Search

From producing individual blood components for transfusion to the removal of pathogenic substances, apheresis is a cornerstone of modern medical therapies. The use of therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE), in which plasma and its soluble constituents are removed from the body in exchange for a replacement fluid, can be organ- and life-saving in many diseases. Given the notable similarities between TPE and hemodialysis, the nephrologist is often responsible for managing TPE. As such, one must be familiar with the technologies, approach to therapy, indications for use, and complications. TPE uses centrifugation or membrane separation technologies, with the latter able to be performed with certain hemodialysis machines familiar to the nephrologist. Furthermore, primary kidney diseases such as anti–glomerular basement membrane disease are frequently associated with autoantibodies, potentially making them ideal candidates for TPE. Nevertheless, the use of TPE in many kidney diseases is controversial because of the lack of supporting evidence. This review discusses TPE from the perspective of a nephrologist responsible for prescribing and managing TPE, as well as nephrologists engaged in the care of patients undergoing the procedure.

Policies that prevent undocumented immigrants in the United States from receiving a donated organ are not only cruel and unfair, but also fail the cost-effectiveness test.

Introduction: Up to 30% of CML patients will require a therapeutic change during follow-up due to intolerance and/or resistance to first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) approach. In this context, bosutinib (BOS) has not only demonstrated its efficacy, but also presents a favorable safety profile, without comorbid conditions representing an absolute contraindication to its use., Methods: To gain further into BOS treatment in real life, we conducted a retrospective analysis on the outcome of CML patients receiving BOS in 18 hematological centers, all belonging to the "REL" (Lombard Hematology Network)., Results: Of 546 regularly followed CML cases, a total of 132 patients were reported as being treated with BOS, most frequently (62.9%) in second line. Interestingly, most patients (63.6%) switched to BOS due to intolerance to the previous TKI, while resistance to the last treatment was reported in the remaining 36.4% of patients. Despite a permanent discontinuation rate of 18.9%, over 80% of patients achieved at least a major molecular response and seven cases were able to attempt treatment-free remission., Conclusion: Although in this survey BOS represented the preferred option especially in patients intolerant rather than resistant to previous TKIs, we confirmed that BOS represents a safe and effective therapeutic option beyond the first line in the real-life setting., (© 2024 S. Karger AG, Basel.)