Search

DNA-damage repair (DDR) pathway mutations can sensitize cancer cells to a class of cancer therapeutics known as PARP inhibitors. Given that DDR alterations can be found in up to one-third of advanced prostate cancers, PARP inhibitors have recently been established in treatment-refractory settings. We provide an updated review of the clinical data supporting the 4 PARP inhibitors that have undergone the most investigation thus far in metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Two of these agents are currently approved for the treatment of DDR-altered mCRPC. We end with a discussion on integration of approved PARP inhibitors into advanced prostate cancer clinical practice. KEYWORDS: Prostate cancer, androgen inhibition, poly(ADP) ribose polymerase, PARP inhibitors, DNA damage repair, BRCA, homologous recombination, Introduction Prostate cancer represents the most commonly diagnosed cancer and second-leading cause of cancer death in US men, with a projected 191,930 new cases and 33,330 deaths in 2020. (1) [...]

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Objective:Previous studies have demonstrated the ability of non-lethal doses of radiation to alter the phenotype of tumor cells to facilitate immune mediated killing. This pilot study evaluated the tolerability of a vector-based vaccine targeting carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in combination with radiation therapy in patients with gastrointestinal malignancies metastatic to the liver.Methods:Patients enrolled had progressive CEA+tumors with metastatic liver lesions. Patients had received a median of three previous chemotherapy regimens, with a median of 2 months since their last chemotherapy regimen. Only 58% had metastatic disease limited to the liver. Vaccination commenced day 1 with biweekly boosters and split-course radiation (total 32 Gy) starting on day 21. Blood was collected at baseline and day 91 for immunological analysis.Results/conclusion:A total of 12 patients were enrolled. There were no grade 3 or greater toxicities or grade 2 or greater hepatic toxicities. Median time on-study was 3 months, with the longest time on treatment being 5 months (n = 2). Immunological analysis was limited to two patients; neither showed an increase above baseline in CEA-specific T cells post-therapy. CEA/TRICOM vaccination in combination with low-dose radiation therapy is safe. There was limited evidence of activity in this patient population.

IMPORTANCE: Packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusions are used to treat anemia in patients with cervical cancer undergoing radiotherapy (RT) owing to concerns of hypoxia-induced radioresistance. In the absence of high-quality evidence informing transfusion practices for patients receiving external beam RT (EBRT) and brachytherapy, various arbitrary hemoglobin target levels are used worldwide. OBJECTIVE: To develop consensus statements to guide PRBC transfusion practices in patients with cervical cancer receiving curative-intent RT with EBRT and brachytherapy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This international Delphi consensus study was completed between November 1, 2019, and July 31, 2020. A total of 63 international clinical experts in gynecologic radiation oncology were invited; 39 (62%) accepted and consented to participate. Consensus building was achieved using a 3-round anonymous Delphi consensus method. Participants rated their agreement or disagreement with statements using a 5-point Likert scale. An a priori threshold of 75% or more was required for consensus. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The preplanned primary outcome of this study was to assess hemoglobin transfusion thresholds and targets for both EBRT and brachytherapy by expert consensus. RESULTS: Response rates of 100% (39 of 39), 92% (36 of 39), and 97% (35 of 36) were achieved for the first, second, and third rounds of surveys, respectively. Twenty-three experts (59%) practiced in Canada, 11 (28%) in the United States, 3 (8%) in South America, 1 (3%) in Europe, and 1 (3%) in Asia. Consensus was reached for 44 of 103 statements (43%), which were combined to form the final 27-statement consensus guideline. No specific hemoglobin transfusion threshold was agreed on by consensus for EBRT or brachytherapy. By consensus (89% [31 of 35]), a hemoglobin transfusion target for patients who receive a PRBC transfusion should be 9 g/dL or more and less than 12 g/dL. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This study presents the first international expert consensus guideline informing PRBC transfusion practices for patients with cervical cancer undergoing EBRT and brachytherapy. A minimum hemoglobin transfusion target of 9 g/dL was endorsed to balance tumor radiosensitivity with appropriate use of a scarce resource. Randomized clinical trials are required to evaluate the optimal transfusion threshold and target that maximize clinical benefit in this patient population.