Search

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (E.R.A.S.) is a multimodal, evidence-based and patient-centered pathway designed to minimize surgical stress, enhancing recovery and improving perioperative outcomes. However, considering that the potential clinical implication of E.R.A.S. on patients undergoing video-assisted thoracic surgery (V.A.T.S.) has not properly defined, we proposed to implement our minimally invasive program with a specific clinical pathway able to enhance recovery after lung resection. Aim of this study was to assess the impact of this integrated program of Enhanced Pathway of Care (E.P.C.) in Uniportal V.A.T.S. patients undergoing lung resection, in terms of efficiency and safety. We conducted a retrospective, observational study enrolling patients undergoing uniportal V.A.T.S. resections from January 2015 to May 2020. Two groups were created: pre-E.P.C. and E.P.C. Propensity score matching analysis was performed to evaluate length of stay (LOS), postoperative cardiopulmonary complications (CPC) and readmission rate (READM). We analyzed 1167 patients (E.P.C. group: 182; pre-E.P.C. group: 985). E.P.C. group has a mean LOS shorter compared to pre-E.P.C. group (3.13 vs 4.19 days, p< 0.0001) without increasing on CPC (E.P.C. 12% vs pre-E.P.C. 11%, p= 0.74) and READM rate (E.P.C. 1.6% vs pre-E.P.C. 4.9%, p= 0.07). In particular, the LOS was shortened in the E.P.C. patients submitted to lobectomy, segmentectomy and wedge resection. Moreover, the three subgroups had similar CPC and READM rates for E.P.C. and control patients. In conclusion, this study demonstrated the benefits and safety of E.P.C. program showing a reduction of LOS for patients undergoing uniportal V.A.T.S. resection.

We treated an 89-year-old patient affected by a descending thoracic aorta lesion due to a rib fracture with a penetrating costal stump. An urgent combined thoracic and endovascular surgical approach was performed, removing the rib fragment and positioning an aortic endoprosthesis simultaneously. Postoperative angio-computed tomography scan demonstrated the correct position of the endoprosthesis without any leakage or periaortic hemorrhage.

Aim and background To determine whether female patients operated on for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have a survival advantage compared to male patients.Methods and study design We analyzed data from 1,426 prospectively collected patients submitted to lung resection for NSCLC between 1999 and 2008.Results Two groups, including 1,014 male and 412 female patients, were compared. Female patients were significantly younger, were more frequently asymptomatic, were less likely to be smokers, had better preoperative respiratory function, had a lower frequency of COPD, and were less commonly affected by cardiovascular comorbidity than men. Adenocarcinoma was more frequently present and early pathological stage (stage IA) more frequently detected in women at diagnosis. The operative mortality was significantly lower among women (1.6% vs 4.6%) (P = 0.012), and women underwent significantly more segmentectomies and fewer pneumonectomies (P = 0.001). The disease-related 5-year survival rate was significantly higher in women (66% vs 51%) (P= 0.0008). At univariate analysis the absence of symptoms at presentation, lower pathological stage, squamous cell type, and female gender were positive factors influencing long-term survival. At multivariate analysis low pathological stage, squamous cell type and female gender were confirmed as independent positive prognostic predictors. Women had a significant survival advantage irrespective of the histological subtype at pathological stage IA, IB, IIB and IIIA disease (P <0.05).Conclusions Female gender was confirmed to be a particular subset amongst patients affected by NSCLC and exerted a positive effect on disease-related survival of patients submitted to surgical resection. This important effect of gender should be cautiously kept in mind in analyzing the results of current and future trials for lung cancer therapy.