Search

Trimodality therapy (TMT) is a viable option for muscle-invasive localized bladder cancer, providing an alternative to radical cystectomy in properly selected patients. The approval of novel therapeutics in different stages of bladder cancer treatment has sparked interest in exploring concurrent systemic therapies with radiation in clinical trials to enhance long-term outcomes. Achieving uniformity in trial eligibility criteria and endpoint definitions is imperative in describing clinical significance, comparing trials, and changing standard of care guidelines. To delineate eligibility criteria and appropriate endpoints for TMT clinical trials in an attempt to achieve uniformity in trial eligibility criteria and endpoint definitions which will then help move the field of bladder preservation forward and improve the current standard of care. An expert panel, comprising individuals with extensive experience in bladder cancer clinical trials, clinical practice focused on bladder cancer treatment, and patient advocacy, was assembled. The panel systematically reviewed phase II/III clinical trials previously published and assessing the role of radiation in definitive therapy with the specific goal of preserving native bladder function during bladder cancer treatment. Recommendations were summarized based on review of these trials and past experiences of the investigators. To ensure a holistic perspective, the summary was further subjected to rigorous reevaluation by a patient advocate, who added valuable insights from a patient’s standpoint. The resulting consensus statements were summarized in this publication to contribute to the evolving landscape of bladder cancer research and treatment. The eligibility criteria for TMT should be pragmatic to encompass patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-2, bladder cancer stage T2-T4a N0±N1M0, unilateral tumor-associated hydronephrosis, attempted maximal transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT), both pure urothelial carcinoma and/or mixed histologic subtypes (excluding rare and aggressive small cell variants) and patients who are non- cystectomy candidates. Bladder intact event-free survival (BIEFS) is proposed as a suitable endpoint for registration trials designed to compare two different treatment interventions, defined as the time from randomization to muscle-invasive or locoregional recurrence, systemic recurrence, radical cystectomy from any cause, or death from any cause. Overall survival is deemed an appropriate secondary endpoint or a co-primary end point as recent improvements in systemic therapy can produce significant improvement in long-term outcomes. Primary and secondary endpoints should be supported with patient-reported quality of life assessments, when available. The standardization of clinical trial design, eligibility criteria, and endpoints is essential for expediting progress in the field. Inclusivity, patient-centricity, and clinically meaningful endpoints will facilitate the analysis, comparison, and meta-analysis of different trials, fostering advancements in bladder cancer treatment.

The treatment of urothelial cancer can present challenges given the tendency for patients with early-stage tumors to experience rapid progression to advanced disease following standard management. Additionally, recent data on [...]

•Our findings suggest that the treatment with an immune checkpoint inhibitor-containing monotherapy or platinum-based chemoimmunotherapy combination regimens results in a modest but significant reduction in the risk of death in metastatic urothelial carcinoma patients (overall survival-hazard ratio [OS-HR] = 0.84; 95% CI, 0.78-0.90; P <.05).•No visceral metastatic site (HR 0.67; 95% CI, 0.76-0.90) and high programmed death ligand-1 expression (HR 0.74; 95% CI, 0.64-0.87) were significantly associated with a reduced risk of death.

ABSTRACTIntroductionThe standard treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) is cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by radical cystectomy or upfront radical cystectomy for cisplatin-ineligible patients. In those who are ineligible for or refuse radical cystectomy, trimodal therapy with chemoradiation is offered. However, with the success of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and antibody-drug conjugates such as enfortumab vedotin in the metastatic setting, several trials are implementing these drugs in the neoadjuvant setting for cisplatin ineligible patients. Indeed, nivolumab is approved as adjuvant therapy for high-risk muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma.Areas coveredClinical trials using ICI, ICI/ICI, and ICI/chemotherapy combination therapies in the perioperative setting have been completed. These clinical trials have demonstrated that neoadjuvant ICI are safe and have encouraging pCR, making them promising treatment options. Neoadjuvant enfortumab vedotin alone and in combination with pembrolizumab is also being studied, and preliminarily to have promising activity. ICI is also being combined with radiation therapy (RT) and early data indicate that ICI combined with RT or chemo-RT may be safe with promising activity.Expert opinionBiomarkers are urgently needed to identify appropriate treatment options for individual patients. The use of novel treatment approaches and biomarkers will help shape the future of precision therapy for MIBC and enable bladder preservation.

