Search

BACKGROUND: Little has been published regarding how doctors think and talk about prognosis and the potential benefits of adjuvant therapy.OBJECTIVE: We sought predictions of survival rates and survival times, for patients with and without adjuvant therapy, from the clinicians of patients participating in a randomised trial of adjuvant sorafenib after nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma.METHODS: A subset of medical oncologists and urologists in the SORCE trial completed questionnaires eliciting their predictions of survival rates and survival times, with and without adjuvant sorafenib, for each of their participating patients. To compare predictions elicited as survival times versus survival rates, we transformed survival times to survival rates. To compare predicted benefits elicited as absolute improvements in rates and times, we transformed them into hazard ratios (HR), a measure of relative benefit.We postulated that a plausible benefit in overall survival (OS) should be smaller than that hypothesized for disease–free survival (DFS) in the trials original sample size justification (i.e. HR for OS should be = 0.75).RESULTS: Sixty–one medical oncologists and 17 urologists completed questionnaires on 216 patients between 2007 and 2013. Predictions of survival without adjuvant sorafenib were similar whether elicited as survival rates or survival times (median 5–year survival rate of 61% vs 60%, p?=?0.6). Predicted benefits of sorafenib were larger when elicited as improvements in survival rates than survival times (median HR 0.76 vs 0.83, p < 0.0001). The proportion of HR for predicted OS with sorafenib that reflected a plausible benefit (smaller effect of sorafenib on OS than hypothesized on DFS, i.e. HR = 0.75) was 51% for survival rates, and 65% for survival times.CONCLUSIONS: The predicted benefits of adjuvant sorafenib were larger when elicited as improvements in survival rates than as survival times, and were often larger than the sample size justification for the trial. These potential biases should be considered when thinking and talking about individual patients in clinical practice, and when designing clinical trials.

The use of conventionally fractionated intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in the management of oligometastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is currently poorly characterised in the literature. To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of IMRT for intraabdominal and retroperitoneal RCC oligometastases. Retrospective analysis of 14 patients with oligometastatic RCC treated with IMRT with the aim of inducing long-term control. Indications for radiotherapy included bleeding abdominal mass (5 patients), solitary renal bed recurrence (5 patients) and isolated, asymptomatic pancreatic mass (4 patients). The prescribed radiotherapy dose was 50 Gray in 20 to 25 fractions. Patients were followed up long-term using regular cross-sectional imaging and clinical review to assess local and distant disease control and treatment related toxicity. At median follow up of 33.5 (6–68) months, 12 patients remain alive (86%), of whom 11 (92%) have no evidence of local recurrence. Six patients (43%) developed further metastatic disease, of whom 4 (67%) received systemic treatment. Median duration of local control was 33.5 months, and 1- and 3-year overall survival (OS) was 92.9% and 85.7% respectively. No treatment-related toxicities ≥ grade 3 and no long-term sequelae were observed. IMRT to intra-abdominal and retroperitoneal metastasis in oligo-metastatic RCC can be delivered safely, provide durable responses and excellent longer-term survival if given to a sufficiently high dose over a conventionally fractionated course. Our study is the first to date with long-term follow up to evaluate the role of IMRT in such cases and has important implications for treatment of oligometastatic RCC.

Background: The use of conventionally fractionated intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in the management of oligometastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is currently poorly characterised in the literature.Objective: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of IMRT for intraabdominal and retroperitoneal RCC oligometastases.Methods: Retrospective analysis of 14 patients with oligometastatic RCC treated with IMRT with the aim of inducing long-term control. Indications for radiotherapy included bleeding abdominal mass (5 patients), solitary renal bed recurrence (5 patients) and isolated, asymptomatic pancreatic mass (4 patients). The prescribed radiotherapy dose was 50 Gray in 20 to 25 fractions. Patients were followed up long-term using regular cross-sectional imaging and clinical review to assess local and distant disease control and treatment related toxicity.Results: At median follow up of 33.5 (6–68) months, 12 patients remain alive (86%), of whom 11 (92%) have no evidence of local recurrence. Six patients (43%) developed further metastatic disease, of whom 4 (67%) received systemic treatment. Median duration of local control was 33.5 months, and 1- and 3-year overall survival (OS) was 92.9% and 85.7% respectively. No treatment-related toxicities = grade 3 and no long-term sequelae were observed.Conclusions: IMRT to intra-abdominal and retroperitoneal metastasis in oligo-metastatic RCC can be delivered safely, provide durable responses and excellent longer-term survival if given to a sufficiently high dose over a conventionally fractionated course. Our study is the first to date with long-term follow up to evaluate the role of IMRT in such cases and has important implications for treatment of oligometastatic RCC.

Lymph-node metastasis is an indicator of poor prognosis for patients with melanoma. The management of regional nodes is controversial, with continuing debate about whether surgery or radiotherapy of positive lymph nodes improves long-term survival or whether nodal involvement is merely a marker of aggressive disease. However, there is general agreement that systemic chemotherapy is rarely an effective form of management. This review therefore considers surgical and radiotherapeutic aspects of lymph-node management in patients with melanoma. We discuss regional control and survival after lymph-node surgery in retrospective series, randomised trials of elective lymph-node dissection, the role of 'sentinel' lymph-node biopsy, radiobiology and radiotherapy fractionation issues in melanoma treatment, retrospective studies of adjuvant nodal radiotherapy, and finally, randomised trials of adjuvant radiotherapy after lymph-node dissection.

Cabozantinib monotherapy is approved in the UK for patients with treatment-naïve intermediate- or poor-risk advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC), or patients who received prior vascular endothelial growth factor-targeted therapy. Data are limited on the real-world use of cabozantinib for aRCC.