Search

Predicting dry matter intake (DMI) for beef cattle on extensive rangelands presents a significant challenge to determining stocking rates. Traditionally, DMI is estimated by taking full body weight (BW) multiplied by a percentage selected based on animal class, production phase, and forage quality, which introduces tremendous levels of accumulated error at the herd level. Animal Unit Months (AUMs) are utilized to simplify the determination of stocking rate (animal units per area per a specific period of time) of pastures. This challenge represents a tremendous opportunity to leverage precision technology to account for individual animal variation in BW and growth, with subsequent impacts on herd-level decisions. Therefore, the objective of this study was to utilize precision livestock technology (PLT) collected data to build a precision system model (PSM) to evaluate the differences in predicted DMI using either initial BW, expected mid-season BW, or PLT measured BW. The PSM model was built utilizing BW data measured using SmartScale (C-Lock Inc.) for 60 days during the summers of 2021 and 2022 on Angus yearling steers (average initial BW 393.71 ± 39.01 and 315.23 ± 53.91 kg, n = 130 and 124, for year 2021 and 2022, respectively) on native pastures at the South Dakota State University Cottonwood Field Station. The PSM evaluated total forage consumption and deterministically estimated hectares of pasture required to meet the herd forage demands relative to available biomass (kg/ha). the PSM estimated 4.49% and 6.94% more DMI at the herd level compared with using initial BW for years 2021 and 22, respectively, and 1.64% less DMI than mid-season BW in 2021. This resulted in an additional 14.03 and 17.95 ha required for years 2021 and 22, respectively, according to PSM estimates compared with initial BW, while animals were understocked by 5 and 0.3 ha for 2021 and 2022, respectively, using mid-season BW. Individuals expressed a divergent growth rate, resulting in greater misalignment between static and PSM predicted DMI as the grazing period progressed (Menendez et al., 2023), indicating greater opportunities for targeted grazing management in long grazing periods. Therefore, applying precision data provides more precise DMI estimates and demonstrates the advantages and disadvantages of herd-level estimates. The use of PSM helps to identify high-leverage precision tools to minimize a performance gap like overgrazing extensive rangeland systems and demonstrates the critical need to develop robust data-collection and processing steps to leverage continuously collected PLT data.

Attaining sustainability of livestock production and understanding environmental synergies requires in-depth knowledge of grazing animal growth and behavior. A pilot study (2021-22) was conducted at the South Dakota State University Cottonwood Field Station as part of a broader project to evaluate precision livestock technology and environmental synergies on native rangelands. Yearling Angus steers (n = 262) were fitted with virtual fencing collars (Vence), weighed on a traditional chute scale, and allocated to one of six native grass pastures equipped with individual weighing (SmartScale) scales at the water source. Each pasture was assigned either Rotational (RG) or Continuous (CG) grazing strategy and one of three stocking rates (Low, Medium, and High, 0.3, 0.42, and 0.7 AUMs, respectively) in a 2x3 factorial design. The data were downloaded, (Rcore Team, 2023), and spurious weights identified and removed using Robust Regression (hwts > 0.99, Parsons et al. 2023). Effects of stocking rate and grazing strategy were analyzed on water visits, time spent drinking, and growth using a linear mixed effects model to calculate effect sizes. Differences between BW and ADG calculated using the smart-scale vs. traditional chute weights were evaluated using a paired t-test. Steers visited the smart-scale 3.44 ± 2.79 visits per day, with significant effect of RG vs. CG strategies (3.65 ± 0.09 vs. 2.89 ± 0.10 visits per day respectively, P< 0.05). Total water visit duration averaged 5.04 ± 7.58 minutes per day, with most visits occurring between 0600 and 2000 hours and no observations occurring between 2000 and 0000 hours. RG managed steers exhibited significantly higher water visit duration (5.28 ± 0.308 vs 4.16 ± 0.317 minutes/day, P< 0.05) compared with CG managed steers. Smartscale measured weights were significantly heavier than chute weights at the beginning and end of the study period, (7.47 ± 24.54 and 9.77 ± 46.25 kg respectively, P< 0.05). No differences in overall ADG were found between smartscale and traditional chute weights(P> 0.58), however, significant temporal interactions occurred (P <0.05), which demonstrates that ADG varied over the trial duration. This created significant discrepancies in predicted vs. actual stocking rates in heavy stocked pastures (0.84 AUM, P< 0.05), indicating pastures exceeded their target stocking rate. Overall, we found steers readily acclimated to smart-scale weighing systems, and creates a viable technology to monitor watering behavior, real-time body weight, and ADG in extensively managed cattle. Further, we showed RG vs CG grazing strategies significantly affect animal drinking behavior, while stocking rate resulted in inequalities between expected vs. actual assigned animal unit months. Precision livestock technologies offer a vital solution towards enhancing sustainable livestock management practices and improving nutrition and modeling in extensive rangeland systems.