ABSTRACTIntroductionThe treatment landscape for advanced-stage, unresectable or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) has shifted dramatically over a short period of time, with new therapeutic agents available for clinical use. However, despite these recent advances in the field, mUC continues to be a disease with significant morbidity and mortality and remains generally incurable. While platinum-based therapy remains the backbone of therapy, many patients are ineligible for chemotherapy or have failed initial chemotherapy treatment. In post-platinum treated patients, immunotherapy and antibody drug conjugates have provided incremental advances, but agents with better therapeutic index guided by precision medicine are needed.Areas coveredThis article covers the available monoclonal antibody therapies in mUC excluding immunotherapy and antibody drug conjugates. Included are a review of data utilizing monoclonal antibodies targeting VEG-F, HER-2, FGFR, and KIR-2 in the setting of mUC. A literature search from 6/2022– 9/2022 was performed utilizing PubMed with key terms including urothelial carcinoma, monoclonal antibody, VEG-F, HER-2, FGFR.Expert opinionOften used in combination with immunotherapy or other therapeutic agents, monoclonal antibody therapies have exhibited efficacy in mUC in early trials. Upcoming clinical trials will further explore their full clinical utility in treating mUC patients.

The familial aggregation of bladder cancers has been observed, but the incidence and association of familial bladder cancer with germline pathogenic and likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants is unknown.

Early progression on first-line (1L) platinum-based therapy or between therapy lines may be a surrogate of more aggressive disease and poor outcomes in advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC), but its prognostic role regarding immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) response and survival is unclear. We hypothesized that shorter time until start of second-line (2L) ICI would be associated with worse outcomes in aUC.

•An ambispective chart review of patients with la/mUC following PD-1/L1 therapy.•Following PD-1/L1 inhibitor discontinuation, only one third received subsequent treatment.•OS was longer in patients who received additional therapy following discontinuation of PD-1/L1 inhibitor.•Real-world outcomes in patients with la/mUC following PD-1/L1 therapy are poor.

Renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi) have been shown to improve outcomes in studies of multiple malignancies by effects on the tumor microenvironment to enhance the immune repertoire and improve drug delivery. Repurposing RASi to treat metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in combination with immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) may improve survival coupled with tolerability and cost efficacy. We evaluated the impact of RASi on outcomes in mRCC patients receiving ICI.

ABSTRACTIntroductionRenal cell carcinoma (RCC) accounts for 2.4% of cancers, with clear cell kidney cancer being the most common histologic subtype. Despite recent therapeutic advances, the prognosis for patients with advanced disease remains poor, with a 5-year survival rate of only 13.9% reported in the United States. Tivozanib is a novel inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor (VEGFR)-1, -2, and -3 and has recently been approved by the US FDA for use in patients with relapsed or recurrent advanced RCC following two or more prior systemic therapies.Areas coveredHere, the authors provide a review focusing on the development of tivozanib, compare tivozanib to other agents in the VEGFR inhibitor class, detail how tivozanib fits into current treatment landscape, and describe ongoing studies involving this agent.Expert opinionGiven tivozanib’s excellent safety profile and demonstrated clinical benefit in patients with pretreated disease, tivozanib is likely to be heavily utilized in the later-line setting. The ongoing TINIVO-2 study may further impact the treatment landscape by evaluating the use of tivozanib plus nivolumab in patients who have progressed on an immune checkpoint inhibitor.

The treatment landscape in invasive primary carcinoma of the urethra of urothelial histology closely aligns that of locally advanced urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. The survival benefit of perioperative chemotherapy for men undergoing radical surgery for primary urethral urothelial carcinoma (UUC) has not yet been well-elucidated.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) improve overall survival (OS) in patients with locally advanced, unresectable, or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (aUC), but response rates can be modest. We compared outcomes between patients with and without prior intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG), who received ICI for aUC, hypothesizing that prior intravesical BCG would be associated with worse outcomes.

The timely review by Drs. Cheetham and Petrylak in this issue of ONCOLOGY highlights emerging agents for the therapy of advanced urothelial carcinoma. [1] Since the development of first-line cisplatin-based [...]

