1. Imperfect forward secrecy.
- Author
-
Adrian, David, Bhargavan, Karthikeyan, Durumeric, Zakir, Gaudry, Pierrick, Green, Matthew, Halderman, J. Alex, Heninger, Nadia, Springall, Drew, Thomé, Emmanuel, Valenta, Luke, VanderSloot, Benjamin, Wustrow, Eric, Zanella-Béguelin, Santiago, and Zimmermann, Paul
- Subjects
COMPUTER network protocols ,PUBLIC key cryptography ,CRYPTOGRAPHY ,CRYPTOSYSTEMS ,DATA encryption ,COMPUTER network security ,VIRTUAL private networks - Abstract
We investigate the security of Diffie-Hellman key exchange as used in popular Internet protocols and find it to be less secure than widely believed. First, we present Logjam, a novel flaw in TLS that lets a man-in-the-middle downgrade connections to "export-grade" Diffie-Hellman. To carry out this attack, we implement the number field sieve discrete logarithm algorithm. After a week-long precomputation for a specified 512-bit group, we can compute arbitrary discrete logarithms in that group in about a minute. We find that 82% of vulnerable servers use a single 512-bit group, and that 8.4% of Alexa Top Million HTTPS sites are vulnerable to the attack. In response, major browsers have changed to reject short groups. We go on to consider Diffie-Hellman with 768- and 1024-bit groups. We estimate that even in the 1024-bit case, the computations are plausible given nation-state resources. A small number of fixed or standardized groups are used by millions of servers; performing precomputation for a single 1024-bit group would allow passive eavesdropping on 18% of popular HTTPS sites, and a second group would allow decryption of traffic to 66% of IPsec VPNs and 26% of SSH servers. A close reading of published NSA leaks shows that the agency's attacks on VPNs are consistent with having achieved such a break. We conclude that moving to stronger key exchange methods should be a priority for the Internet community. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF