Search

Transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) plays crucial roles in the development of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, but key molecular pathways remain unknown. Here, we identified the regulation of mammalian target of rapamycin complex1 (mTORC1) by TGF-β via ERK1/2 in the Adriamycin-induced murine model of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. Adriamycin administration elicited early activation of TGF-β-ERK1/2-mTORC1 in podocytes, which persisted at later stages of albuminuria and glomerulosclerosis. Phosphorylation of the TGF-β receptor-I (TGF-βRI), Smad3, ERK1/2 and ribosomal protein S6 were evident in the glomeruli of adriamycin-treated mice. Targeting TGFβ-RI and mTORC1 with pharmacological inhibitors suppressed TGF-β signaling in glomeruli and significantly reduced albuminuria, glomerulosclerosis, protein levels of collagen 4α3, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, and vimentin and restored mRNA levels of podocyte markers. Low dose US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved MEK/ERK inhibitor trametinib/GSK1120212 blunted TGF-β1–induced mTORC1 activation in podocytes, ameliorated up-regulation of TGF-β, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, fibronectin and α-smooth muscle actin and prevented albuminuria and glomerulosclerosis with improved serum albumin. In cultured podocytes, this pathway was found to be associated with translation of fibrogenic collagen 4α3 and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, without influencing their transcription. Notably, rapamycin suppressed upstream p-TGF-βRI, p-Smad3 and p-ERK1/2, and trametinib down-regulated upstream p-Smad3 in ex vivoand in vivostudies, indicating that harmful paracrine signaling among glomerular cells amplified the TGF-β–ERK1/2–mTORC1 axis by forming a positive feedback loop. Thus, an accentuated TGF-β–ERK1/2–mTORC1 pathway is suggested as a central upstream mediator to develop proteinuria and glomerulosclerosis. Hence, preventing activation of this vicious loop by trametinib may offer a new therapeutic strategy for glomerular disease treatment.

Although DNA methylation profiles in breast cancer have been connected to breast cancer molecular subtype, there have been no studies of the association of DNA methylation with stem cell phenotype. This study was designed to evaluate the promoter CpG island methylation of 15 genes in relation to breast cancer subtype, and to investigate whether the patterns of CpG island methylation in each subtype are associated with their cancer stem cell phenotype represented by CD44+/CD24− and ALDH1 expression. We performed MethyLight analysis of the methylation status of 15 promoter CpG island loci involved in breast cancer progression (APC, DLEC1, GRIN2B, GSTP1, HOXA1, HOXA10, IGF2, MT1G, RARB, RASSF1A, RUNX3, SCGB3A1, SFRP1, SFRP4, and TMEFF2) and determined cancer stem cell phenotype by CD44/CD24 and ALDH1 immunohistochemistry in 36 luminal A, 33 luminal B, 30 luminal–HER2, 40 HER2 enriched, and 40 basal-like subtypes of breast cancer. The number of CpG island loci methylated differed significantly between subtypes, and was highest in the luminal–HER2 subtype and lowest in the basal-like subtype. Methylation frequencies and levels in 12 of the 15 genes differed significantly between subtypes, and the basal-like subtype had significantly lower methylation frequencies and levels in nine of the genes than the other subtypes. CD44+/CD24− and ALDH1+ putative stem cell populations were most enriched in the basal-like subtype. Methylation of promoter CpG islands was significantly lower in CD44+/CD24-cell (+) tumors than in CD44+/CD24-cell (−) tumors, even within the basal-like subtype. ALDH1 (+) tumors were also less methylated than ALDH1 (−) tumors. Our findings showed that promoter CpG island methylation was different in relation to breast cancer subtype and stem cell phenotype of tumor, suggesting that breast cancers have distinct patterns of CpG island methylation according to molecular subtypes and these are associated with different stem cell phenotypes of the tumor.

Although DNA methylation profiles in breast cancer have been connected to breast cancer molecular subtype, there have been no studies of the association of DNA methylation with stem cell phenotype. This study was designed to evaluate the promoter CpG island methylation of 15 genes in relation to breast cancer subtype, and to investigate whether the patterns of CpG island methylation in each subtype are associated with their cancer stem cell phenotype represented by CD44+/CD24− and ALDH1 expression. We performed MethyLight analysis of the methylation status of 15 promoter CpG island loci involved in breast cancer progression (APC, DLEC1, GRIN2B, GSTP1, HOXA1, HOXA10, IGF2, MT1G, RARB, RASSF1A, RUNX3, SCGB3A1, SFRP1, SFRP4, and TMEFF2) and determined cancer stem cell phenotype by CD44/CD24 and ALDH1 immunohistochemistry in 36 luminal A, 33 luminal B, 30 luminal–HER2, 40 HER2 enriched, and 40 basal-like subtypes of breast cancer. The number of CpG island loci methylated differed significantly between subtypes, and was highest in the luminal–HER2 subtype and lowest in the basal-like subtype. Methylation frequencies and levels in 12 of the 15 genes differed significantly between subtypes, and the basal-like subtype had significantly lower methylation frequencies and levels in nine of the genes than the other subtypes. CD44+/CD24− and ALDH1+ putative stem cell populations were most enriched in the basal-like subtype. Methylation of promoter CpG islands was significantly lower in CD44+/CD24-cell (+) tumors than in CD44+/CD24-cell (−) tumors, even within the basal-like subtype. ALDH1 (+) tumors were also less methylated than ALDH1 (−) tumors. Our findings showed that promoter CpG island methylation was different in relation to breast cancer subtype and stem cell phenotype of tumor, suggesting that breast cancers have distinct patterns of CpG island methylation according to molecular subtypes and these are associated with different stem cell phenotypes of the tumor.