Search

The maintenance of physical distance, the absence of relatives and the relocation of registered nurses to COVID-19 units presumably affects nursing care at non-COVID-19 units. Using a qualitative design, this study explored registered nurses’ experiences of how COVID-19 influenced nursing care in non-COVID-19 units at a Danish university hospital during the first wave of the virus. The study is reported using the COREQ checklist. The analysis offered two findings: (1) the challenge of an increased workload for registered nurses remaining in non-COVID-19 units and (2) the difficulty of navigating the contradictory needs for both closeness to and distance from patients. The study concluded that several factors challenged nursing care in non-COVID-19 units during the COVID-19 pandemic. These may have decreased the amount of contact between patients and registered nurses, which may have contributed to a task-oriented approach to nursing care, leading to missed nursing care.

A divergence exists between registered nurses’ (RNs’) intention to document together with the patient and their actual documentation practice; a practice that also diverges from official intentions of patient participation. This study aimed to explore and describe RNs’ reflected experiences on patient participation in nursing documentation. A descriptive qualitative study was conducted based on three focus groups with 14 registered nurses from an acute medical ward. Content analysis and conversational analysis were performed. The reporting adhered to the COREQ checklist. The findings showed that nurses made little mention of patient participation in nursing documentation due to challenges in meeting both the patients’ expected needs and nurses’ needs. However, patient participation was important for time accurate and summative nursing documentation. This study adds to a critical debate on patient participation and contributes to a practice-based understanding of the challenges that registered nurses experience concerning patient participation in nursing documentation.

Despite the risk of delayed motor development in infants born preterm, knowledge about interventions in the neonatal intensive care unitt (NICU) and the effects of dosing is sparse.

Study design: Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) data from two parallel independent single-blinded controlled randomized studies of manual (Study 1) and robotic (Study 2) locomotor training were combined (ClinicalTrials.gov#NCT00854555). Objective: To assess effects of body-weight supported locomotor training (BWSLT) programs on HRQOL in persons with long-standing motor incomplete spinal cord injury and poor walking function. Settings: Two inpatient rehabilitation facilities and one outpatient clinic in Norway. Methods: Data were merged into intervention (locomotor training 60 days) or control group (“usual care”). Participants completed questionnaires before randomization and 2–4 weeks after the study period, including demographic characteristics, HRQOL (36-Item Short-Form Health Status Survey, SF-36), physical activity (The International Physical Activity Questionnaire Short Form, IPAQ-SF), exercise barrier self-efficacy (EBSE), and motivation for training (Behavioral Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire, BREQ). Physical outcomes i.e., Lower extremity motor score (LEMS) was assessed. The main outcome was change in HRQOL. Secondary outcomes included changes in IPAQ-SF, EBSE, BREQ, and physical outcomes. Results: We recruited 37 of 60 predetermined participants. They were autonomously motivated with high baseline physical activity. BWSLT with manual or robot assistance did not improve HRQOL, though LEMS increased in the BWSLT group compared with control group. Conclusions: The study was underpowered due to recruitment problems. The training programs seem to benefit LEMS, but not other physical outcomes, and had minimal effects on HRQOL, EBSE, and motivation. Autonomous motivation and high physical activity prior to the study possibly limited the attainable outcome benefits, in addition to limitations due to poor baseline physical function.

COVID-19 restrictions prevented relatives from visiting and accompanying patients to hospital and required that nurses wore personal protective equipment. These changes affected patients’ relationships with relatives and challenged their ability to connect with nurses. Individual, semi-structured interviews with 15 patients were carried out to explore patients’ experiences of their relationships with relatives and their collaboration with nurses during in- and outpatient contacts in non-COVID-19 hospital wards. The analysis of data was guided by phenomenological hermeneutic frame of reference and the study was reported according to the COREQ checklist. The findings illustrated that patients felt lonely and insecure when separated from relatives, caught between relatives and professionals during information exchange, and experienced the absence of relatives as both beneficial and burdening. Visitor restrictions provided patients with time to heal but prevented provision of informal care. Patients had to take responsibility for maintaining contact with relatives independent of their health condition. COVID-19 restrictions created distance with nurses, which potentially led to insufficient physical and psychosocial care.

