Search

Your search keyword '"Cassady, R"' showing total 4 results
Start Over Author "Cassady, R" Publication Type Magazines
4 results on '"Cassady, R"'

1. Avoiding sanctions: what petitioners and patent owners should know about the new rules for trial practice and procedure before the PTAB.

Author

Lavenue, Lionel M., Chen, W. Caroline, Cassady, R. Benjamin, and Daneshvar, Saba N.

Subjects
Patent law -- Practice, United States. Patent Trial and Appeal Board -- Practice, America Invents Act of 2011
Abstract

The 2011 Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA) created the popular post-patent issuance proceedings conducted by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB): (1) inter partes review (IPR), (2) post-grant review [...]

Published
2016

2. Differing pleading standards for willful infringement after Halo.

Author

Lavenue, Lionel M., Cassady, R. Benjamin, and High, Robert K.

Subjects
Pleadings -- Standards, Intent (Law) -- Laws, regulations and rules, Patent infringement -- Laws, regulations and rules -- Remedies, Halo Electronics, Inc. v. Pulse Electronics, Inc. (136 S. Ct. 1923 (2016)), Government regulation
Abstract

Willful infringement in patent litigation is rooted in punishing culpable and intentional infringers. The beneficiaries of that punishment--the patent owners--can receive up to three times the damages resulting from the [...]

Published
2017

3. Making the Nonprevailing Party Pay: Statistics on Exceptional Cases Four Years after Octane and Highmark.

Author

Cassady, R. Benjamin, Lavenue, Lionel M., and Damon, Sean D.

Subjects
PATENT suits, ADMINISTRATIVE fees, PATENT infringement
Abstract

The article discusses the impact of the Octane Fitness LLC v. ICON Health & Fitness Inc. cases on standard of awarding attorney fees in patent litigation, and mentions background information on 1946 Patent Act. Topics discussed include fitness firm Octane sued for patent infringement with victory of Octane of summary judgment of noninfringement, influence of Octane on patent practitioners filing, and chances for defendants to meet the statutory need for prevailing party.

Published
2018

4. MAKING THE NONPREVAILING PARTY PAY.

Author

Lavenue, Lionel M., Damon, Sean D., and Cassady, R. Benjamin

Subjects
HIGHMARK Inc. v. Allcare Health Management Systems Inc. (Supreme Court case), LAWYERS' fees, JUDICIAL review, LEGAL costs, ACTIONS & defenses (Law)
Abstract

The article explores the statistics of exceptional cases filed after the decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court for Octane Fitness LLC v. ICON Health and Fitness Inc. and Highmark Inc. v. Allcare Health Mgmt. Sys. Inc. It mentions the rejection by the Court of the shifting of attorney's fees and the standard of review framework for the fees, the awarding of reasonable fees to the prevailing party in exceptional cases and the increase in the number of attorney's fee motions after the two cases.

Published
2016

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results