Search

The purpose of these studies was to support the hypothesis that an undiscovered cannabinoid receptor exists in brain. [(35)S]GTP gamma S binding was stimulated by anandamide and WIN55212-2 in brain membranes from both CB(1)(+/+) and CB(1)(-/-) mice. In contrast, a wide variety of other compounds that are known to activate CB(1) receptors, including CP55940, HU-210, and Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol, failed to stimulate [(35)S]GTP gamma S binding in CB(1)(-/-) membranes. In CB(1)(-/-) membranes, SR141716A affected both basal and anandamide- or WIN55212-2-induced stimulation of [(35)S]GTP gamma S binding only at concentrations greater than 1 microM. In CB(1)(+/+) membranes, SR141716A inhibited only 84% of anandamide and 67% of WIN55212-2 stimulated [(35)S]GTP gamma S binding with an affinity appropriate for mediation by CB(1) receptors (K(B) approximately 0.5 nM). The remaining stimulation seemed to be inhibited with lower potency (IC(50) approximately 5 microM) similar to that seen in CB(1)(-/-) membranes or in the absence of agonist. Further experiments determined that the effects of anandamide and WIN55212-2 were not additive, but that the effect of mu opioid, adenosine A1, and cannabinoid ligands were additive. Finally, assays of different central nervous system (CNS) regions demonstrated significant activity of cannabinoids in CB(1)(-/-) membranes from brain stem, cortex, hippocampus, diencephalon, midbrain, and spinal cord, but not basal ganglia or cerebellum. Moreover, some of these same CNS regions also showed significant binding of [(3)H]WIN55212-2, but not [(3)H]CP55940. Thus anandamide and WIN55212-2 seemed to be active in CB(1)(-/-) mouse brain membranes via a common G protein-coupled receptor with a distinct CNS distribution, implying the existence of an unknown cannabinoid receptor subtype in brain.

Many of the pharmacological effects of Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol are mediated through CB(1) and CB(2) cannabinoid receptors. However, with the discovery of endogenous cannabinoids, some discrepancies have arisen. Furthermore, unlike the CB(1) receptor, the sequences of the mouse and human CB(2) receptor are divergent, raising the possibility of species specificity. The gene for the rat CB(2) receptor was cloned, expressed, and its properties compared with those of mouse and human CB(2) receptors. Sequence analysis of the coding region of the rat CB(2) genomic clone indicates 90% nucleic acid identity (93% amino acid identity) between rat and mouse and 81% nucleic acid identity (81% amino acid identity) between rat and human. The rat CB(2) receptor was stably expressed in human embryonic kidney-293 cells to examine its pharmacology. The rat CB(2) showed low affinity for anandamide, an endogenous ligand shown to act at the CB(1) receptor. In contrast, high-affinity binding for SR144528 (CB(2)-selective antagonist) as well as several cannabinoid receptor agonists was observed. Coupling to adenylate cyclase was observed. Aspects of the pharmacology of palmitoylethanolamide were also examined. It bound to CB(1) and CB(2) receptors with low affinity and stimulated GTPgammaS binding in the cerebellum and CB(2)-expressing cell lines with low potency. The data in this study suggest that the discrepancies in affinities between rat and human may represent species differences. The rat CB(2) receptor genomic clone will be a useful tool for studying the function and regulation of CB(2) in rats.

In this study, we focused on the pharmacological characterization of cannabinoid receptor coupling to G protein-gated inwardly rectifying potassium (GIRK) channels. Cannabinoids were tested on Xenopus laevis oocytes coexpressing the CB(1) receptor and GIRK1 and GIRK4 channels (CB(1)/GIRK1/4) or the CB(2) receptor and GIRK1/4 channels (CB(2)/GIRK1/4). WIN 55,212-2 enhanced currents carried by GIRK channels in the CB(1)/GIRK1/4 and CB(2)/GIRK1/4 system; however, the CB(2) receptor did not couple efficiently to GIRK1/4 channels. In the CB(1)/GIRK1/4 system, WIN 55,212-2 was the most efficacious compound tested. CP 55,940 and anandamide acted as partial agonists. The rank order of potency was CP 55,940 > WIN 55,212-2 = anandamide. The CB(1)-selective antagonist SR141716A alone acted as a inverse agonist by inhibiting GIRK currents in oocytes expressing CB(1)/GIRK1/4, suggesting the CB(1) receptor is constitutively activated. A conserved aspartate residue, which was previously shown to be critical for G protein coupling in cannabinoid receptors, was mutated (to asparagine, D163N) and analyzed. Oocytes coexpressing CB(1)/GIRK1/4 or D163N/GIRK1/4 were compared. The potency of WIN 55, 212-2 at the mutant receptor was similar to wild type, but its efficacy was substantially reduced. CP 55,940 did not elicit currents in oocytes expressing D163N/GIRK1/4. In summary, it appears the CB(1) and CB(2) receptors couple differently to GIRK1/4 channels. In the CB(1)/GIRK1/4 system, cannabinoids evaluated demonstrated the ability to enhance or inhibit GIRK currents. Furthermore, a conserved aspartate residue in the CB(1) receptor is required for normal communication with GIRK channels in oocytes demonstrating the interaction between receptor and channels is G protein dependent.

Cannabinoid receptors are members of the superfamily of G protein-coupled receptors. Their activation has previously been shown to stimulate guanosine 5'-O-(3-[35S]thio)-triphosphate ([35S]GTP gamma S) binding in a range of brain regions using both membrane preparations and autoradiography. This study evaluates the activities of structurally diverse cannabinoid receptor ligands in the GTP gamma S binding assay, comparing the relationship between receptor binding and activation and also examining efficacy differences between compounds. Using rat cerebellar membrane preparations, the effects of GDP concentration on GTP gamma S binding and the activities of a range of cannabinoid receptor ligands, including the CB1 selective antagonist SR141716A, were investigated. GDP concentration was found to have differing effects on cannabinoid-stimulated [35S]GTP gamma S binding depending on the nature of the agonist used. The stimulation produced by high efficacy compounds, such as CP 55,940 and WIN 55212-2, was increased by raising the GDP concentration, but that of a low efficacy agonist, (-)-delta-tetrahydrocannabinol, was decreased. Of the cannabinoid compounds tested, a wide range of potencies (EC50) and levels of maximal stimulation (Emax) were observed. These ranged from CP 55,244 (Emax of 165, 148-183%, and an EC50 of 0.47, 0.22-0.96, nM) through (-)-delta-tetrahydrocannabinol, cannabinol and anandamide, which produced no concentration-dependent stimulation of [35S]GTP gamma S binding under the same conditions. SR141716A competitively antagonized all the agonists against which it was tested, providing equilibrium dissociation constants (Kd values) in the sub-nanomolar range (0.06-0.40 nM), implicating a CB1 receptor mediated response. These results provide a more detailed characterization of the cannabinoid-stimulated [35S]GTP gamma S binding assay than has previously been reported.

Examination of 140 collections of Chara zeylanicafrom 3 southwestern states shows that a strong dichotomy exists in the collections. Some produce 4‐plated antheridia while others produce 8‐plated antheridia. Absolute separation of the study material is possible on the basis of plate number. In addition, 3 other characters (length/width ratio of oospores; fertility of first branchlet node; and number of distal ecorticate branchlet internodes) show strong correlation with the antheridial type. Preliminary chromosomal work indicates that a segregation at this level may also be possible. In 4‐plated collections examined, n= 28; 8‐plated collections are usually n= 56; however, a few 8‐plated collections are n= 42. No conclusion has been reached regarding the status of the latter collections.