Today’s livestock producers face increasing public scrutiny because animal agriculture is often cited as a major contributor to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. However, this negative perception does not take into account the carbon (C) sequestration benefits of grazing livestock nor that grazing lands account for 25% of the global soil sequestration potential of soil C storage. Grazing beef cattle and bison are key to healthy grassland ecosystems and provide the most nutrient dense source of protein available for human consumption. Beef and bison producers who graze their livestock are widely recognized as environmental stewards because they use sustainable grazing practices that maintain grassland health. These practices are considered climate-smart agriculture (CSA) because they promote soil C sequestration and resilience to increased climate variability. Yet, these same producers are generally overlooked in GHG reduction and C sequestration incentives because of a relative lack of cost-effective methods to measure C and GHG sinks and sources. Emerging technologies are beginning to bridge that gap by paving the way to develop, implement, and monitor CSA practices. Furthermore, rangelands in the U.S. dedicated to supporting forage-based livestock production amount to nearly 940 million acres. This is more than double the acres dedicated to row crops and represents enormous potential to contribute to U.S. climate change commitments. Successful implementation and monitoring of CSA land management practices creates potential to develop climate-smart livestock commodities that sustainably provide economic incentives to producers operating resilient livestock grazing systems. Recently, South Dakota State University, along with ten external partners, was awarded a CSA commodity development grant by the USDA and NRCS focused on CSA-raised grazing beef cattle and bison in the Northern Great Plains. Specific objectives include: 1) developing and implementing existing and novel CSA practices alongside custom grazing plans; 2) measuring, monitoring, reporting, and verifying CSA practice impacts on GHG emissions, C sequestration, and ecosystem biodiversity of plants, arthropods, and wildlife; and 3) creating sustainable, value-added market opportunities for producers using CSA practices. To achieve these objectives, the project team is partnering with producers throughout the Northern Great Plains and beyond and will provide incentives for CSA practice implementation. Additionally, emerging and novel technologies will be used to collect large-scale data across producer operations and test sites to determine and refine GHG and C sequestration estimates associated with range beef cattle and bison systems. The long-term goal of this project is to provide CSA beef and bison producers with sustainable, value-added market opportunities that align with consumer preferences and demand.

Despite recent improvements in overall soil health gained through conservation agriculture, which has become a global priority in agricultural systems, soil and water-related externalities (e.g., wind and water erosion) continue to persist or worsen. Using an inductive, systems approach, we tested the hypothesis that such externalities persist due to expansion of cultivation onto areas unsuitable for sustained production. To test this hypothesis, a variety of data sources and analyses were used to uncover the land and water resource dynamics underlying noteworthy cases of soil erosion (either wind or water) and hydrological effects (e.g., flooding, shifting hydrographs) throughout the central United States. Given the evidence, we failed to reject the hypothesis that cultivation expansion is contributing to increased soil and water externalities, since significant increases in cultivation on soils with severe erosion limitations were observed everywhere the externalities were documented. We discuss the case study results in terms of land use incentives (e.g., policy, economic, and biophysical), developing concepts of soil security, and ways to utilize case studies such as those presented to better communicate the value of soil and water resource conservation. Incorporating the tenets of soil potential and soil risk into soil health evaluations and cultivation decision-making is needed to better match the soil resource with land use and help avoid more extreme soil and water-related externalities.

Advancements in precision livestock technology have resulted in an unprecedented amount of data being collected on individual animals. Throughout the data analysis chain, many bottlenecks occur, including processing raw sensor data, integrating multiple streams of information, incorporating data into animal growth and nutrition models, developing decision support tools for producers, and training animal science students as data scientists. To realize the promise of precision livestock management technologies, open-source tools and tutorials must be developed to reduce these bottlenecks, which are a direct result of the tremendous time and effort required to create data pipelines from scratch. Open-source programming languages (e.g., R or Python) can provide users with tools to automate many data processing steps for cleaning, aggregating, and integrating data. However, the steps from data collection to training artificial intelligence models and integrating predictions into mathematical models can be tedious for those new to statistical programming, with few examples pertaining to animal science. To address this issue, we outline how open-source code can help overcome many of the bottlenecks that occur in the era of big data and precision livestock technology, with an emphasis on how routine use and publication of open-source code can help facilitate training the next generation of animal scientists. In addition, two case studies are presented with publicly available data and code to demonstrate how open-source tutorials can be utilized to streamline data processing, train machine learning models, integrate with animal nutrition models, and facilitate learning. The National Animal Nutrition Program focuses on providing research-based data on animal performance and feeding strategies. Open-source data and code repositories with examples specific to animal science can help create a reinforcing mechanism aimed at advancing animal science research.In the era of big data and artificial learning, developing open-source examples specific to animal science is essential to train the next-generation workforce to realize the potential of precision livestock management technology fully.Livestock production is undergoing a new revolution of incorporating advanced technology to inform animal management. As more and more technologies come to market, new challenges arise with developing a workforce trained to handle big datasets generated from these technologies and turning datasets into insight for livestock producers. This can be especially challenging as multiple data streams ranging from climate and weather information to real-time metrics on animal performance need to be efficiently processed and incorporated into animal production models. Open-source code is one possible solution to these challenges because it is designed to be made publicly available so any user can view, alter, and improve upon existing code. This paper aims to highlight how open-source code can help address many of the challenges of precision livestock technology, including efficient data processing, data integration, development of decision tools, and training of future animal scientists. In addition, the need for open-source tutorials and datasets specific to animal science are included to help facilitate greater adoption of open science.

