Search

The synthesis of serotonin at CNS level is influenced by diet. Moreover, insulin resistance is associated with lower serotonin levels. Visceral obesity, strictly linked to hepatic steatosis is specifically associated with mild to severe somatic affective-depressive symptom clusters. Previous data support the view that depression involves serotonergic systems, reflecting low levels of urinary 5- hydroxy-3-indoleacetic acid (5-HIAA). The 24-h urinary excretion of 5-HIAA was evaluated in 76 dystimic/depressed, obese/overweight females, divided into two groups, i.e., on a hyper-caloric diet, associated with a life style characterized by leisure time sedentary behavior (LTSB, 35 women), or on a normo-caloric diet, assisted by program-based strategies aimed at promoting physical activity participation (PAP, 41 women). Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) was carried out to score the severity of dystimia/depression. Anthropometric measures, metabolic indices, severity of hepatic steatosis at sonography and HOMA were studied. Urinary levels of 5-HIAA in controls and PAP groups were comparable with a great overlap, while in the LTSB group the urinary excretion of 5-HIAA was significantly reduced in respect to that of the PAP group and obviously compared to that of the control group, 3.4±1.4 mg/L versus 6.2±2.7 mg/L and 6.4±2.6 mg/L, respectively, ANOVA test, P= 0.001. Among metabolic indices, cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, triglycerides and uric acid were not able to predict urinary concentrations of 5-HIAA, which were not associated with hepatic steatosis; vice versa, ferritin levels, and mainly HOMA values, were independent predictors of the urinary excretion of 5-HIAA (β=0.235 and 0.45, respectively). Dystimia/depression severity was negatively predicted by urinary 5-HIAA levels in the sense that the highest BDI values were forecast by the lowest values of urinary 5-HIAA (β= −0.72). The importance of measuring the 24-h urinary excretion of 5-HIAA in follow-ups could rely on a method simultaneously mirroring the well-being status, the adherence to physical activity, which leads to improved insulin sensitivity, and the eating habits acquired by dystimic/depressed overweight/obese patients. In contrast, the significance of the urinary 5-HIAA is reduced in evaluating the severity of hepatic steatosis, likely because it is a structured process.

Immunosuppression has improved graft and recipient survival in transplantation but is associated with possible adverse effects including cardiovascular diseases. The impact of tacrolimus on the lipidic profile has been debated for several years. Twenty-nine kidney transplant recipients on tacrolimus treatment were monitored for six years, and multiple laboratory parameters investigating the lipid asset, as well as glucose profile, were carried out. Tacrolimus has been responsible for significant changes in plasma lipid concentrations only for the first six months, but not for the remaining time of observation. Similarly, in the same periods, glycemic imbalance was highlighted. The liver enzyme activity showed a modest derangement during the tacrolimus treatment, suggesting the presence of lipid accumulation in the liver. Fatty liver reversed in the long term follow-up. Tacrolimus, although it is not a completely safe option in the first months of the immunosuppressive protocols in organ transplanted recipients, still retains a certain role in the long-term post-transplantation immunosuppressive approach with high cardiovascular risks

The possible cross-reactivity of immunoassays with structurally-related drugs was investigated. Innofluor® Certican® (FPIA) calibrators were measured by using IMx® Sirolimus assay (MEIA) and MEIA Sirolimus calibrators were analysed by using FPIA Certican® assay. Drug concentrations were measured in 95 and 100 samples from renal transplanted patients (RTP) on sirolimus or everolimus treatment by using immunoassays and LC/ESI-MSMS. A high cross-reactivity was found both for MEIA and FPIA. High correlation degrees, confirmed by the Bland-Altman and the Eksborg tests, were found between drug concentrations measured in real samples by both immunoassays (r=0.909 and r=0.970, respectively). LC/ESI-MSMS analysis of samples containing sirolimus showed no positivity for everolimus. Similarly, samples from patients on treatment with everolimus resulted negative as far as regards sirolimus. MEIA and FPIA could be considered mutually reliable and accurate alternatives for the specific-drug immunoassay. It should be noticed that in patients switching from one drug to the other unreal overestimation of the blood levels of the current administered immunosuppressant can occur.

The measurement of blood concentration of immunosuppressive drugs is strongly recommended because of the narrow therapeutic range. An important aspect in the therapeutic monitoring of a drug is its possible degradation. This paper is aimed at investigating the stability of two widely-used immunosuppressants, sirolimus and everolimus. Short (storage at 30°C for 3 or 7 days) and long term (storage at −20°C for 0–90 days with a single freeze-thaw cycle) stability of sirolimus and everolimus in whole blood samples from kidney transplant patients were examined by using MEIA and FPIA. Sirolimus and everolimus samples stored at 30°C in light for up to a week showed a decrement in concentration of 5.2% and 6.1%, respectively. Our findings on long term stability for both sirolimus and everolimus highlight the possibility of storing samples at −20 °C for up to 90 days, without the need to use lower storage temperatures. The results have important implications for patients living far from laboratories where drug concentration is measured or when the storing of blood samples is needed for pharmacokinetic studies.