Search

Right ventricular assist devices (RVADs) can be used in patients with acute right heart failure. A novel device that has recently been deployed is the right atrium to pulmonary artery (RA-PA) dual lumen single cannula (DLSC). One of the limitations is that it occupies a large proportion of the right ventricular outflow tract and PA; therefore, standard continuous hemodynamic monitoring with a pulmonary artery catheter is commonly not used. Serial echocardiography is pivotal for device deployment, monitoring device position, assessing RV readiness for decannulation, and surveilling for short-term complications. We performed a retrospective case series of 24 patients with RA-PA DLSC RVAD assessing echocardiographic RV progression and vasoactive infusion requirements. The overall survival was 66.6%. The average vasoactive infusion score at the time of cannulation was 24.9 ± 43.9, at decannulation in survivors 4.6 ± 4.9 vs. 25.4 ± 21.5 in nonsurvivors, and 2.7 ± 4.9 at 48 hours post decannulation. On echocardiography, the average visual estimate of RV systolic function encoded (0 = none and 5 = severe) in survivors was 3.9 ± 1.2, 2.8 ± 1.6, 2.5 ± 1.7, and 2.8 ± 1.9, respectively, and in nonsurvivors 3.8 ± 1.6 and 3.4 ± 1.8, respectively. This demonstrated an RV systolic function improvement over time in survivors as opposed to nonsurvivors. This was also demonstrated in RV size visual estimate, respectively. Quantitatively, at the predefined four timepoints, the RV:LV, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, and fractional area change all improve over time and there is statistically significant difference in survivors versusnonsurvivors. In this study, we describe a cohort of patients treated with RA-PA DLSC RVAD. We illustrate the critical nature of echocardiographic measures to rate the progression of RV function, improvement in vasoactive infusion requirements, and ventilator parameters with the RA-PA DLSC.

Treatment of acute pulmonary embolism (PE) historically included anticoagulation and systemic thrombolytic therapy. More recently, catheter guided interventions provided promise of mitigating bleeding risks usually associated with systemic thrombolysis in intermediate to high risk PE patients. Catheter based interventions can broadly be divided into catheter directed thrombolysis and catheter based embolectomy. Both modalities are currently undergoing active research and each has their respective risks and benefits. The decision to administer these advanced therapies for acute PE can be challenging but can be accomplished via a multi-disciplinary PE response team.

Background We provide the first multicenter analysis of patients cared for by eight Pulmonary Embolism Response Teams (PERTs) in the United States (US); describing the frequency of team activation, patient characteristics, pulmonary embolism (PE) severity, treatments delivered, and outcomes.Methods We enrolled patients from the National PERT Consortium™ multicenter registry with a PERT activation between 18 October 2016 and 17 October 2017. Data are presented combined and by PERT institution. Differences between institutions were analyzed using chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables, and ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis test for continuous variables, with a two-sided Pvalue < 0.05 considered statistically significant.Results There were 475 unique PERT activations across the Consortium, with acute PE confirmed in 416 (88%). The number of activations at each institution ranged from 3 to 13 activations/month/1000 beds with the majority originating from the emergency department (281/475; 59.3%). The largest percentage of patients were at intermediate–low (141/416, 34%) and intermediate–high (146/416, 35%) risk of early mortality, while fewer were at high-risk (51/416, 12%) and low-risk (78/416, 19%). The distribution of risk groups varied significantly between institutions (P= 0.002). Anticoagulation alone was the most common therapy, delivered to 289/416 (70%) patients with confirmed PE. The proportion of patients receiving any advanced therapy varied between institutions (P= 0.0003), ranging from 16% to 46%. The 30-day mortality was 16% (53/338), ranging from 9% to 44%.Conclusions The frequency of team activation, PE severity, treatments delivered, and 30-day mortality varies between US PERTs. Further research should investigate the sources of this variability.

INTRO:The AHA Mission Lifeline recommends an EMS first medical contact (FMC) to balloon time of 90 minutes for patients STEMI when presenting directly to a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) hospital but 120 minutes for those requiring transfer from a non-PCI hospital. We examine the impact of direct air medical transport from the scene to a PCI center of rural patients without access to a local PCI capable hospital versus EMS transport to and subsequent transfer from a non-PCI hospital.

The American College of Cardiology guidelines assign a Class IC recommendation for the use of a Heart Team approach in the treatment of complex coronary artery disease (CAD). However, doubts remain regarding the practical application and functionality of this method in providing routine cardiovascular care. We sought to assess the feasibility of the Heart Team approach to adjudicate complex CAD through analyzing personnel participation, as well as anatomic and comorbid patient characteristics.