Detecting genomic alterations (GAs) in advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC) can expand treatment options by identifying candidates for targeted therapies. Erdafitinib is FDA-approved for patients with platinum-refractory aUC with activating mutation or fusion in FGFR2/3. We explored the prevalence and spectrum of FGFR2/3GAs identified with plasma cfDNA NGS testing (Guardant360) in 997 patients with aUC. FGFR2/3GAs were detected in 201 patients (20%) with characterized activating GAs in 141 (14%). Our results indicate the Guardant360-based FGFR2/3GA detection rate is similar to those described from previous studies employing tumor tissue testing, suggesting that plasma-based cfDNA NGS may non-invasively identify candidates for anti-FGFR targeted therapies.

The objective of this study was to examine the overall survival (OS) in patients diagnosed with high-grade T1 non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer treated with early radical cystectomy versus local treatment of the primary tumor, defined as endoscopic management with or without intravesical chemotherapy or immunotherapy.

Cell-free circulating DNA (cfDNA) can be used for noninvasive profiling of tumor genomic aberrations. We hypothesized that molecular alterations may inform prognostication in advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC). We evaluated 124 aUC patients who underwent cfDNA analysis using a 73-gene sequencing panel (Guardant360). The association of molecular alterations and clinical factors with overall survival (OS) and failure-free-survival (FFS) was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional-hazards regression. The median age was 72yr, and 65 patients (52.4%) received prior therapy with platinum, 21 (17.1%) with a taxane, and ten (8.1%) with a PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor. At least one genomic alteration was detected in 112 patients (90.3%). The median number of alterations per sample was four (range 0–80). Commonly altered genes included TP53(54.8%), PIK3CA(24.2%), ARID1A(22.6%), ERBB2(19.4%), EGFR(16.1%), NF1(13.7%), RB1(12.9%), FGFR3(11.3%), BRAF(10.5%), BRCA1(10.5%), and RAF1(8.9%). BRCA1and RAF1alterations were associated with worse OS (hazard ratio [HR] 2.48; p=0.07; HR 4.87; p=0.007) and FFS (HR 2.35; p=0.016; HR 2.40; p=0.047). Poor Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status and the presence of visceral metastasis were associated with shorter OS; genomic evolution was observed. In conclusion, cfDNA molecular alterations were detected in most aUC patients. BRCA1and RAF1alterations were negatively prognostic, supporting further evaluation of DNA damage response and RAF kinase inhibitors.

Reliable biomarkers to predict the response of metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC) to programmed death-1 and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) inhibitors are being investigated. Texture analysis represents tumor heterogeneity and may serve as a predictor of response in mUC.

AbstractAims:Pembrolizumab demonstrated significantly prolonged overall survival (OS) vs. chemotherapy in the Phase III KEYNOTE-045 trial, and is approved in the US for the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) who progressed after platinum-based chemotherapy. Using longer follow-up and individual patient-data from KEYNOTE-045, this study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab vs. chemotherapy or atezolizumab from a US payer perspective.Materials and methods:A partitioned-survival model was developed over a 20-year time horizon. Progression-free survival (PFS) and OS for pembrolizumab and chemotherapy were extrapolated using a piecewise modelling approach, where patient-level data from KEYNOTE-045 were used for the initial period followed by parametric distributions. OS of atezolizumab was estimated by indirect treatment comparisons based on KEYNOTE-045 and IMvigor211. Different scenarios were explored in the absence of indirect comparisons on PFS and time-on-treatment (ToT) between pembrolizumab and atezolizumab. Drug acquisition/administration, disease management, adverse events, and terminal care costs were considered.Results:Compared with chemotherapy, pembrolizumab resulted in a mean gain of 1.33 life-years and 1.14 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and an incremental cost of $106,299, yielding an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $93,481/QALY gained. Pembrolizumab dominated atezolizumab in extending patients’ life by 0.89 years and 0.76 QALYs, while reducing costs by $26,458. Key drivers of cost-effectiveness included survival extrapolation, OS hazard ratio of pembrolizumab vs. atezolizumab, and time horizon. Pembrolizumab had a 66% and 100% probability of being cost-effective vs. chemotherapy and atezolizumab, respectively, at a $100,000 willingness-to-pay threshold.Limitations and conclusions:Uncertainties remain with extrapolated PFS and OS for pembrolizumab, OS indirect comparison, and ToT for atezolizumab. Despite these limitations, the model used robust methods to estimate key clinical endpoints with patient-level data from longer follow-up of KEYNOTE-045. Pembrolizumab dominates atezolizumab and is very likely cost-effective vs. chemotherapy in 2 L mUC at a $100,000 willingness-to-pay threshold.

