Search

Study Design Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Objectives This study aimed to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of surgically treated adjacent segment disease (ASDis) following ACDF with either anterior plate construct (APC) or stand-alone anchored spacers (SAAS).Method Multiple databases were searched until December 2022 for pertinent studies. The primary outcome was health-related quality of life outcomes [JOA, NDI, and VAS], whereas, the secondary outcomes included operative characteristics [estimated blood loss (EBL) and operative time (OT)], radiological outcomes [C2-C7 Cobb angle, disc height index (DHI) changes, fusion rate], and complications.Results A total of 5 studies were included, comprising 210 patients who had been surgically treated for cervical ASDis. Among them, 113 received APC, and 97 received SAAS. Postoperative dysphagia was significantly higher in the APC group [47% vs 11%, OR = 7.7, 95% CI = 3.1-18.9, P< .05]. Similarly, operative time and blood loss were higher in the APC group compared to the SAAS group; [MD = 16.96, 95% CI = 7.87-26.06, P< .05] and [MD = 5.22, 95% CI = .35 - 10.09, P< .05], respectively. However, there was no difference in the rate of prolonged dysphagia and clinical outcomes in terms of JOA, NDI, and VAS. Furthermore, there was no difference in the radiological parameters including the C2-7 Cobb angle and DHI as well as the fusion rate.Conclusion Our meta-analysis demonstrated that both surgical techniques (APC and SAAS) are effective in treating ASDis. However, with low certainty of the evidence, considering patients are at high risk of dysphagia following revision cervical spine surgery SAAS may be the preferred choice.

Study design An ambispective, observational study of the prospective, institutional adult spine deformity (ASD) database.Objectives The study investigates the clinical and radiographic fusion rates with lateral interbody approach and rhBMP-2 in multiple-level lumbar fusion in the ASD population. Previous studies have reported over 10% pseudoarthrosis rate with multiple segment fusions. Lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) allows multiple-level, less-invasive access to the anterior lumbar spine. We hypothesized that fusion rates with lateral approach with rhBMP-2 use are superior to the published data on lumbar fusion in ASD patients.Methods The institutional ASD database was searched to identify eligible patients with two or more levels of LLIF (T12-L5), >4 levels of posterior instrumentations and >2 years of follow-up between the years 2010 and 2018. Antero-posterior and lateral 36-inch standing radiographs for each patient and computed tomography scans in select patients were studied to ascertain fusion status and patients were divided into two groups based on fusion status.Results The study included 179 patients with a mean age of 65.3 years and 74% female patients. The median number of interbody fusions was performed at 3 (IQR 3-4) levels. The mean follow-up duration was 4.4 years (SD = 1.9). 169 patients (94.5%) had successful arthrodesis, while 10 patients (5.5%) had radiological pseudoarthrosis at one level. Of the 10 patients, 8 (4.4%) were either clinically asymptomatic or had manageable back pain. Two patients (1.1%) required revision surgery for symptomatic pseudoarthrosis.Conclusion This is the largest known series of ASD patients investigating the fusion rates with multiple-level LLIFs. LLIF along with rhBMP-2 can achieve high fusion success across interbody fusion levels in multi-segmental ASD surgeries.

Study Design: Retrospective cohort study.Objective: We evaluated the effectiveness of minimally invasive (MIS) tubular discectomy in comparison to conventional open surgery among patients enrolled in the Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network (CSORN).Methods: We performed an observational analysis of data that was prospectively collected. We implemented Minimum Clinically Important Differences (MCIDs), and we adjusted for potential confounders with multiple logistic regression. Adverse events were collected according to the Spinal Adverse Events Severity (SAVES) protocol.Results: Three hundred thirty-nine (62%) patients underwent MIS tubular discectomy and 211 (38%) underwent conventional open discectomy. There were no significant differences between groups for improvement of leg pain and disability, but the MIS technique was associated with reduced odds of achieving the MCID for back pain (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.99, P< 0.05). We identified statistically significant differences in favor of MIS for each of operating time (MIS mean (SD) 72.2 minutes (30.0) vs open 93.5 (40.9)), estimated blood loss (MIS 37.9 mL (36.7) vs open 76.8 (71.4)), length of stay in hospital (MIS 73% same-day discharge vs open 40%), rates of incidental durotomy (MIS 4% vs open 8%), and wound-related complications (MIS 3% vs open 9%); but not for overall rates of reoperation.Conclusions: Open and MIS techniques yielded similar improvements of leg pain and disability at up to 12 months of follow-up, but MIS patients were less likely to experience improvement of associated back pain. Small differences favored MIS for operating time, blood loss, and adverse events but may have limited clinical importance.

