8 results on '"Coventry, Peter"'
Search Results
2. Can we mitigate the psychological impacts of social isolation using behavioural activation? Long-term results of the UK BASIL urgent public health COVID-19 pilot randomised controlled trial and living systematic review
- Author
-
Littlewood, Elizabeth, McMillan, Dean, Chew Graham, Carolyn, Bailey, Della, Gascoyne, Samantha, Sloane, Claire, Burke, Lauren, Coventry, Peter, Crosland, Suzanne, Fairhurst, Caroline, Henry, Andrew, Hewitt, Catherine, Baird, Kalpita, Ryde, Eloise, Shearsmith, Leanne, Traviss-Turner, Gemma, Woodhouse, Rebecca, Webster, Judith, Meader, Nick, Churchill, Rachel, Eddy, Elizabeth, Heron, Paul, Hicklin, Nisha, Shafran, Roz, Almeida, Osvaldo, Clegg, Andrew, Gentry, Tom, Hill, Andrew, Lovell, Karina, Dexter-Smith, Sarah, Ekers, David, and Gilbody, Simon
- Abstract
BackgroundBehavioural and cognitive interventions remain credible approaches in addressing loneliness and depression. There was a need to rapidly generate and assimilate trial-based data during COVID-19.ObjectivesWe undertook a parallel pilot RCT of behavioural activation (a brief behavioural intervention) for depression and loneliness (Behavioural Activation in Social Isolation, the BASIL-C19 trial ISRCTN94091479). We also assimilate these data in a living systematic review (PROSPERO CRD42021298788) of cognitive and/or behavioural interventions.MethodsParticipants (≥65 years) with long-term conditions were computer randomised to behavioural activation (n=47) versus care as usual (n=49). Primary outcome was PHQ-9. Secondary outcomes included loneliness (De Jong Scale). Data from the BASIL-C19 trial were included in a metanalysis of depression and loneliness.FindingsThe 12 months adjusted mean difference for PHQ-9 was −0.70 (95% CI −2.61 to 1.20) and for loneliness was −0.39 (95% CI −1.43 to 0.65).The BASIL-C19 living systematic review (12 trials) found short-term reductions in depression (standardised mean difference (SMD)=−0.31, 95% CI −0.51 to −0.11) and loneliness (SMD=−0.48, 95% CI −0.70 to −0.27). There were few long-term trials, but there was evidence of some benefit (loneliness SMD=−0.20, 95% CI −0.40 to −0.01; depression SMD=−0.20, 95% CI −0.47 to 0.07).DiscussionWe delivered a pilot trial of a behavioural intervention targeting loneliness and depression; achieving long-term follow-up. Living meta-analysis provides strong evidence of short-term benefit for loneliness and depression for cognitive and/or behavioural approaches. A fully powered BASIL trial is underway.Clinical implicationsScalable behavioural and cognitive approaches should be considered as population-level strategies for depression and loneliness on the basis of a living systematic review.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Characteristics of Psychological Interventions That Improve Depression in People With Coronary Heart Disease
- Author
-
Dickens, Chris, Cherrington, Andrea, Adeyemi, Isabel, Roughley, Kate, Bower, Peter, Garrett, Charlotte, Bundy, Christine, and Coventry, Peter
- Abstract
Despite previous intervention trials, it is unclear which psychological treatments are most effective for people with coronary heart disease (CHD). We have conducted a systematic review with meta-regression to identify the characteristics of psychological interventions that improve depression and depressive symptoms among people with CHD.
- Published
- 2013
4. Does pulmonary rehabilitation reduce anxiety and depression in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
- Author
-
Coventry, Peter A
- Abstract
Symptoms of anxiety and depression are prevalent in at least 20–40% of patients with moderate-to-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and are known to affect prognosis and worsen quality of life. This review examines whether pulmonary rehabilitation can effectively improve psychological status in COPD patients.
- Published
- 2009
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. Nature-based outdoor activities for mental and physical health: Systematic review and meta-analysis
- Author
-
Coventry, Peter A., Brown, JenniferV.E., Pervin, Jodi, Brabyn, Sally, Pateman, Rachel, Breedvelt, Josefien, Gilbody, Simon, Stancliffe, Rachel, McEachan, Rosemary, and White, PiranC.L.