Patients with cancer are expected to call an oncological emergency unit when they are unable to manage symptoms of their disease and side effects from treatment at home. Responding to calls from patients with different problems in a team of registered nurses and medical doctors requires interprofessional collaboration and learning. Therefore, this study aimed to explore conditions for team-based collaboration and learning when responding to calls from patients diagnosed with cancer in a specific setting of an oncological emergency unit. Using a frame of qualitative description three focus groups with 16 healthcare professionals from an oncological emergency unit at a Danish University Hospital were conducted. The verbatim transcribed text was analyzed using content analysis, and reported according to the COREQ guidelines. Two main themes emerged: 1) ‘Availability – a precondition for learning and collaboration’ and 2) ‘Sense of responsibility and distribution of roles’. The study demonstrated that interprofessional collaboration and learning were affected by intra and interprofessional and contextual factors. In addition to an awareness of personal attitudes, the environment and the distribution of responsibility and roles as essential preconditions for accomplishing teamwork need to be explicitly articulated if the team-based learning and collaboration are to succeed.

Relatives are an important resource to hospitalised patients and hence to nursing. During the COVID-19 pandemic, visiting restriction policies were implemented in healthcare settings globally, unwillingly excluding relatives from visiting the bedsides of their loved ones. The aim of the present study was to explore how the visiting restrictions influenced relatives’ relationships with patients and collaboration with registered nurses at non-pandemic hospital wards. In total, 13 relatives were interviewed. The study was reported following the COREQ guidelines and checklist. Content analysis led to three themes: 1) being excluded from providing care and support; 2) being excluded from conveying person-centred and situational relevant knowledge to registered nurses; and 3) being excluded from assessing the health status of the hospitalised loved one. Together they describe relatives feeling worried and powerless regarding the health of their hospitalised loved one and the performed nursing care. Findings from studies such as this are pivotal to any future national or global health crisis, where visiting restriction policies are implemented.

Grip strength has consistently been found to predict all-cause mortality rates. However, few studies have examined cause-specific mortality or tested age differences in these associations.

Quality-of-life tests are used because they provide information about symptoms, potential complications, and response to treatment with patients as active participants. We took Crohn’s disease (CD) during diet supplement with omega 3 or 6 fatty acids (ω-3FA vs. ω-6FA) Impact®as an example and assessed three quality-of-life tests: The inflammatory bowel disease questionnaire (IBDQ), the Beck depression inventory (BDI), and the visual analogue scale (VAS). These tests have been found inconvenient, not informative in daily clinical use, and inhomogeneous in international studies.Quality-of-life tests are used because they provide information about symptoms, potential complications, and response to treatment with patients as active participants. We took Crohn’s disease (CD) during diet supplement with omega 3 or 6 fatty acids (ω-3FA vs. ω-6FA) Impact®as an example and assessed three quality-of-life tests: The inflammatory bowel disease questionnaire (IBDQ), the Beck depression inventory (BDI), and the visual analogue scale (VAS). These tests have been found inconvenient, not informative in daily clinical use, and inhomogeneous in international studies.

In inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), proxy measures of clinical outcome are often collected into summary indices of qualitative self-rated disease markers, clinical observations, and quantitative biochemical analyses. In Crohn's disease (CD), a frequently used index is the Crohn's disease activity index (DCAI). This index consists of six qualitative variables and two quantitative variables. The aim of this presentation is to illustrate the use of this index to calculate its range, to estimate errors in the index, its sensitivity, and the number of significant steps in the index. The measure of sensitivity of the summary index was analyzed for the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), the reference change value (RCV) and the confidence interval (CI). If identical errors were assumed in patient self-rated health and clinically judged disease manifestations, such as tumours and fistulas, the majority of the variance of the index was caused by the self-rated experience of health, the number of days over which the individual variable was rated, and the prognostic multiplier of each variable.In inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), proxy measures of clinical outcome are often collected into summary indices of qualitative self-rated disease markers, clinical observations, and quantitative biochemical analyses. In Crohn's disease (CD), a frequently used index is the Crohn's disease activity index (DCAI). This index consists of six qualitative variables and two quantitative variables. The aim of this presentation is to illustrate the use of this index to calculate its range, to estimate errors in the index, its sensitivity, and the number of significant steps in the index. The measure of sensitivity of the summary index was analyzed for the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), the reference change value (RCV) and the confidence interval (CI). If identical errors were assumed in patient self-rated health and clinically judged disease manifestations, such as tumours and fistulas, the majority of the variance of the index was caused by the self-rated experience of health, the number of days over which the individual variable was rated, and the prognostic multiplier of each variable.

Jørgensen L, Engstad T, Jacobsen BK. Self-reported urinary incontinence in noninstitutionalized long-term stroke survivors: a population-based study.