Search

Risk-standardized measures of hospital outcomes reported by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services include Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) patients and exclude Medicare Advantage (MA) patients due to data availability. MA penetration varies greatly nationwide and seems to be associated with increased FFS population risk. Whether variation in MA penetration affects the performance on the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Service measures is unknown.

National attention has increasingly focused on readmission as a target for quality improvement. We present the development and validation of a model approved by the National Quality Forum and used by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services for hospital-level public reporting of risk-standardized readmission rates for patients discharged from the hospital after an acute myocardial infarction.

Patient outcomes provide a critical perspective on quality of care. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) is publicly reporting hospital 30-day risk-standardized mortality rates (RSMRs) and risk-standardized readmission rates (RSRRs) for patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and heart failure (HF). We provide a national perspective on hospital performance for the 2010 release of these measures.

Objective:One approach to reduce health care spending and improve coordination of care is to pay for an episode of care rather than individual services. Anchoring these episodes around an index hospitalization is sensible because hospitalizations are a leading contributor to rising healthcare costs and an index admission provides a clear time to begin the episode. Understanding which care settings are responsible for a greater proportion of expenditures can inform efforts to improve efficiencies in the care provided. Our objectives were to: 1) characterize total episode payments for two conditions and 2) examine the care settings accounting for the highest proportions of the 30-day episode of care payment.