Search

Background: Histopathology is the reference standard for diagnosing liver metastases of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Somatostatin receptor-positron emission tomography / computed tomography (SSR-PET/CT) has emerged as a promising non-invasive imaging modality for staging NETs. We aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of SSR-PET/CT in the identification of liver metastases in patients with proven NETs compared to histopathology. Methods: Histopathologic reports of 139 resected or biopsied liver lesions of patients with known NET were correlated with matching SSR-PET/CTs and the positive/negative predictive value (PPV/NPV), sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of SSR-PET/CT were evaluated. PET/CT reading was performed by one expert reader blinded to histopathology and clinical data. Results: 133 of 139 (95.7%) liver lesions showed malignant SSR-uptake in PET/CT while initial histopathology reported on ‘liver metastases of NET´ in 127 (91.4%) cases, giving a PPV of 91.0%. Re-biopsy of the initially histopathologically negative lesions (reference standard) nevertheless diagnosed ‘liver metastases of NET’ in 6 cases, improving the PPV of PET/CT to 95.5%. Reasons for initial false-negative histopathology were inadequate sampling in the sense of non-target biopsies. The 6 (4.3%) SSR-negative lesions were all G2 NETs with a Ki-67 between 2–15%. Conclusion: SSR-PET/CT is a highly accurate imaging modality for the diagnosis of liver metastases in patients with proven NETs. However, we found that due to the well-known tumor heterogeneity of NETs, specifically in G2 NETs approximately 4–5% are SSR-negative and may require additional imaging with [18F]FDG PET/CT.

Background: The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of somatostatin receptor (SSR)-PET/CT to liver MRI as reference standard in the evaluation of hepatic involvement in neuroendocrine tumors (NET). Methods: An institutional database was screened for “SSR” imaging studies between 2006 and 2021. 1000 NET Patients (grade 1/2) with 2383 SSR-PET/CT studies and matching liver MRI in an interval of +3 months were identified. Medical reports of SSR-PET/CT and MRI were retrospectively evaluated regarding hepatic involvement and either confirmed by both or observed in MRI but not in SSR-PET/CT (false-negative) or in SSR-PET but not in MRI (false-positive). Results: Metastatic hepatic involvement was reported in 1650 (69.2%) of the total 2383 SSR-PET/CT imaging studies, whereas MRI detected hepatic involvement in 1685 (70.7%) cases. There were 51 (2.1%) false-negative and 16 (0.7%) false-positive cases. In case of discrepant reports, MRI and PET/CT were reviewed side by side for consensus reading. SSR-PET/CT demonstrated a sensitivity of 97.0% (95%CI: 96.0%, 97.7%), a specificity of 97.7% (95%CI: 96.3%, 98.7%), a PPV of 99.0% (95%CI: 98.4%, 99.4%) and NPV of 93.0% (95%CI: 91.0, 94.8%) in identifying hepatic involvement. The most frequent reason for false-negative results was the small size of lesions with the majority < 0.6 cm. Conclusion: This study confirms the high diagnostic accuracy of SSR-PET/CT in the detection of hepatic involvement in NET patients based on a patient-based analysis of metastatic hepatic involvement with a high sensitivity and specificity using liver MRI imaging as reference standard. However, one should be aware of possible pitfalls when a single imaging method is used in evaluating neuroendocrine liver metastases in patients.