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS), both men and women, aged between 30 and 64 years.The data were collected from consecutive patients (613 men and 129 women) referred to the sleep laboratory at Avesta (Sweden) Hospital because of suspected OSAS. Prior to admission, the patients responded to a questionnaire that included the question: Do you suffer from morning headache frequently or very frequently? The patients underwent sleep apnea screening2 and were classified as suffering from OSAS (282 men and 35 women) or from heavy snoring (331 men and 94 women).Control subjects (298 men and 291 women) were randomly selected from the general population in the same area as the patients.