1. Application of Artificial Intelligence in Infant Movement Classification: A Reliability and Validity Study in Infants Who Were Full-Term and Preterm
- Author
-
Lin, Shiang-Chin, Chandra, Erick, Tsao, Po Nien, Liao, Wei-Chih, Chen, Wei-J., Yen, Ting-An, Hsu, Jane Yung-Jen, and Jeng, Suh-Fang
- Subjects
Artificial intelligence -- Usage -- Health aspects ,Developmental delay -- Risk factors -- Diagnosis -- Care and treatment ,Machine learning -- Methods ,Infants (Premature) -- Care and treatment ,Artificial intelligence ,Health - Abstract
Objective. Preterm infants are at high risk of neuromotor disorders. Recent advances in digital technology and machine learning algorithms have enabled the tracking and recognition of anatomical key points of the human body. It remains unclear whether the proposed pose estimation model and the skeleton-based action recognition model for adult movement classification are applicable and accurate for infant motor assessment. Therefore, this study aimed to develop and validate an artificial intelligence (AI) model framework for movement recognition in full-term and preterm infants. Methods. This observational study prospectively assessed 30 full-term infants and 54 preterm infants using the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (58 movements) from 4 to 18 months of age with their movements recorded by 5 video cameras simultaneously in a standardized clinical setup. The movement videos were annotated for the start/end times and presence of movements by 3 pediatric physical therapists. The annotated videos were used for the development and testing of an AI algorithm that consisted of a 17-point human pose estimation model and a skeleton-based action recognition model. Results. The infants contributed 153 sessions of Alberta Infant Motor Scale assessment that yielded 13,139 videos of movements for data processing. The intra and interrater reliabilities for movement annotation of videos by the therapists showed high agreements (88%-100%). Thirty-one of the 58 movements were selected for machine learning because of sufficient data samples and developmental significance. Using the annotated results as the standards, the AI algorithm showed satisfactory agreement in classifying the 31 movements (accuracy = 0.91, recall = 0.91, precision = 0.91, and F1 score = 0.91). Conclusion. The AI algorithm was accurate in classifying 31 movements in full-term and preterm infants from 4 to 18 months of age in a standardized clinical setup. Impact. The findings provide the basis for future refinement and validation of the algorithm on home videos to be a remote infant movement assessment. Keywords: Artificial Intelligence, Assessment, Machine Learning, Motor Development, Introduction Early identification and intervention of infants who are at risk for or have developmental disorders is an important global health policy and action. The Global Research on Developmental Disabilities [...]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF