Search

Although there is now evidence of a role for N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors in nucleus accumbens (NAcc) neurons in the effects of chronic opiate treatment, the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying this phenomenon are still unclear. Therefore, we studied the effects of chronic morphine on the pharmacological and biophysical properties of NMDA receptors in freshly isolated medium spiny neurons from NAcc. We found that chronic morphine treatment did not alter the affinity for NMDA receptor agonists such as glutamate, homoquinolinic acid, and NMDA, but decreased the affinity of glycine, the allosteric NMDA receptor coagonist, from 2.24 +/- 0.15 microM to 5.1 +/- 1.45 microM. Chronic morphine treatment also altered the affinity of two noncompetitive NMDA receptor antagonists, 7-chloro-kynurenic acid and ifenprodil. However, morphine had no effect on a third antagonist, D-(-)-2-amino-5-phosphonopentanoic acid. Single-exponential fits of desensitized NMDA current tails gave tau values ranging from 0.5 to 4 s in neurons from both control and morphine-treated rats. However, a shift to the left of the distribution of tau values after morphine treatment revealed that NMDA current desensitization rate was accelerated in a majority of NAcc neurons. Taken together with our recent molecular studies, our data are consistent with a shift away from NMDA receptor subunit (NR) NR2B and 2C function toward increased NR2A subunit expression or function after chronic morphine, a process that could alter excitability and integrative properties and may represent a neuroadaptation of NAcc medium spiny neurons underlying morphine dependence.

In the course of studying N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors of the nucleus accumbens (NAcc), we found that 20% of freshly isolated medium spiny neurons, as well as all interneurons, responded in an unexpected way to long (5-s) coapplication of NMDA and glycine, the coagonist of NMDA receptors. Whereas the reversal potential of the peak NMDA current of this subset of neurons was still around 0 mV, the desensitizing current became outward at hyperpolarized potentials around -30 mV. A Cl(-)-free solution shifted the equilibrium potentials of the desensitized currents to around 0 mV. This outward current was not blocked by a Ca(2+)-free, Ba(2+)-containing solution, suggesting that the anionic conductance was not activated by Ca(2+) influx through NMDA receptor channels. Interestingly, glycine alone also evoked a current with a similar hyperpolarized reversal potential in this subset of neurons. The glycine current reversed around -50 mV, rectified outwardly, and inactivated strongly. Its desensitization was best fitted with a double exponential. Only the slow desensitization showed clear voltage dependence. The glycine current was not blocked by 200 microM picrotoxin and 10 microM zinc, was weakly antagonized by 1 microM strychnine, and was not enhanced by 1 microM zinc. In addition, 1 mM taurine, but not GABA, inactivated glycine currents, and 1 mM glycine occluded 10 mM taurine-mediated currents. These data indicate that a subset of nucleus accumbens neurons expresses glycine receptors and that either glycine or taurine could be an endogenous agonist for these receptors.