Search

We describe caspofungin pharmacokinetics (PK) after the first and fourth doses in 20 critically ill septic patients. Monte Carlo simulation was used to analyze the probability of target attainment (PTA) (AUC/MIC > 865) for Candidaspp. Caspofungin concentrations were analyzed by HPLC in plasma and urine. A great variability in PK parameters was observed after both doses. Patients were divided in two groups according to their AUC values (AUC ≤ 75 mg h/L cut-off). In the low-AUC group Cmax, Cmin and AUC were lower, while Vd and Cl were higher than in the high-AUC group (p < 0.05, both at day 1 and 4). The mean 24-h urinary recovery of the drug was 8 ± 6.3% (day1) and 9.8 ± 6.3 (day4). Monte Carlo simulation analysis (0.03–1 mg/L MIC-range) showed that PTA was guaranteed only for MICs ≤ 0.03 mg/L in the low-AUC group, and for MICs ≤ 0.06 mg/L in the high-AUC group. No group had a PTA ≥ 90% for 0.125 mg/L MIC (the epidemiological cut-off). Mortality was higher in low-AUC group (p < 0.01). In our ‘real-world’ population, no clinical data can predict which patient will have lower, suboptimal caspofungin exposure, therefore we suggest TDM to optimize caspofungin therapy and reduce the risk of selecting resistances (CEAVC, 32366/2015; OSS.15.114, NCT03798600).

We investigated the pharmacokinetics of meropenem after the first and tenth im administration in patients with respiratory tract infections. Ten patients (mean age 63.8±5.2 years) received meropenem 500 mg tds for at least ten doses, and plasma and urine antibiotic concentrations were determined by microbiological assay. After the first injection a mean peak plasma concentration of 7.93±1.29 mg/L was observed at 1 h. Trough levels at 8 h (0.29±0.16 mg/L) were detectable in five of ten treated patients. The mean terminal half-life was 1.08±0.2 h with an area under the curve (AUC) value of 23.8±4.59 mg/L.h, and a cumulative urinary recovery at 8 h of 48.43±3.12%. There was no evidence of change in the pharmacokinetics of ineropenem after repeated im administration, though the mean peak plasma concentration and AUC value were slightly increased. The accumulation ratio (assessed using AUC values) was 1.18±0.19 after multiple doses and was considered to be of little kinetic and clinical importance. Moreover, many of the trough concentrations of meropenem were below the limit of detection of the assay. After im administration meropenem concentrations exceeded 0.5 mg/L for longer than previously described following iv infusion. No adverse events were reported.

Twenty-four patients undergoing monolateral or bilateral total knee replacement (TKR) procedures were randomized to receive teicoplanin (T) either systemically or regionally. Subjects scheduled for systemic prophylaxis and undergoing monolateral (six patients) or bilateral (five patients) TKR received a single 800-mg dose of T in 100 ml of saline as a 5-min infusion into a forearm vein 2.5 h before surgery. For regional prophylaxis, patients undergoing monolateral surgery (eight subjects) received 400 mg of T in 100 ml of saline as a 5-min infusion into a foot vein of the leg to be operated on immediately after the tourniquet was inflated. For the five patients scheduled for bilateral operation and regional prophylaxis, the administration of T was also repeated for the second knee operation. The tourniquet, as the standard TKR surgical technique, was inflated to 400 mm Hg (c. 50 kPa) in all 24 patients immediately before the beginning of surgery and kept in place for the duration of the operation. Samples of serum, bone, skin, synovia, and subcutaneous tissue were collected at timed intervals during surgery. They were microbiologically assayed for T by using Bacillus subtilis as the test organism. Overall, the mean T concentrations obtained with regional route prophylaxis were found to be 2 to 10 times higher than those achieved following systemic prophylaxis. Moreover, peak levels in different tissues after regional prophylaxis were significantly higher (P < 0.05). None of the patients experienced adverse effects due to regional or systemic T administration; no prosthetic or wound infections were observed in the follow-up period (from 12 to 26 months).

The pharmacokinetics of azithromycin were determined over a 192-h period following oral administration of a single 500-mg dose to six healthy volunteers and to 16 cirrhotic patients (ten class A and six class B; Pughs classification). Plasma and urinary levels were determined by microbiological assay. The mean Cmax obtained 2–3 h after administration, was 0.29 mg/L in volunteers, and 0.39 and 0.51 mg/L in class A and class B cirrhosis, respectively. The elimination half-life was 53.5 h in control subjects, and 60.6 and 68.1 h in class A and class B cirrhotic patients, respectively. The mean residence time was significantly higher in class B patients, but AUC, Vd, Cltot, and Clr, values appeared to be similar in all groups. The mean urinary recovery of azithromycin at 192 h varied from 11–15.7%, and did not differ significantly among groups. These results demonstrate that azithromycin pharmacokinetics do not differ consistently in patients with mild or moderate hepatic impairment in comparison with healthy volunteers. Therefore, no dosage modifications of azithromycin seem to be required for patients with class A or B liver cirrhosis.