Search

The natural history of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection after renal transplantation (RT) remains unclear. We conducted a systematic review of the published medical literature on the impact of HBV surface antigen (HBsAg) seropositivity on survival of RT recipients. We used the random effects model of DerSimonian and Laird to generate a summary estimate of the relative risk for mortality and graft loss in HBsAg positive RT recipients across the published studies. We identified six observational studies (6050 unique patients); all of them being cohort, retrospective studies. Pooling of study results demonstrated that HBsAg in serum was an independent and significant risk factor for death after RT; the summary estimate for relative risk was 2.49 with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI) of 1.64–3.78. A test for homogeneity of the relative risk across the studies gave a p‐value of <0.0001. HBsAg seropositivity was an independent and significant risk factor for graft failure after RT; the summary estimate was 1.44 with a 95% CI of 1.02–2.04 (homogeneity test, p <0.0001). This meta‐analysis shows that HBsAg positive RT recipients have an increased risk for mortality and graft failure compared to seronegative patients.

Background: Endoscopic diagnosis and treatment of hematochezia caused by rectal ulcers is poorly described. Methods: Consecutive patients hospitalized with severe hematochezia underwent urgent colonoscopy after purge. Those with rectal ulcers were divided into 2 groups based on the absence or presence of major stigmata of recent hemorrhage: active bleeding, visible vessel, or adherent clot. Major stigmata were treated with epinephrine injection and coagulation with a bipolar probe. The primary outcome endpoint was recurrent bleeding within 4 weeks of diagnosis Results: Rectal ulcers were identified in 23 of 285 (8%) patients. Twelve of 23 patients had major stigmata; these patients had an arithmetically greater decrease in hematocrit and required more blood transfusions than patients without major stigmata. Initial hemostasis was achieved in all, but bleeding recurred in 5 with stigmata. Four patients died of comorbid conditions. There was no recurrent bleeding or death in those without stigmata. Conclusions: Patients with rectal ulcers harboring major stigmata are at high risk for severe bleeding, recurrent bleeding, and death. For ulcers with major stigmata, endoscopic hemostasis is feasible but rates of recurrent bleeding are high