Two phase 3 trials, COMET-1 and COMET-2, have reported that cabozantinib did not significantly extend overall survival (OS) compared to prednisone and prednisone plus mitoxantrone, respectively, in post-docetaxel patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). We conducted a retrospective analysis of a combined data set from these trials to identify a benefit in subsets of patients according to prognostic risk factors. The prognostic ability of factors to predict survival was evaluated using Cox proportional hazards regression models. Evaluation of potential beneficial subsets was performed using interaction terms between factors and cabozantinib. All tests were two-sided and p≤0.05 was considered statistically significant. A total of 1147 post-docetaxel patients with mCRPC were available (1028 from COMET-1 and 119 from COMET-2). The following factors were prognostic for OS: age, disease-free interval, hemoglobin, prostate-specific antigen, alkaline phosphatase, albumin, bone scan lesion area, lactate dehydrogenase, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, and pain (all p<0.05). There was no interaction effect on survival between cabozantinib versus comparator arms and any prognostic group. After adjusting for prognostic factors, cabozantinib was associated with better OS (hazard ratio 0.80, 95% confidence interval 0.67–0.95; p=0.012). Further investigation of cabozantinib in a better-powered trial or a rational patient population based on a molecular biomarker may be warranted.

Muscle-invasive urothelial cancers with TP53mutation were associated with higher frequency of nodal and osseous metastases; muscle-invasive urothelial cancers with high-risk mutations were associated with shorter metastasis-free and overall survival.

Penile squamous cell carcinoma (PSCC) is a rare malignancy with higher incidence in developing countries. Treatment options include surgery, radiation therapy, and systemic chemotherapy. However, effective treatments for advanced disease are lacking. To understand the biology underlying PSCC may help the development of new therapeutic strategies. The objective of this study was to evaluate immunohistochemical expression of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) and p16 in PSCC and its association with clinicopathologic features and outcomes.

Central nervous system (CNS) metastasis in patients with urothelial carcinoma (UC) is uncommon and poorly understood. We aimed to explore the clinical behavior and outcomes of this unique patient population.

Muscle-invasive bladder carcinomas (MIBCs) are aggressive genitourinary malignancies. Metastatic urothelial carcinoma of the bladder is generally incurable by current chemotherapy and leads to early mortality. Recent studies have identified molecular subtypes of MIBCs with different sensitivities to frontline therapy, suggesting tumor heterogeneity. We have performed multi-omic profiling of the kinome in bladder cancer patients with the goal of identify therapeutic targets. Our analyses revealed amplification, overexpression, and elevated kinase activity of P21 (RAC1) activated kinase 4 (PAK4) in a subset of Bladder cancer (BLCA). Using bladder cancer cells, we confirmed the role of PAK4 in BLCA cell proliferation and invasion. Furthermore, we observed that a PAK4 inhibitor was effective in curtailing growth of BLCA cells. Transcriptomic analyses identified elevated expression of another kinase, protein tyrosine kinase 6 (PTK6), upon treatment with a PAK4 inhibitor and RNA interference of PAK4. Treatment with a combination of kinase inhibitors (vandetanib and dasatinib) showed enhanced sensitivity compared with either drug alone. Thus, PAK4 may be therapeutically actionable for a subset of MIBC patients with amplified and/or overexpressed PAK4 in their tumors. Our results also indicate that combined inhibition of PAK4 and PTK6 may overcome resistance to PAK4. These observations warrant clinical investigations with selected BLCA patients.

