Search

Background and Objective: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is used in critically ill patients that require respiratory and/or cardiac support. Cefiderocol is a novel siderophore antibiotic that may require use in infected critically ill patients supported by ECMO. The objective of this study was to determine the loss of cefiderocol through an ex vivo adult ECMO circuit using a Quadrox-iD oxygenator. Methods: A 3/8-inch, simulated, ex vivo closed-loop ECMO circuit was prepared with a Quadrox-iD adult oxygenator and primed with fresh whole blood. Cefiderocol was administered into the circuit to achieve a starting concentration of approximately 90 mg/L. Post-oxygenator blood samples were collected at 0, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 h after the addition of the drug to determine the loss in the circuit. A glass control jar was prepared with the same blood matrix and maintained at the same temperature to determine drug degradation. The experiment was conducted in triplicate. The rate of cefiderocol loss in the ECMO circuit was compared with that in the control by one-way analysis of variance. Results: At 0 h, the difference between the pre- and post-oxygenator concentrations was − 4 ± 4% (range 0 to − 7%). After 24 h, the cefiderocol percent reduction was similar between the ECMO circuit and control (50% ± 13 vs. 50% ± 9, p= 1.0). Conclusions: The degradation rate of cefiderocol did not differ significantly within the ECMO circuit and control, suggesting no loss due to sequestration or adsorption. Pharmacokinetic studies in patients supported by ECMO are warranted to determine final dosing recommendations.

With the implementation of the new heart transplant (HT) allocation system, patients requiring biventricular support systems have the highest priority, a shorter waitlist time, and a higher frequency of HT. However, the short-term and long-term outcomes of such patients are often disputed. Hence, we examined the outcomes of these patients who underwent HT before change in allocation scheme. Additionally, we compared post-HT outcomes of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) with other nondischargeable biventricular (BiVAD) supported patients. We identified adult ECMO or BiVAD supported HT recipients between 2000 and 2018 in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database. We compared survival with the Kaplan-Meier method. Using overlap propensity score weighting, we constructed Cox proportional hazards regression models to determine the risk-adjusted influence of BiVAD versusECMO on survival. Of the 730 patients HT recipients; 528 (72.3%) and 202 (27.7%) were bridged with BiVAD and ECMO, respectively. For BiVAD versusECMO patients, the 30-day, 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year mortality rates were 8.0% versus14.4%, 16.3% versus21.3%, 22.4% versus25.3%, and 26.3% versus25.7%, respectively. Risk-adjusted post-HT survival of BiVAD and ECMO patients at 30-day (HR 1.24 [95% CI, 0.68–2.27]; P= 0.4863), 1-year (HR 1.29 [95% CI, 0.80–2.09]; P= 0.3009), 3-year (HR 1.27 [95% CI, 0.83–1.94]; P= 0.2801), and 5-year (HR 1.35, 95% CI, 0.90–2.05; P= 0.1501) were similar. Around three-fourth of the ECMO or BiVAD supported patients were alive at 5-years post-HT. The short-term and long-term post-HT survivals of groups were comparable.

This guideline for the preparation for and undertaking of transport and retrieval of patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is intended for educational use to build the knowledge of physicians and other health professionals in assessing the conditions and managing the treatment of patients undergoing ECLS / ECMO and describe what are believed to be useful and safe practice for extracorporeal life support (ECLS, ECMO) but these are not necessarily consensus recommendations. The aim of clinical guidelines are to help clinicians to make informed decisions about their patients. However, adherence to a guideline does not guarantee a successful outcome. Ultimately, healthcare professionals must make their own treatment decisions about care on a case-by-case basis, after consultation with their patients, using their clinical judgement, knowledge and expertise. These guidelines do not take the place of physicians’ and other health professionals’ judgment in diagnosing and treatment of particular patients. These guidelines are not intended to and should not be interpreted as setting a standard of care or be deemed inclusive of all proper methods of care nor exclusive of other methods of care reasonably directed to obtaining the same results. The ultimate judgment must be made by the physician and other health professionals and the patient in light of all the circumstances presented by the individual patient, and the known variability and biological behavior of the clinical condition. These guidelines reflect the data at the time the guidelines were prepared; the results of subsequent studies or other information may cause revisions to the recommendations in these guidelines to be prudent to reflect new data, but ELSO is under no obligation to provide updates. In no event will ELSO be liable for any decision made or action taken in reliance upon the information provided through these guidelines.

Cardiac arrest in patients on mechanical support is a new phenomenon brought about by the increased use of this therapy in patients with end-stage heart failure. This American Heart Association scientific statement highlights the recognition and treatment of cardiovascular collapse or cardiopulmonary arrest in an adult or pediatric patient who has a ventricular assist device or total artificial heart. Specific, expert consensus recommendations are provided for the role of external chest compressions in such patients.