Search

Developing AI models for digital pathology has traditionally relied on single-scale analysis of histopathology slides. However, a whole slide image is a rich digital representation of the tissue, captured at various magnification levels. Limiting our analysis to a single scale overlooks critical information, spanning from intricate high-resolution cellular details to broad low-resolution tissue structures. In this study, we propose a model-agnostic multiresolution feature aggregation framework tailored for the analysis of histopathology slides in the context of breast cancer, on a multicohort dataset of 2038 patient samples. We have adapted 9 state-of-the-art multiple instance learning models on our multi-scale methodology and evaluated their performance on grade prediction, TP53 mutation status prediction and survival prediction. The results prove the dominance of the multiresolution methodology, and specifically, concatenating or linearly transforming via a learnable layer the feature vectors of image patches from a high (20x) and low (10x) magnification factors achieve improved performance for all prediction tasks across domain-specific and imagenet-based features. On the contrary, the performance of uniresolution baseline models was not consistent across domain-specific and imagenet-based features. Moreover, we shed light on the inherent inconsistencies observed in models trained on whole-tissue-sections when validated against biopsy-based datasets. Despite these challenges, our findings underscore the superiority of multiresolution analysis over uniresolution methods. Finally, cross-scale analysis also benefits the explainability aspects of attention-based architectures, since one can extract attention maps at the tissue- and cell-levels, improving the interpretation of the model's decision.

Ki67 has potential clinical importance in breast cancer but has yet to see broad acceptance due to inter-laboratory variability. Here we tested an open source and calibrated automated digital image analysis (DIA) platform to: (i) investigate the comparability of Ki67 measurement across corresponding core biopsy and resection specimen cases, and (ii) assess section to section differences in Ki67 scoring. Two sets of 60 previously stained slides containing 30 core-cut biopsy and 30 corresponding resection specimens from 30 estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer patients were sent to 17 participating labs for automated assessment of average Ki67 expression. The blocks were centrally cut and immunohistochemically (IHC) stained for Ki67 (MIB-1 antibody). The QuPath platform was used to evaluate tumoral Ki67 expression. Calibration of the DIA method was performed as in published studies. A guideline for building an automated Ki67 scoring algorithm was sent to participating labs. Very high correlation and no systematic error (p= 0.08) was found between consecutive Ki67 IHC sections. Ki67 scores were higher for core biopsy slides compared to paired whole sections from resections (p≤ 0.001; median difference: 5.31%). The systematic discrepancy between core biopsy and corresponding whole sections was likely due to pre-analytical factors (tissue handling, fixation). Therefore, Ki67 IHC should be tested on core biopsy samples to best reflect the biological status of the tumor.

Ki67 has potential clinical importance in breast cancer but has yet to see broad acceptance due to inter-laboratory variability. Here we tested an open source and calibrated automated digital image analysis (DIA) platform to: (i) investigate the comparability of Ki67 measurement across corresponding core biopsy and resection specimen cases, and (ii) assess section to section differences in Ki67 scoring. Two sets of 60 previously stained slides containing 30 core-cut biopsy and 30 corresponding resection specimens from 30 estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer patients were sent to 17 participating labs for automated assessment of average Ki67 expression. The blocks were centrally cut and immunohistochemically (IHC) stained for Ki67 (MIB-1 antibody). The QuPath platform was used to evaluate tumoral Ki67 expression. Calibration of the DIA method was performed as in published studies. A guideline for building an automated Ki67 scoring algorithm was sent to participating labs. Very high correlation and no systematic error (p= 0.08) was found between consecutive Ki67 IHC sections. Ki67 scores were higher for core biopsy slides compared to paired whole sections from resections (p≤ 0.001; median difference: 5.31%). The systematic discrepancy between core biopsy and corresponding whole sections was likely due to pre-analytical factors (tissue handling, fixation). Therefore, Ki67 IHC should be tested on core biopsy samples to best reflect the biological status of the tumor.

Ki67, a nuclear proliferation-related protein, is heavily used in anatomic pathology but has not become a companion diagnostic or a standard-of-care biomarker due to analytic variability in both assay protocols and interpretation. The International Ki67 Working Group in breast cancer has published and has ongoing efforts in the standardization of the interpretation of Ki67, but they have not yet assessed technical issues of assay production representing multiple sources of variation, including antibody clones, antibody formats, staining platforms, and operators. The goal of this work is to address these issues with a new standardization tool. We have developed a cell line microarray system in which mixes of human Karpas 299 or Jurkat cells (Ki67+) with Sf9 (Spodoptera frugiperda) (Ki67-) cells are present in incremental standardized ratios. To validate the tool, six different antibodies, including both ready-to-use and concentrate formats from six vendors, were used to measure Ki67 proliferation indices using IHC protocols for manual (bench-top) and automated platforms. The assays were performed by three different laboratories at Yale and analyzed using two image analysis software packages, including QuPath and Visiopharm. Results showed statistically significant differences in Ki67 reactivity between each antibody clone. However, subsets of Ki67 assays using three clones performed in three different labs show no significant differences. This work shows the need for analytic standardization of the Ki67 assay and provides a new tool to do so. We show here how a cell line standardization system can be used to normalize the staining variability in proliferation indices between different antibody clones in a triple negative breast cancer cohort. We believe that this cell line standardization array has the potential to improve reproducibility among Ki67 assays and laboratories, which is critical for establishing Ki67 as a standard-of-care assay.