Purpose: To date, there has not been a large, systematic evaluation of the prevalence of germline risk variants in urothelial carcinoma (UC). Methods: We evaluated the frequency of germline pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants in 1038 patients with high-risk UC who underwent targeted clinical germline testing. Case–control enrichment analysis was performed to screen for pathogenic variant enrichment in 17 DNA repair genes in 1038 UC patients relative to cancer-free individuals. Results: Among 1038 patients with UC, the cumulative frequency of patients with pathogenic variants was 24%; 18.6% of patients harbored =1 actionable germline variant with preventive or therapeutic utility. MSH2(34/969, 3.5%) and BRCA1/2(38/867, 4.4%) germline variants had the highest frequency. Germline variants in DNA damage repair genes accounted for 78% of pathogenic germline variants. Compared to the cancer-free cohort, UC patients had significant variant enrichment in MSH2(odds ratio [OR]: 15.4, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 7.1–32.7, p?&lt;?0.0001), MLH1(OR: 15.9, 95% CI: 4.4–67.7, p?&lt;?0.0001), BRCA2(OR: 5.7, 95% CI: 3.2–9.6, p?&lt;?0.0001), and ATM(OR: 3.8, 95% CI: 1.8–8.3, p?=?0.02). Conclusion: In this study, 24% of UC patients harbored pathogenic germline variants and 18.6% had clinically actionable variants. MLH1and MSH2were validated as UC risk genes while ATMand BRCA2were highlighted as potential UC predisposition genes. This work emphasizes the utility of germline testing in selected high-risk UC cohorts.

We conducted an analysis of immunohistochemical expression of multiple biomarkers in patients with metastatic (M) urothelial carcinoma (UC), including their prognostic effect in the setting of first-line chemotherapy. Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR)-3 and platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR)-α were associated with a divergent prognostic meaning. Present data do not support the use of immunohistochemistry (IHC) to select patients for clinical trials and highlight the hurdles of targeting angiogenesis in this field.

The renin-angiotensin system (RAS) has been demonstrated to modulate cell proliferation, desmoplasia, angiogenesis and immunosuppression. We examined the association of RAS inhibitors (RASi)—namely angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB)—with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) preceding radical cystectomy (RC).

In this retrospective analysis, complete remission (CR) of disease occurred in 1.8% of patients receiving salvage systemic therapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma. CR was strongly associated with longer survival, prior cisplatin therapy, and time from prior chemotherapy of ≥ 3 months. Agents inducing CR as salvage therapy should undergo further development, and tumors of patients showing CR should be selected for molecular profiling.

Longer time from previous perioperative chemotherapy (TFPC) ≥ 78 weeks and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) = 0 were independently prognostic for better survival with cisplatin-based first-line chemotherapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) after previous perioperative cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Because of particularly poor outcomes in those with TFPC < 52 weeks, the data support using TFPC ≥ 52 weeks to rechallenge with cisplatin-based first-line chemotherapy for metastatic disease.

Penile cancer is a rare malignancy with a poor prognosis. Studies with single-agent immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have demonstrated efficacy, but response rates are low. Studies combining ICIs with both chemotherapy and targeted therapy are ongoing. Up to 50% of penile cancer cases are associated with HPV. HPV-targeting therapies, such as HPV-targeting vaccines and T-cell receptor therapies, are an area of active investigation. Penile cancer cells also express cell surface antigens that may be targeted by the emerging class of antibody-drug conjugates. With many new treatments on the horizon, development of and access to clinical trials are key issues.

Cancer cells utilize vitamin folate to fulfill their excessive demand for nucleotides and amino acids. Dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR), an enzyme involved in folate metabolism converts dihydrofolate into tetrahydrofolate, which is required for the de novosynthesis of purines, and certain amino acids. DHFR inhibitors are used as a chemotherapeutic agent. Cancer sequencing analysis has identified additional enzymes in folate metabolism that are dysregulated in cancer. Methylenetetrahydrofolate dehydrogenase 1 like (MTHFD1L), one such enzyme is overexpressed in bladder cancer. MTHFD1L is a mitochondrial enzyme involved in the folate cycle by catalyzing the reaction of formyl-tetrahydrofolate to formate and tetrahydrofolate (THF). THF is crucial for de novopurine and thymidylate synthesis and is also involved in the regeneration of methionine. Cancer cells rely on purines derived from the de novopathway for the nucleotides whereas normal cells favor the salvage pathway. In this study we examined MTHFD1L expression in bladder cancer. By using publicly available cancer transcriptome data analysis web-portal UALCAN, we found overexpression of MTHFD1L in bladder cancer and expression was associated with overall survival. RT-PCR and immunoblot analysis confirmed the overexpression of MTHFD1L in muscle invasive bladder cancer tissues compared to normal urothelium. Furthermore, our investigations suggested a critical role for MTHFD1L in bladder cancer cell proliferation, colony formation and invasion. Thus, in this study, we show the significance of the folate metabolic enzyme MTHFD1L in aggressive bladder cancers and suggest that being an enzyme, MTHFD1L serves as a valuable therapeutic target.

