Search

SummaryObjective: To compare the plasma glucose (PG) response with a fixed mixture of 25 insulin lispro and 75 NPL (Mix25), prior to a meal and 3 h before exercise, to human insulin 30/70 (30/70) in patients with type 2 diabetes.Research design and methods: Thirty-seven patients were treated in a randomized, open-label, 8-week, two-period crossover study. Mix25 was injected 5 min before breakfast and dinner throughout the study, as was 30/70 on inpatient test days and on outpatient dose titration days. Following the 4-week outpatient phase, patients were hospitalized, and exercised at a heart rate of 120 beats/min on a cycle ergometer two times for 30 min, separated by 30 min rest, starting 3 h after a 339 kcal breakfast.Results: The 2-h postprandial PG was significantly lower with Mix25 ((mean ± SEM) 10.5 ± 0.4 mmol/lvs 11.6 ± 0.4 mmol/l; p  0.016). Maximum decrease in PG from onset of exercise to end of exercise was significantly less with Mix25 (-3.6 ± 0.29 mmol/l vs -4.7 ± 0.31 mmol/l; p  0.001). The maximum decrease in PG over 6 h, after exercise onset, was significantly less with Mix25 (-4.3 ± 0.4 mmol/l vs -5.9 ± 0.4 mmol/l; p < 0.001). The frequency of hypoglycemia (blood glucose (BG) < 3 mmol/l or symptoms) during the inpatient test was not different between treatments. During the outpatient phase, the frequency of patient-recorded hypoglycemia was significantly lower with Mix25 (0.7 ± 0.2 episodes/30d vs 1.2 ± 0.3 episodes/30 d; p  0.042).Conclusions: Mix25 resulted in better postprandial PG control without an increase in exercise-induced hypoglycemia. The smaller decrease in PG during the postprandial phase after exercise may suggest a lower risk of exercise-induced hypoglycemia with Mix25 than with human insulin 30/70, especially for patients in tight glycemic control.

Breast volume measurements were made on 47 adult subjects using a casting method. After drying, fast-setting plaster casts were filled with sand of known density to a level approximating the curvature of the chest wall. The reliability of both sand filling and casting proved to be high, r = 0·97, and r = 0·99, respectively. The total variable error was 10·2%. The effects of position (standing versus lying) was investigated in a separate sample of 15 subjects. No significant difference (P > 0·05) was found between methods. The relationship between breast volume, girths, skinfolds, and body density was reported to be low.