Much work has been done to understand and improve soil and water conservation where agriculture has driven land use intensification. Less is known about soil- and water-related impacts from intensification driven by solar farming, especially at watershed-scales. Here we employed Hydrologic Engineering Center's Hydrologic Modeling System (HEC-HMS) to model Pond Creek, a rural watershed in Texas, USA. Land use is primarily crop cultivation and secondarily pasture for cattle grazing. Presently, several industrial-scale projects are planned to convert ≈15–30% of Pond Creek from agriculture to solar farms. The model was parameterized using public data sources and information from local stakeholders, then calibrated to several historical precipitation events. Experiments were conducted by varying precipitation depth, duration, and land uses: native vegetation pre-cultivation (control), cultivation (current), current conditions with 15% solar farm conversion (solar), and current conditions with 30% solar farm conversion (solar x2). Shifting to solar farming led to significant increases in cumulative sediment load (+12%–30%), with no significant differences in peak discharge rate changes (+0.38%–4%). Comparison to soil loss tolerance values showed current and solar treatment erosion rates exceeded tolerance values between 0.17 and 2.29 tons per hectare and all treatments were significantly different than the native treatment. We discuss high leverage strategies applicable to solar farm development sites as well as watersheds where they reside. Accelerating demand for land for renewable energy such as solar farming warrants greater attention from the soil and water conservation community to anticipate and mitigate impacts across landscapes.

Approximately 40% of the land use within the Northern Great Plains is dedicated to livestock production, with much of the 89.9 million head of cattle and calves in the U.S. concentrated in this area. Precision livestock management has ushered in a new era of sensors and technology to monitor individual animal’s health, reproductive, and nutritional status in real-time to improve efficiency. Despite these advances, most of the research has been conducted on dairy operations or within feedlot settings. Incorporation on extensive rangeland production systems remains relatively absent (Brennan et al., 2021). This is primarily due to difficulties in studying animals on rangelands caused by heterogeneity of forage resources, variable environmental conditions, and challenges associated with accessing information across vast distances, often without cellular or internet connection. Advances in communication technology are increasingly connecting remote areas, creating new opportunities to improve livestock production efficiency on extensive rangelands using precision technology. Numerous challenges still exist, including applying and integrating multiple technologies across platforms, effectiveness in a real-world setting, technical skills, and knowledge to utilize real-time data, and achieving economic return for livestock producers. Specifically, we discuss the application of precision technologies and mathematical models for improving ruminant nutrition in rangeland systems (Menendez and Tedeschi, 2020). Opportunities exist to refine or develop the next generation of equations/models that more adequately represent nutrient dynamics such as diet selection, supplementation, movement, behavior, water intake, feed conversion efficiency, heat/cold stress, and gain on an individual animal basis. However, effective adoption and adaptability of new technologies/data analytics merit the consideration of potential intended-and-unintended consequences, such as producer dependency on complex hardware and software systems. Hence, precision capabilities coupled with mathematical models are likely the next step to substantially enhance livestock performance in extensive systems when coupled with feasible and reliable long-term strategies.