- Abstract
Mental health problems are associated with lower quality of life, increased unscheduled care, high economic and social cost, and increased mortality. Nature-based interventions (NBIs) that support people to engage with nature in a structured way are asset-based solutions to improve mental health for community based adults. However, it is unclear which NBIs are most effective, or what format and dose is most efficacious. We systematically reviewed the controlled and uncontrolled evidence for outdoor NBIs. The protocol was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42020163103). Studies that included adults (aged ≥18 years) in community-based settings with or without mental and/or physical health problems were eligible for inclusion. Eligible interventions were structured outdoor activities in green and/or blue space for health and wellbeing. We searched ASSIA, CENTRAL, Embase, Greenfile, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Web of Science in October 2019; the search was updated in September 2020. We screened 14,321 records and included 50 studies. Sixteen studies were randomised controlled trials (RCTs); 18 were controlled studies; and 16 were uncontrolled before and after studies. Risk of bias for RCTs was low to moderate; and moderate to high for controlled and uncontrolled studies. Random effects meta-analysis of RCTs showed that NBIs were effective for improving depressive mood −0.64 (95% CI: 1.05 to −0.23), reducing anxiety −0.94 (95% CI: 0.94 to −0.01), improving positive affect 0.95 (95% CI: 0.59 to 1.31), and reducing negative affect −0.52 (95% CI: 0.77 to −0.26). Results from controlled and uncontrolled studies largely reflected findings from RCTs. There was less evidence that NBIs improved physical health. The most effective interventions were offered for between 8 and 12 weeks, and the optimal dose ranged from 20 to 90 min. NBIs, specifically gardening, green exercise and nature-based therapy, are effective for improving mental health outcomes in adults, including those with pre-existing mental health problems.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Self management of patients with mild COPD in primary care: randomised controlled trial
- Author
-
Jolly, Kate, Sidhu, Manbinder S, Hewitt, Catherine A, Coventry, Peter A, Daley, Amanda, Jordan, Rachel, Heneghan, Carl, Singh, Sally, Ives, Natalie, Adab, Peymane, Jowett, Susan, Varghese, Jinu, Nunan, David, Ahmed, Khaled, Dowson, Lee, and Fitzmaurice, David
- Abstract
ObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of telephone health coaching delivered by a nurse to support self management in a primary care population with mild symptoms of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).DesignMulticentre randomised controlled trial.Setting71 general practices in four areas of England.Participants577 patients with Medical Research Council dyspnoea scale scores of 1 or 2, recruited from primary care COPD registers with spirometry confirmed diagnosis. Patients were randomised to telephone health coaching (n=289) or usual care (n=288).InterventionsTelephone health coaching intervention delivered by nurses, underpinned by Social Cognitive Theory. The coaching promoted accessing smoking cessation services, increasing physical activity, medication management, and action planning (4 sessions over 11 weeks; postal information at weeks 16 and 24). The nurses received two days of training. The usual care group received a leaflet about COPD.Main outcome measuresThe primary outcome was health related quality of life at 12 months using the short version of the St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ-C).ResultsThe intervention was delivered with good fidelity: 86% of scheduled calls were delivered; 75% of patients received all four calls. 92% of patients were followed-up at six months and 89% at 12 months. There was no difference in SGRQ-C total score at 12 months (mean difference −1.3, 95% confidence interval −3.6 to 0.9, P=0.23). Compared with patients in the usual care group, at six months follow-up, the intervention group reported greater physical activity, more had received a care plan (44% v30%), rescue packs of antibiotics (37% v29%), and inhaler use technique check (68% v55%).ConclusionsA new telephone health coaching intervention to promote behaviour change in primary care patients with mild symptoms of dyspnoea did lead to changes in self management activities, but did not improve health related quality of life.Trial registrationCurrent controlled trials ISRCTN 06710391
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. Integrated primary care for patients with mental and physical multimorbidity: cluster randomised controlled trial of collaborative care for patients with depression comorbid with diabetes or cardiovascular disease
- Author
-
Coventry, Peter, Lovell, Karina, Dickens, Chris, Bower, Peter, Chew-Graham, Carolyn, McElvenny, Damien, Hann, Mark, Cherrington, Andrea, Garrett, Charlotte, Gibbons, Chris J, Baguley, Clare, Roughley, Kate, Adeyemi, Isabel, Reeves, David, Waheed, Waquas, and Gask, Linda
- Abstract
ObjectiveTo test the effectiveness of an integrated collaborative care model for people with depression and long term physical conditions.DesignCluster randomised controlled trial.Setting36 general practices in the north west of England.Participants387 patients with a record of diabetes or heart disease, or both, who had depressive symptoms (≥10 on patient health questionaire-9 (PHQ-9)) for at least two weeks. Mean age was 58.5 (SD 11.7). Participants reported a mean of 6.2 (SD 3.0) long term conditions other than diabetes or heart disease; 240 (62%) were men; 360 (90%) completed the trial.InterventionsCollaborative care included patient preference for behavioural activation, cognitive restructuring, graded exposure, and/or lifestyle advice, management of drug treatment, and prevention of relapse. Up to eight sessions of psychological treatment were delivered by specially trained psychological wellbeing practitioners employed by Improving Access to Psychological Therapy services in the English National Health Service; integration of care was enhanced by two treatment sessions delivered jointly with the practice nurse. Usual care was standard clinical practice provided by general practitioners and practice nurses.Main outcome measuresThe primary outcome was reduction in symptoms of depression on the self reported symptom checklist-13 depression scale (SCL-D13) at four months after baseline assessment. Secondary outcomes included anxiety symptoms (generalised anxiety disorder 7), self management (health education impact questionnaire), disability (Sheehan disability scale), and global quality of life (WHOQOL-BREF).Results19 general practices were randomised to collaborative care and 20 to usual care; three practices withdrew from the trial before patients were recruited. 191 patients were recruited from practices allocated to collaborative care, and 196 from practices allocated to usual care. After adjustment for baseline depression score, mean depressive scores were 0.23 SCL-D13 points lower (95% confidence interval −0.41 to −0.05) in the collaborative care arm, equal to an adjusted standardised effect size of 0.30. Patients in the intervention arm also reported being better self managers, rated their care as more patient centred, and were more satisfied with their care. There were no significant differences between groups in quality of life, disease specific quality of life, self efficacy, disability, and social support.ConclusionsCollaborative care that incorporates brief low intensity psychological therapy delivered in partnership with practice nurses in primary care can reduce depression and improve self management of chronic disease in people with mental and physical multimorbidity. The size of the treatment effects were modest and were less than the prespecified effect but were achieved in a trial run in routine settings with a deprived population with high levels of mental and physical multimorbidity.Trial registration ISRCTN80309252.
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. Author’s reply to Sharpe
- Author
-
Coventry, Peter A
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.