1. Is planned vaginal delivery for breech presentation at term still an option? Results of an observational prospective survey in France and Belgium
- Author
-
Goffinet, FrancOis, Carayol, Marion, Foidart, Jean-Michel, Alexander, Sophie, Uzan, Serge, Subtil, Damien, and Breart, GeRard
- Subjects
Childbirth -- Surveys ,Public health -- Surveys ,Health - Abstract
To link to full-text access for this article, visit this link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2005.10.817 Byline: Francois Goffinet (a)(b), Marion Carayol (a), Jean-Michel Foidart (c), Sophie Alexander (d), Serge Uzan (e), Damien Subtil (f), Gerard Breart (a)(e) Abstract: A large trial published in 2000 concluded that planned vaginal delivery of term breech births is associated with high neonatal risks. Because the obstetric practices in that study differed from those in countries where planned vaginal delivery is still common, we conducted an observational prospective study to describe neonatal outcome according to the planned mode of delivery for term breech births in 2 such countries. Author Affiliation: (a) INSERM U149, Epidemiological Research Unit on Perinatal Health and Women's Health, Universite Pierre et Marie Curie Paris VI, HA[acute accent]pital Tenon (b) Universite Paris-Descartes Paris 5, Faculte de medecine, Service de gynecologie et obstetrique de Port-Royal, HA[acute accent]pital Cochin Saint-Vincent-de-Paul, Assistance Publique-HA[acute accent]pitaux de Paris, France (c) Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, La Citadelle Hospital, Liege, Belgium (d) School of Public Health School, Bruxelles, Belgium (e) Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Tenon Hospital, Assistance Publique-HA[acute accent]pitaux de Paris, Universite Pierre et Marie Curie Paris VI, France (f) Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Jeanne de Flandre Hospital, Lille Cedex, France Article History: Received 30 June 2005; Revised 30 September 2005; Accepted 27 October 2005 Article Note: (footnote) Supported by 2 grants from the Ministry of Health (AOM01123 [PH-RC 2001] and AOM03040 [PH-RC 2003]). It was also partly funded by the French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians, the French Society of Perinatal Medicine, and the Belgian National Funds for Scientific Research. The funding sources had no role in the study design, data collection, data interpretation, or the writing of the report. Reprints not available from the authors.
- Published
- 2006