Search

The clinical interest in HER-2/neu is related to trastuzumab, a drug used to treat patients with invasive breast carcinoma overexpressing the HER-2/neu protein. It is very important to correctly identify those patients who may benefit from trastuzumab by accurate assessment of the HER-2/neu status. Of the various methods available, the Dako Herceptest for immunohistochemical assay is considered the most reliable to reach this goal. The aim of this study was to investigate within a group of Italian laboratories the reproducibility of the results of HER-2/neu assessment by means of the Dako scoring system on slides stained with the Herceptest kit. This study was also conceived as the continuation of one of our previous studies, which was similar in its aims but different in the classification criteria adopted. Our results show that, whereas the intra-observer reproducibility was generally satisfactory, the interobserver reproducibility was not. Moreover, our findings confirm that the two extreme classes (0 and 3+) are more easy to identify than the other two and that the Herceptest does not allow to discriminate optimally between scoring classes 2+ and 3+. These findings are relevant in clinical practice where the treatment choice is based on categories defined by this assay, suggesting the need of adopting educational programs and/or new reference materials to improve the assay performance.

In this study, we retrospectively evaluated the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and microvessel density (MVD) in 228 and 213 specimens, respectively, from stages I and II breast cancer patients (pts) enrolled in a randomized phase III adjuvant chemotherapy trial comparing epirubicin to CMF, while tamoxifen was given to all postmenopausal pts. The expression of VEGF and MVD was assessed on tissue sections formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded by immunohistochemical staining using anti-VEGF antibody of human origin and anti-CD34 monoclonal antibody. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed using chi squared test, log-rank test and Cox's regression model. Sixty four of 228 pts were classified as VEGF positive (28%) with no significant difference in the two treatment arms. In 213 pts evaluated for CD34, 103 pts (48%) were classified as MVD high. No significant association between VEGF and MVD was found, and neither were they correlated with many known prognostic factors such as age, tumor size, nodal status, and histological grade. The only significant correlations observed were between VEGF and estrogen receptor (ER) status (p= 0.013) and between MVD and HER2 overexpression (p= 0.023). At a median follow up of 96 months VEGF and MVD were not correlated with relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in all pts and in pts assigned to one of the two treatment arms. In conclusion, VEGF and MVD retrospectively evaluated, cannot be considered prognostic factors in node negative (N−) high risk and node positive (N+) breast cancer pts treated with two different regimens of adjuvant chemotherapy.