ABSTRACTIntroduction: Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) consists of distinct clinical and biologic entities, with an urgent need for novel therapies targeting histology-specific molecular drivers of cancer growth. The MET pathway is now being targeted by multiple novel agents in clinical development. This review highlights the upcoming role of MET inhibition in the treatment of RCC.Areas covered: The HGF-MET axis is now recognized as playing a vital role in the growth of papillary histology and in driving VEGF inhibitor resistance. The heterogeneity of MET alterations influences sensitivity to MET inhibition and we need predictive biomarkers for improving patient selection. In this review, we highlight the role of the MET pathway in both clear cell and non-clear cell RCC and  provide a comprehensive review of preclinical and early clinical data on multiple drugs targeting the MET pathway.Expert opinion: MET alterations can act as primary or secondary drivers of tumor growth in RCC and represents a viable therapeutic target. Combination strategies of VEGF and MET inhibitors could lead to sustained and deep responses even in non-MET driven RCC by inhibiting pathways of VEGF resistance. Addition of checkpoint inhibitors to MET inhibition has also demonstrated promising signs of early efficacy.

ABSTRACTIntroduction: The conventional management of most patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC) is platinum-based chemotherapy followed by immunotherapy. Erdafitinib is an option in post-platinum patients with activating mutations in fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR)-3 and −2. Salvage therapy with taxanes or vinflunine has demonstrated minimal efficacy. Enfortumab Vedotin (EV), a monoclonal antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) targeting nectin-4 is under investigation in patients with advanced UC.Areas covered: This review describes the epidemiology and unmet needs of patients with metastatic UC and is focused specifically on heavily treated patients. We explore the rationale for targeting nectin 4 and the clinical development of EV; efficacy and safety data from the completed phase I and II studies are examined. Ongoing trials to definitively assess clinical outcomes in comparison to current therapy and trials exploring EV in combination are also highlighted.Expert opinion: There is an unmet need for new therapies in most patients with advanced UC and who progress after platinum and immunotherapy. EV has shown promising efficacy and safety in this population in phase 1 and 2 trials including those with poor prognostic factors such as liver metastases. Ongoing trials exploring this agent in combination will continue to advance the treatment of UC.

ABSTRACTIntroduction: Urothelial carcinoma is one of the most common cancers in the western world and, until recently, had limited therapeutic options. The contemporary advancement of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) has heralded a new era for these patients and represents a major shift in the evolving treatment landscape.Areas covered: This article provides a comprehensive summary of the currently available treatments for metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC). The authors also review ongoing, phase-III studies with novel therapeutic targets and highlight recent insights into tumor biology that may help better understand the disease.Expert opinion: The treatment landscape for first-line therapy of mUC continues to include platinum-based chemotherapy for patients who are eligible. While the approval of ICI has changed the management in those who are post-platinum or platinum-ineligible, the wider use of ICI in the first-line setting requires further clarity given recent FDA announcements. Maintaining the remarkable progress in mUC may depend upon ongoing phase-III studies evaluating treatment options beyond ICI. Better prognostication and identification of those unlikely to respond to ICI remain important unanswered questions, particularly as this class of agents moves further along the disease spectrum of non-metastatic UC.

Background: Despite a 5 to 20-fold higher risk of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) in people with HIV (PWH) than the general population, PWH were excluded from clinical trials that led to the approval of anti-PD-1 agents (PD-1) in HL. PD-1 have overall response rates (ORR) of 65-70% in the general population and are used in all lines of HL therapy. Several prospective and retrospective studies have shown PD-1 are safe in PWH, but they remain underutilized in HIV-associated HL (HIV-HL) where data are limited.