Study Design: Uncontrolled retrospective observational study.Objectives: Surgery for patients with back pain and degenerative disc disease is controversial, and studies to date have yielded conflicting results. We evaluated the effects of lumbar fusion surgery for patients with this indication in the Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network (CSORN).Methods: We analyzed data that were prospectively collected from consecutive patients at 11 centers between 2015 and 2019. Our primary outcome was change in patient-reported back pain at 12 months of follow-up, and our secondary outcomes were satisfaction, disability, health-related quality of life, and rates of adverse events.Results: Among 84 patients, we observed a statistically significant improvement of back pain at 12 months that exceeded the threshold of Minimum Clinically Important Difference (MCID) (mean change -3.7 points, SD 2.6, p < 0.001, MCID = 1.2; 77% achieved MCID), and 81% reported being “somewhat” or “extremely” satisfied. We also observed improvements of Oswestry Disability Index (-17.3, SD 16.6), Short Form-12 Physical Component Summary (10.3, SD 9.6) and Short Form-12 Mental Component Summary (3.1, SD 8.3); all p < 0.001). The overall rate of adverse events was 19%.Conclusions: Among a highly selective group of patients undergoing lumbar fusion surgery for degenerative disc disease, most experienced a clinically significant improvement of back pain as well as significant improvements of disability and health-related quality of life, with high satisfaction at 1 year of follow-up. These findings suggest that surgery for this indication may provide some benefit, and that further research is warranted.

Study design: Retrosepctive analysis of prospectively collected data from the multicentre Canadian Surgical Spine Registry (CSORN).Objective: Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is the most common cause of spinal cord dysfunction in North America. Few studies have evaluated return to work (RTW) rates after DCM surgery. Our goals were to determine rates and factors associated with postoperative RTW in surgically managed patients with DCM.Methods: Data was derived from the prospective, multicenter Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network (CSORN). From this cohort, we included all nonretired patients with at least 1-year follow-up. The RTW rate was defined as the proportion of patients with active employment at 1 year from the time of surgery. Unadjusted and adjusted analyses were used to identify patient characteristics, disease, and treatment variables associated with RTW.Results: Of 213 surgically treated DCM patients, 126 met eligibility, with 49% working and 51% not working in the immediate period before surgery; 102 had 12-month follow-up data. In both the unadjusted and the adjusted analyses working preoperatively and an anterior approach were associated with a higher postoperative RTW (P< .05), there were no significant differences between the postoperative employment groups with respect to age, gender, preoperative mJOA (modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association) score, and duration of symptoms (P> .05). Active preoperative employment (odds ratio = 15.4, 95% confidence interval = 4.5, 52.4) and anterior surgical procedures (odds ratio = 4.7, 95% confidence interval = 1.2, 19.6) were associated with greater odds of RTW at 1 year.Conclusions: The majority of nonretired patients undergoing surgery for DCM had returned to work 12 months after surgery; active preoperative employment and anterior surgical approach were associated with RTW in this analysis.

Graphical Abstract

Conflicting evidence exists regarding the effectiveness of surgery for degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM), particularly in mild DCM.

