Search

The COVID-19 pandemic has been an inciting factor for a wide variety of neuropsychiatric symptoms, including first-episode psychosis (FEP).

In an era of rising geriatric mental health care needs worldwide, technological advances can help address care needs in a cost-effective fashion. Our objective in this review was to assess whether mobile health technology, such as tablets and smartphones, are feasible to use in patients with late-life mental and cognitive disorders, as well as whether they were generally reliable modes of mental health/cognitive assessment.

Background: Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs) have become the mainstay of treatment for depression, anxiety, and many other conditions. However, they have been associated with an increased risk of hyponatremia. Little is known about the risk of SSRI-associated hyponatremia in certain potentially at-risk populations, such as patients with acute medical illnesses. Objective: The main objective of this study was to examine the effect of SSRIs on serum sodium levels in medically-ill inpatients. Method: We performed a retrospective cohort study of 239 medically-ill inpatients assessed by the psychiatric consultation-liaison team of a large Canadian academic hospital between 2008 and 2014. We grouped patients based on whether they were exposed to an SSRI, a non-SSRI antidepressant, or no antidepressant at all. Our primary outcome was the maximum decrease in serum sodium level observed within 30 days of antidepressant exposure in the inpatient setting. Our secondary outcome was the incidence of hyponatremia (serum sodium level <135 mEq/L) or severe hyponatremia (sodium level <130 mEq/L) within the same time frame. Results: The maximum decrease in sodium serum level from baseline did not differ between the 3 groups studied (SSRIs - 3.31 mEq/L vs non-SSRI antidepressants -3.41 mEq/L vs no antidepressants -3.13 mEq/L, F (2) = 0.79, p= 0.92). The incidence of hyponatremia and severe hyponatremia did not differ between groups either. This remained the case after controlling for covariates. Conclusion: SSRIs do not appear to be associated with an increased risk of hyponatremia in medically-ill inpatients. Clinicians should not avoid prescribing SSRIs in this population based solely on the assumption of hyponatremia risk.

Agitation is a common reason for psychiatric consultation in the general hospital. The consultation-liaison (CL) psychiatrist is often tasked with teaching the medical team how to manage agitation.

Reports have suggested that citalopram and escitalopram may prolong the QTc interval, leading Health Canada to issue a warning to limit their dosages in 2012. Little is known about the effects of this warning and similar ones (e.g., by the Food and Drug Administration) on antidepressant prescribing in inpatients with acute medical illness, who are theoretically at high risk of QTc prolongation. The main objective of our study is to examine the effect of the Health Canada warning on citalopram/escitalopram prescribing patterns in the consultation-liaison (C-L) psychiatry setting.

Objectives: Recent investigations have shown that serotonergic antidepressant (SAd) use may increase the risk of peri-operative bleeding events. Our objective was to evaluate the possibility of a similar association in patients undergoing radiologic breast biopsies.Methods: We used data from 3890 patients undergoing 6300 biopsy procedures between January 2011 and October 2014 in the Breast Clinic of McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada. In this case-control study, cases were patients reported to have abnormal bleeding during their biopsy by board-certified radiologists. A control group of nonbleeders was selected using matching according to age and type of biopsy. The correlation between abnormal bleeding and SAd use was assessed using bivariate and multivariate statistical analyses.Results: There were 97 patients with abnormal bleeding and 137 matched controls; 10 bleeders (cases) were on SAds (7 citalopram, 3 paroxetine) while only 1 nonbleeder (control group) was on a SAd (low-dose sertraline, 25 mg/day). SAds were significantly associated with increased bleeding risk (10.3% versus0.7%, Fisher’s Exact p =0.001). Moreover, after adjusting for confounding factors (age, type of biopsy, size of biopsy, needle caliber, pathology result and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use, multivariate logistic regression confirmed that SAds were associated with elevated bleeding risk (16.2, 95% confidence interval 1.87–140.1, p =0.01).Conclusions: This is the first study demonstrating increased bleeding events in breast biopsy patients using SAds. Clinicians should be aware that SAds may be associated with peri-operative bleeding risk, even in relatively minor procedures such as breast biopsies.

Introduction:Serotonergic antidepressants (SAds) are known to increase bleeding events, with a number of recent studies investigating this risk in surgical settings. Our main objective was to synthesize the current evidence to evaluate the clinical importance of SAd-related bleeding risk in the perioperative period.Methods:A systematic review of MEDLINE, Embase and PsychINFO until November 2013 was conducted in compliance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. We examined the risk of perioperative bleeding adverse events in SAd users in comparison to controls.Results:A total of 13 relevant studies were identified across a broad variety of surgical procedures. SAds were associated with an increased risk of perioperative bleeding (odds ratios [ORs] = 1.21 – 4.14) and blood transfusions (ORs = 0.93 – 3.71).Conclusions:SAds are associated with increased perioperative bleeding events, particularly abnormal bleeding and blood transfusions. From a clinical perspective, the potential bleeding risks of SAds in surgical settings need to be carefully weighed against their psychiatric benefits. Future research will need to investigate potential strategies to mitigate SAd-related bleeding risk in the surgical context.

The relationship between mental health and human rights is complex and bidirectional. Therefore, global mental health movements should emphasize the promotion of human rights in mental health care in accordance with the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and the WHO QualityRights Initiative. The main objective of this article is to have an overview on the current global situation of human rights in mental health services.