Improving early cancer detection has the potential to substantially reduce cancer-related mortality. Cell-free methylated DNA immunoprecipitation and high-throughput sequencing (cfMeDIP–seq) is a highly sensitive assay capable of detecting early-stage tumors. We report accurate classification of patients across all stages of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in plasma (area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve of 0.99) and demonstrate the validity of this assay to identify patients with RCC using urine cell-free DNA (cfDNA; AUROC of 0.86).

Intermediate endpoints are needed in early phase studies of men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) that can reliably predict success in phase 3 trials. Among men with measurable disease, objective response may provide information as to whether a treatment is likely to be successful. We conducted a systematic review of systemic agents that have proceeded to phase 3 trials in men with mCRPC and examined the relationship between improvements in measurable disease response in phase 2 trials and successful phase 3 trials leading to regulatory approval. Only trials that included men with radiographically measurable disease were included. We examined 31 eligible mCRPC phase 3 trials between 1992 and 2017 and 29 of the preceding phase 2 trials for RECIST responses. Measurable tumor responses in phase 2 trials were higher for successful therapies in phase 3 trials in chemotherapy-naive men with mCRPC, but were less correlated with success in trials investigating docetaxel combination regimens or the post chemotherapy mCRPC setting. Many failed agents did not produce higher than expected response rates over control arms; however, several agents such as anti-angiogenic therapies or orteronel produced higher than expected responses without survival benefit. Objective responses in men with mCRPC may be associated with prolonged survival, but this association is mechanism dependent and inconsistent across trials or disease states. These data support considering RECIST response as a supportive but not sole endpoint in phase 2 trials to support launching phase 3 trials.

Checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) are established as a standard therapy option for metastatic bladder cancer; however, their role in earlier-stage disease remains undefined.

Response and progression-free survival are unreliable in providing signals of benefit of new agents, especially immunotherapy, in nonrandomized phase 2 trials of salvage therapy for metastatic urothelial carcinoma. A nomogram that used baseline prognostic variables was developed to estimate the 12-month survival of patients receiving salvage chemotherapy to which observed survival of nonrandomized data sets could be compared to interpret results.

Please note, the synopsis was used from your supplied original manuscript, and not the accompanying abstract, per journal style: This article discusses current staging strategies in muscle-invasive bladder cancer and upper tract urothelial cell carcinoma. Current staging methods can help identify patients with localized or metastatic disease but are subject to limitations which must be considered.

Outcomes for patients with metastatic bladder cancer (mBC) are generally poor and progressively worse following first-line (1L) chemotherapy. To evaluate treatment patterns, survival outcomes, and characteristics of a large, real-world US population of elderly patients with advanced mBC receiving 1L and second-line (2L) treatment retrospectively. We identified patients with advanced mBC (aged ≥66 years)—newly diagnosed between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2011—in the National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program–Medicare linked database and assessed their palliative systemic chemotherapy treatments and survival outcomes. Of 1703 eligible patients, 42% received 1L chemotherapy; 1L-treated patients tended to be younger and healthier than nontreated patients. Only 27% of 1L-treated patients received cisplatin-based chemotherapy, most commonly cisplatin-gemcitabine. Cisplatin-treated patients were younger and had fewer comorbidities than non-cisplatin–treated patients. Thirty-five percent of 1L-treated patients subsequently received 2L chemotherapy. Patients received a variety of 2L agents as combination chemotherapy (52%) or single-agent chemotherapy (39%). Median overall survival durations in 1L-treated and 2L-treated patients were 8.5 and 7.9 months, respectively. Results from this retrospective SEER-Medicare database analysis underscore the historical inadequacies of 1L and 2L treatments in elderly patients with advanced mBC. Few patients were treated with 1L chemotherapy, a minority of whom received 1L cisplatin-based chemotherapy, and even fewer received 2L chemotherapy. These findings highlight the disconnect between 1L treatment in clinical trials and treatment in the real-world setting and the lack of standard approaches to 2L treatment in the United States.