Search

Background More sex-specific pain sensitivity normative values from population-based cohorts in pain-free older adults are required. The aims of this study were (1) to provide sex- and age-specific normative values of pressure and cold pain thresholds in older pain-free adults and (2) to examine the association of potential correlates of pain sensitivity with pain threshold values.Methods This study investigated sex-specific pressure (lumbar spine, tibialis anterior, neck and dorsal wrist) and cold (dorsal wrist) pain threshold estimates for older pain-free adults aged 41–70 years. This cross-sectional study used participants (n= 212) from the Raine Study Gen1-26 year follow-up. The association of pain thresholds, with correlates including sex, test site, ethnicity, waist-hip ratio, smoking status, health-related quality of life, depression, anxiety and stress symptoms, sleep quality, socioeconomic status and physical activity levels, was examined.Results Values for pressure and cold pain thresholds for older pain-free adults are provided, grouped by vicennium, sex and test site (pressure). Statistically significant independent correlates of increased pressure pain sensitivity were test site, ethnicity and sex. Only lower waist/hip ratio was a statistically significant, independent correlate of increased cold pain sensitivity.Conclusions This study provides robust sex- and age-specific normative values for pressure pain threshold and cold pain threshold for an older adult pain-free population. Combined with existing values, these data provide an important resource in assisting interpretation of pain sensitivity in clinical pain disorders and provide insights into the complex association of pain sensitivity with correlates that can be used in research.

Many manual handling activities involve combinations of pull, lift, carry, lower and push, yet few studies have investigated how to assess the risk of such combination tasks. Most recommendations assume that a combination task can be split into its components for assessment. The aim of this study was to compare the risks assessed in single manual handling tasks with those in combination tasks. Nine male and nine female students participated in a study to determine Maximum Acceptable Weights (MAWs) in single and combination tasks at different frequencies (1 min-1 and 3 min-1 for combination tasks and 3 min -1 and 6 min -1 for single tasks) and heights (floor, knuckle, shoulder). Combination tasks consisted of one each of die single tasks (pull, lift, carry, lower and push). The MAW of each combination task was compared to rhe MAWs of the single tasks of which it was composed using repeated measures analysis of variance with specified contrasts. In at least one of the 12 comparisons each single task MAW was found to be different from its related combination task MAW. It was concluded that the current use of single task MAWs to estimate the risk in combination tasks was unacceptable. Prediction models for combination task MAWs based on single tasks MAWs were also developed, using step-wise regression. Although coefficients of determination of around 0-8 were achieved it was argued that owing to their situation-specific nature the prediction of combination task risk using single task MAWs was likely to result in unacceptable risk errors.