ABSTRACT:Background:Cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) is the leading cause of spinal cord impairment. In a public healthcare system, wait times to see spine specialists and eventually access surgical treatment for CSM can be substantial. The goals of this study were to determine consultation wait times (CWT) and surgical wait times (SWT), and identify predictors of wait time length. Methods:Consecutive patients enrolled in the Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network (CSORN) prospective and observational CSM study from March 2015 to July 2017 were included. A data-splitting technique was used to develop and internally validate multivariable models of potential predictors. Results:A CSORN query returned 264 CSM patients for CWT. The median was 46 days. There were 31% mild, 35% moderate, and 33% severe CSM. There was a statistically significant difference in median CWT between moderate and severe groups; 207 patients underwent surgical treatment. Median SWT was 42 days. There was a statistically significant difference in SWT between mild/moderate and severe groups. Short symptom duration, less pain, lower BMI, and lower physical component score of SF-12 were predictive of shorter CWT. Only baseline pain and medication duration were predictive of SWT. Both CWT and SWT were shorter compared to a concurrent cohort of lumbar stenosis patients (p<0.001). Conclusions:Patients with shorter duration (either symptoms or medication) and less neck pain waited less to see a spine specialist in Canada and to undergo surgical treatment. This study highlights some of the obstacles to overcome in expedited care for this patient population.

A 65-year-old male with a history of hypertension presents to the emergency department (ED) with new onset of non-traumatic back pain. The patient is investigated for life-threatening diagnoses and screened for “red flag symptoms,” including fever, neurologic abnormalities, bowel/bladder symptoms, and a history of injectiondrug use (IVDU). The patient is treated symptomatically and discharged home but represents to the ED three additional times, each time with new and progressive symptoms. At the time of admission, he is unable to ambulate, has perineal anesthesia, and 500 cc of urinary retention. Whole spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) confirms a thoracic spinal epidural abscess. This case, and many like it, prompts the questions: when should emergency physicians consider the diagnosis of a spinal epidural abscess, and what is the appropriate evaluation of these patients in the ED? (Figure 1).

A 43-year-old male, with a history of chronic back pain, presents to the emergency department (ED) with acute onset chronic pain. He states he “tweaked something” and has been debilitated by back pain, radiating down both his legs, for 24 hours. He has not had a bowel movement but denies noticing any “saddle anesthesia.” His clinical exam is limited by pain, and it is difficult to determine if he has objective weakness. His perineal sensation is intact, as is his sensation upon digital rectal examination. The patient has a post-void residual of 250 mL, but you are unsure how to interpret this value. As an emergency physician, when should you suspect, and how should you evaluate cauda equina syndrome?

Spondylodiscitis is commonly caused by Staphylococcus aureus. Anaerobic organisms are the causative agents in only 3–4% of cases. Diagnosis of anaerobic spondylodiscitis can be challenging due to their low virulence nature.

Fragmentation in a quadrupole ion trap of each of two isomeric molecular ions, obtained from 4-nitro-o-xylene and 4-nitro-m-xylene, has been investigated. It is demonstrated that the degree of fragmentation may be controlled by prolongation of both the duration for which the working point of the mass-selected species is held in the vicinity of a stability boundary and a prior collisional cooling period. The extent of fragmentation has been found to increase as the working point is held near the βz = 0 stability boundary while the relative abundances of fragment ions can be varied with the duration of the collisional cooling period. Under appropriate conditions for 4-nitro-o-xylene, >94% of the isolated ions can be fragmented; <5% of the ions are lost from the ion trap while 1% remain intact. As 99% of the charge of the fragmented ions is retained in the ion trap, the overall optimum efficiency of boundary-activated dissociation is >93%; the corresponding efficiency for 4-nitro-m-xylene is 74%. 50% of the selected ions can be fragmented in ≤3 ms. The results are compared with collision-activated dissociation studies carried out with a triple stage quadrupole–hexapole–quadrupole instrument. This technique of boundary-activated dissociation provides a general procedure which does not require careful tuning of the instrument as is required for the more commonly-used technique of resonance excitation.