Modern animal scientists, industry, and managers have never faced a more complex world. Precision livestock technologies have altered management in confined operations to meet production, environmental, and consumer goals. Applications of precision technologies have been limited in extensive systems such as rangelands due to lack of infrastructure, electrical power, communication, and durability. However, advancements in technology have helped to overcome many of these challenges. Investment in precision technologies is growing within the livestock sector, requiring the need to assess opportunities and challenges associated with implementation to enhance livestock production systems. In this review, precision livestock farming and digital livestock farming are explained in the context of a logical and iterative five-step process to successfully integrate precision livestock measurement and management tools, emphasizing the need for precision system models (PSMs). This five-step process acts as a guide to realize anticipated benefits from precision technologies and avoid unintended consequences. Consequently, the synthesis of precision livestock and modeling examples and key case studies help highlight past challenges and current opportunities within confined and extensive systems. Successfully developing PSM requires appropriate model(s) selection that aligns with desired management goals and precision technology capabilities. Therefore, it is imperative to consider the entire system to ensure that precision technology integration achieves desired goals while remaining economically and managerially sustainable. Achieving long-term success using precision technology requires the next generation of animal scientists to obtain additional skills to keep up with the rapid pace of technology innovation. Building workforce capacity and synergistic relationships between research, industry, and managers will be critical. As the process of precision technology adoption continues in more challenging and harsh, extensive systems, it is likely that confined operations will benefit from required advances in precision technology and PSMs, ultimately strengthening the benefits from precision technology to achieve short- and long-term goals.Interest and investment in precision technologies are growing within the livestock sector. Though these technologies offer many promises of increased efficiency and reduced inputs, there is a need to assess the opportunities and challenges associated with precision technology implementation in livestock production systems. In this review, precision livestock measurement and management tools are explained in the context of a logical and iterative five-step process that highlights the need for systems computer modeling to realize anticipated benefits from these technologies and avoid unintended consequences. This review includes key case studies to highlight past challenges and current opportunities within operations that house animals in a central area or building with sufficient infrastructure (confined livestock production systems) and other operation settings that utilize large grasslands that contain far less infrastructure (extensive livestock production systems). The key to precision livestock management success is training the next generation of animal scientists in computer modeling, precision technologies, computer programming, and data science while still being grounded in traditional animal science principles.Precision technology is rapidly being implemented in confined and extensive livestock production systems. Understanding what has been done is critical to successful short- and long-term gains in multifaceted and complex animal–plant–soil–water systems, requiring effective integration of precision system models.

The field of animal science, and especially animal nutrition, relies heavily on modeling to accomplish its day-to-day objectives. New data streams (“big data”) and the exponential increase in computing power have allowed the appearance of “new” modeling methodologies, under the umbrella of artificial intelligence (AI). However, many of these modeling methodologies have been around for decades. According to Gartner, technological innovation follows five distinct phases: technology trigger, peak of inflated expectations, trough of disillusionment, slope of enlightenment, and plateau of productivity. The appearance of AI certainly elicited much hype within agriculture leading to overpromised plug-and-play solutions in a field heavily dependent on custom solutions. The threat of failure can become real when advertising a disruptive innovation as sustainable. This does not mean that we need to abandon AI models. What is most necessary is to demystify the field and place a lesser emphasis on the technology and more on business application. As AI becomes increasingly more powerful and applications start to diverge, new research fields are introduced, and opportunities arise to combine “old” and “new” modeling technologies into hybrids. However, sustainable application is still many years away, and companies and universities alike do well to remain at the forefront. This requires investment in hardware, software, and analytical talent. It also requires a strong connection to the outside world to test, that which does, and does not work in practice and a close view of when the field of agriculture is ready to take its next big steps. Other research fields, such as engineering and automotive, have shown that the application power of AI can be far reaching but only if a realistic view of models as whole is maintained. In this review, we share our view on the current and future limitations of modeling and potential next steps for modelers in the animal sciences. First, we discuss the inherent dependencies and limitations of modeling as a human process. Then, we highlight how models, fueled by AI, can play an enhanced sustainable role in the animal sciences ecosystem. Lastly, we provide recommendations for future animal scientists on how to support themselves, the farmers, and their field, considering the opportunities and challenges the technological innovation brings.Modeling in the animal sciences has received a boost by large-scale adoption of sensor technology, increased computing power, and the further development of artificial intelligence (AI) in the form of machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) models. Together with open-source programming languages, extensive modeling libraries, and heavy marketing, modeling reached a larger audience via AI. However, like most technological innovations, AI overpromised. By adopting an almost singular model-centric view to solving business needs, models failed to integrate with existing business processes. Models, especially AI, need data and both need humans. Together, they need room to learn and fail and by offering them as the end-solution to a problem, they are unable to act as sparring partners for all relevant stakeholders. In this article, we highlight fundamental model limitations exemplified via AI, and we offer solutions toward a more sustainable adoption of AI as a catalyst for modeling. This means sharing data and code and placing a more realistic view on models. Universities and industry both play a fundamental role in offering technological prowess and business experience to the future modeler. People, not technology, are the key to a more successful adoption of models.The hype of artificial intelligence is at an end, revealing to a larger audience the inherent dependencies and limitations of modeling as a human process. Technology is good, but data and humans are essential in enabling a more sustainable role for models in the animal sciences ecosystem.