Search

Objective: An open label, controlled clinical study was conducted in Indian infants aged 6-14 weeks to compare the immunogenicity and safety of a reconstituted pentavalent vaccine (DTwP-HBV+Hib) of Serum Institute of India Ltd (SIIL) with TritanrixHB+Hiberix vaccine of Glaxo Smithkline (GSK).Methods: Eligible infants were randomized to receive three doses of the study / comparator vaccine. The vaccines were reconstituted prior to administration, by mixing DTwP-HBV (liquid) with the Hib (lyophilized) vaccine. IgG antibody titres were assessed by ELISA at baseline and after one month following the 3-dose primary immunization schedule. Safety was evaluated after each dose. Further, safety and immunogenicity was also evaluated following a booster dose in the same cohort of children (aged between 15-24 months).Setting: Tertiary-care hospitals in IndiaImportant outcome measures: Immunogenicity and safety following a 3-dose primary vaccination series and a booster vaccination.Results: Post-primary immunization, 100% seroprotection was noted for Diphtheria, Tetanus, Hepatitis B and PRP-Hib components in both the vaccine groups. For pertussis, response was 96.1% in SIIL and 95.4% in GSK group. The overall safety profile as well as persistence of antibodies against all vaccine components up to the time of booster immunization was comparable between the SIIL and GSK groups. A marked rise of all antibody concentrations indicated effective priming. The booster dose was safe, well tolerated with a significant increase in antibody concentrations of all the vaccine antigens in both the groups.Conclusion: DTwP-HBV+Hib vaccine of SIIL was found to be safe and immunogenic. This Indian vaccine compared well with the licensed vaccine and is a cost-effective alternative for incorporating into the immunization schedule of various countries so as to control worldwide Hepatitis B and Hib infections.

Pre-exposure prophylaxis was given to employees supposed to be involved in rabies vaccine production in India. Prior to availability of the manufacturer’s own human diploid cell (HDC) vaccine (Rabivax®), immunization was executed with a chick embryo cell (CEC) vaccine (Rabipur®). This constellation gave an opportunity to compare retrospectively immunogenicity of these two vaccines. The data was collected by retrospective analysis over more than 3 years at the clinic of Serum Institute of India Ltd. As per the standard protocol, persons with negative rabies vaccination history receive a dose of 1 ml of rabies vaccine intramuscularly on day 0, 7 and 28, and the virus anti-glycoprotein antibodies are measured one month after the third dose. The antibody levels ≥ 0.5 IU/ml are considered protective. The CEC and HDC vaccines were used during the analysis period. In all, 43 individuals received the CEC vaccine, 106 the HDC vaccine. The mean age of recipients was 33 years 5 months (Rabipur®) and 30 years 3 months (Rabivax®). All subjects in both groups were males. Five commercial batches of the CEC vaccine (129 doses) and seven batches of the HDC vaccine (318 doses) were used. 99% of the HDC and 93% of the CEC vaccine recipients were protected after the standard 3 dose schedule. Geometric mean titre was significantly greater for the HDC than CEC vaccine, being 5.05 IU/ml and 2.90 IU/ml, respectively (P=0.0002). The HDC vaccine showed a good lot-to-lot consistency with respect to GMT both by ANOVA test and Nonparametric ANOVA test. On the other hand, the CEC vaccine demonstrated a variation in titres, when the lots were compared. Three out of four low-responders accepted a booster vaccination, and regardless of whether Rabipur® or Rabivax® was used, all three responded well 1 month after the booster. The Indian HDC vaccine compares well with the CEC vaccine in terms of immunogenicity. With HDC vaccines, cost has been an issue. However, since the new HDC vaccine has a comparable cost to the CEC vaccine, it may be possible to use it in large-scale vaccinations.