Abe, Makoto, Yamada, Takahisa, Morita, Takashi, Furukawa, Yoshio, Tamaki, Shunsuke, Kawasaki, Masato, Kikuchi, Atsushi, Kawai, Tsutomu, Seo, Masahiro, Nakamura, Jun, Yamamoto, Kyoko, Kayama, Kiyomi, Kawahira, Masatsugu, Tanabe, Kazuya, Fukunami, Masatake, Yasumura, Yoshio, Uematsu, Masaaki, Higuchi, Yoshiharu, Nakagawa, Yusuke, Fuji, Hisakazu, Nishino, Masami, Hikoso, Shungo, Nakatani, Daisaku, and Sakata, Yasushi
Background:The objective nutritional indices such as the Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score, Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) and Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) are useful for the prediction of prognosis in patients (pts) with heart failure. However, there is no information available on the prognostic value of the combination of these objective nutritional indices in pts with heart failure with preserved LVEF (HFpEF) who are admitted with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF).Purpose:We sought to assess the usefulness of the combined objective nutritional score (CONS) for the prediction of post-discharge clinical outcome in ADHF pts with HFpEF.Methods:Data were extracted from The Prospective mUlticenteR obServational stUdy of patIenTs with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (PURSUIT HFpEF) study. PURSUIT-HFpEF study is a prospective multicenter observational study in which collaborating hospitals in Osaka recorded clinical, echocardiographic, and outcome data of ADHF pts with HFpEF. We analyzed 296 pts with survival discharge. Venous blood sampling, echocardiography, and measurement of body weight were performed just before discharge. CONUT score, GNRI and PNI were calculated as previously reported. We determined CONS by assigning 1 point each for high CONUT score (5-12), low GNRI (<92) or low PNI (?38). The study endpoint was all-cause death.Results:During a follow-up period of 1.2?0.5years, 41 pts had all-cause death. Multivariate Cox analysis showed that CONS was independently associated with all-cause death (p=0.0065). When the pts were stratified into the three groups based on CONS (normal nutritional status: 0 point, mild-to-moderate malnutrition: 1-2 points, severe malnutrition: 3 points), the incidence of all-cause death appeared to increase in relation to the score (normal: 7%, mild-to moderate: 16%, severe: 26%, p=0.0003).Conclusion:CONS is a useful tool to risk stratify ADHF pts with HFpEF.