Search

ABSTRACTResistance to the 2′-F-2′-C-methylguanosine monophosphate nucleotide hepatitis C virus (HCV) inhibitors PSI-352938 and PSI-353661 was associated with a combination of amino acid changes (changes of S to G at position 15 [S15G], C223H, and V321I) within the genotype 2a nonstructural protein 5B (NS5B), an RNA-dependent RNA polymerase. To understand the role of these residues in viral replication, we examined the effects of single and multiple point mutations on replication fitness and inhibition by a series of nucleotide analog inhibitors. An acidic residue at position 15 reduced replicon fitness, consistent with its proximity to the RNA template. A change of the residue at position 223 to an acidic or large residue reduced replicon fitness, consistent with its proposed proximity to the incoming nucleoside triphosphate (NTP). A change of the residue at position 321 to a charged residue was not tolerated, consistent with its position within a hydrophobic cavity. This triple resistance mutation was specific to both genotype 2a virus and 2′-F-2′-C-methylguanosine inhibitors. A crystal structure of the NS5B S15G/C223H/V321I mutant of the JFH-1 isolate exhibited rearrangement to a conformation potentially consistent with short primer-template RNA binding, which could suggest a mechanism of resistance accomplished through a change in the NS5B conformation, which was better tolerated by genotype 2a virus than by viruses of other genotypes.

The estrogen‐related receptor α (ERRα) was one of the first orphan receptors identified through a search for genes encoding proteins related to the steroid nuclear receptor, Estrogen Receptor α (ERα). The physiological role of ERRα has not yet been established nor has a natural ligand been elucidated. Importantly, research indicates that ERRα may be a novel drug target to treat breast cancer and/or metabolic disorders. A homogeneous time‐resolved fluorescence (HTRF) assay has been developed to screen for ERRα‐specific antagonists. This assay uses the ERR ligand binding domain and the coactivator interaction domain of Proliferator‐activated Receptor γ Coactivator‐1α (PGC‐1α) to examine the ability of compounds to antagonize the constitutive interaction between ERRα and the coactivator. A dissociation‐enhanced lanthanide fluorescence immunoassay (DELFIA) was also created to counter screen compounds identified in the HTRF screen. Here we report the discovery of high‐affinity ERRα subtype selective antagonists. Additionally, a homology model of ERRα in an antagonist conformation has been developed and after subsequent docking studies, we offer a model showing the molecular determinants that suggest why our novel tri‐cyclic antagonist, N‐[(2Z)‐3‐(4,5‐dihydro‐1,3‐thiazol‐2‐yl)‐1,3‐thiazolidin‐2‐yl idene]‐5 H dibenzo[a,d][7]annulen‐5‐amine, binds to ERRα with high affinity but does not bind to either ERRβ or ERRγ. Drug Dev Res 69:203–218, 2008. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Despite their proven antidiabetic efficacy, widespread use of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)gamma agonists has been limited by adverse cardiovascular effects. To overcome this shortcoming, selective PPARgamma modulators (SPPARgammaMs) have been identified that have antidiabetic efficacy comparable with full agonists with improved tolerability in preclinical species. The results of structural studies support the proposition that SPPARgammaMs interact with PPARgamma differently from full agonists, thereby providing a physical basis for their novel activities. Herein, we describe a novel PPARgamma ligand, SPPARgammaM2. This compound was a partial agonist in a cell-based transcriptional activity assay, with diminished adipogenic activity and an attenuated gene signature in cultured human adipocytes. X-ray cocrystallography studies demonstrated that, unlike rosiglitazone, SPPARgammaM2 did not interact with the Tyr473 residue located within helix 12 of the ligand binding domain (LBD). Instead, SPPARgammaM2 was found to bind to and activate human PPARgamma in which the Tyr473 residue had been mutated to alanine (hPPARgammaY473A), with potencies similar to those observed with the wild-type receptor (hPPARgammaWT). In additional studies, we found that the intrinsic binding and functional potencies of structurally distinct SPPARgammaMs were not diminished by the Y473A mutation, whereas those of various thiazolidinedione (TZD) and non-TZD PPARgamma full agonists were reduced in a correlative manner. These results directly demonstrate the important role of Tyr473 in mediating the interaction of full agonists but not SPPARgammaMs with the PPARgamma LBD, thereby providing a precise molecular determinant for their differing pharmacologies.

This report describes the evaluation of a wide range of structurally diverse “privileged structures”, either amines or acids, linked via urea and amide connections, to the key dipeptide D-Trp-Lys-OMe. This led to the discovery of a collection of potent and structurally distinct SSTR2 ligands in both the amide and urea series. The 4- (benzimidazolone)-piperidine linked SSTR2 agonist (8) is highlighted.

Melanocortin receptor 4 (MC-4R) is involved in the regulation of energy balance and body weight, and recognizes α-, β-, and γ-melanocyte stimulating hormones (α-, β-, γ-MSH). In the search for compounds that regulate food intake and body weight, two synthetic lactam-derivative ligands of α-MSH were discovered, MTII and SHU9119. MTII is an agonist and reduces food intake in rats, whereas SHU9119 is an antagonist, and increases food intake and body weight in rats. MTII and SHU9119 are nonselective compounds to MC-4R. To enhance the potency and selectivity at the human MC-4R (hMC-4R), we recently synthesized analogs of SHU9119 (M. A. Bednarek, T. MacNeil, R. N. Kalyani, R. Tang, Van der L. H. T. Ploeg, and D. H. Weinberg, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 2001, Vol. 44, pp. 401–409), wherein compound 1 was the most selective for hMC-4R. Replacement of D-Nal by L-Nal in compound 1 made compound 2 weakly active. Comparison of the structures by NMR and molecular modeling of compounds 1 and 2 vs SHU9119 and MTII indicated that, even though they existed as an average of several conformations in solution, there were distinctions in their structures. The γ-methylene protons of Arg in compound 1 were nonequivalent and shielded probably by the aromatic ring of Nal. The NHi–NHi+1 NOE cross peaks and the temperature coefficients of the amide protons around the “essential core” Nal/Phe7–Arg8–Trp9, required for high affinity and high selectivity at hMC-4R, were indicative of a possible turn structure for these compounds but with differences in their NOE strengths and temperature coefficient values. Molecular modeling of these compounds based on their NMR data showed that the essential core appeared as a “V” shape with two different orientations, one for compound 1 and some of the conformers of SHU9119 and MTII, and the other for compound 2 and some other conformers of SHU9119 and MTII. The remaining conformers of SHU9119 and MTII, which did not map to compound 1 or 2, suggested that they were outside of the hMC-4R binding envelop. These observations may lead to conjectures as to why compound 1 is highly active and selective toward hMC-4R. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Biopolymers 68: 512–527, 2003

For Abstract see ChemInform Abstract in Full Text.

For Abstract see ChemInform Abstract in Full Text.

ChemInform is a weekly Abstracting Service, delivering concise information at a glance that was extracted from about 100 leading journals. To access a ChemInform Abstract of an article which was published elsewhere, please select a “Full Text” option. The original article is trackable via the “References” option.