Ki67, a nuclear proliferation-related protein, is heavily used in anatomic pathology but has not become a companion diagnostic or a standard-of-care biomarker due to analytic variability in both assay protocols and interpretation. The International Ki67 Working Group in breast cancer has published and has ongoing efforts in the standardization of the interpretation of Ki67, but they have not yet assessed technical issues of assay production representing multiple sources of variation, including antibody clones, antibody formats, staining platforms, and operators. The goal of this work is to address these issues with a new standardization tool. We have developed a cell line microarray system in which mixes of human Karpas 299 or Jurkat cells (Ki67+) with Sf9 (Spodoptera frugiperda) (Ki67-) cells are present in incremental standardized ratios. To validate the tool, six different antibodies, including both ready-to-use and concentrate formats from six vendors, were used to measure Ki67 proliferation indices using IHC protocols for manual (bench-top) and automated platforms. The assays were performed by three different laboratories at Yale and analyzed using two image analysis software packages, including QuPath and Visiopharm. Results showed statistically significant differences in Ki67 reactivity between each antibody clone. However, subsets of Ki67 assays using three clones performed in three different labs show no significant differences. This work shows the need for analytic standardization of the Ki67 assay and provides a new tool to do so. We show here how a cell line standardization system can be used to normalize the staining variability in proliferation indices between different antibody clones in a triple negative breast cancer cohort. We believe that this cell line standardization array has the potential to improve reproducibility among Ki67 assays and laboratories, which is critical for establishing Ki67 as a standard-of-care assay.

Programmed death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) Immunohistochemistry (IHC) is the key FDA-approved predictive marker to identify responders to anti-PD1 axis drugs. Multiple PD-L1 IHC assays with various antibodies and cut points have been used in clinical trials across tumor types. Comparative performance characteristics of these assays have been extensively studied qualitatively but not quantitatively. Here we evaluate the use of a standardized PD-L1 Index tissue microarray (TMA) to objectively determine agreement between antibody assays for PD-L1 applying quantitative digital image analysis. Using a specially constructed Index TMA containing a panel of ten isogenic cell lines in triplicate, we tested identical but independently grown batches of isogenic cells to prove Index TMAs can be produced in large quantities and hence serve as a standardization tool. Then the Index TMAs were evaluated using quantitative immunofluorescence (QIF) to validate the TMA itself and also to compare antibodies including E1L3N, SP142 and SP263. Next, an inter-laboratory and inter-assay comparison of 5 PD-L1 chromogenic IHC assays (US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved and lab developed test (LDT)) were performed at 12 sites around the USA. As previously reported, the SP142 FDA assay failed to detect low levels of PD-L1 in cell lines distinguished by the other four assays. The assays for 22C3 FDA, 28-8-FDA, SP263 FDA, and E1L3N LDT were highly similar across sites and all laboratories showed a high consistency over time for all assays using this Index TMA. In conclusion, we were able to objectively quantify PD-L1 expression on a standardized Index TMA using digital image analysis and we confirmed previous subjective assessments of these assays, but now in a multi-institutional setting. We envision commercial use of this Index TMA or similar smaller version as a useful standardization mechanism to compare results between institutions and to identify abnormalities while running routine clinical samples.

Programmed death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) Immunohistochemistry (IHC) is the key FDA-approved predictive marker to identify responders to anti-PD1 axis drugs. Multiple PD-L1 IHC assays with various antibodies and cut points have been used in clinical trials across tumor types. Comparative performance characteristics of these assays have been extensively studied qualitatively but not quantitatively. Here we evaluate the use of a standardized PD-L1 Index tissue microarray (TMA) to objectively determine agreement between antibody assays for PD-L1 applying quantitative digital image analysis. Using a specially constructed Index TMA containing a panel of ten isogenic cell lines in triplicate, we tested identical but independently grown batches of isogenic cells to prove Index TMAs can be produced in large quantities and hence serve as a standardization tool. Then the Index TMAs were evaluated using quantitative immunofluorescence (QIF) to validate the TMA itself and also to compare antibodies including E1L3N, SP142 and SP263. Next, an inter-laboratory and inter-assay comparison of 5 PD-L1 chromogenic IHC assays (US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved and lab developed test (LDT)) were performed at 12 sites around the USA. As previously reported, the SP142 FDA assay failed to detect low levels of PD-L1 in cell lines distinguished by the other four assays. The assays for 22C3 FDA, 28-8-FDA, SP263 FDA, and E1L3N LDT were highly similar across sites and all laboratories showed a high consistency over time for all assays using this Index TMA. In conclusion, we were able to objectively quantify PD-L1 expression on a standardized Index TMA using digital image analysis and we confirmed previous subjective assessments of these assays, but now in a multi-institutional setting. We envision commercial use of this Index TMA or similar smaller version as a useful standardization mechanism to compare results between institutions and to identify abnormalities while running routine clinical samples.

Ki67 expression has been a valuable prognostic variable in breast cancer, but has not seen broad adoption due to lack of standardization between institutions. Automation could represent a solution. Here we investigate the reproducibility of Ki67 measurement between three image analysis platforms with supervised classifiers performed by the same operator, by multiple operators, and finally we compare their accuracy in prognostic potential. Two breast cancer patient cohorts were used for this study. The standardization was done with the 30 cases of ER+ breast cancer that were used in phase 3 of International Ki67 in Breast Cancer Working Group initiatives where blocks were centrally cut and stained for Ki67. The outcome cohort was from 149 breast cancer cases from the Yale Pathology archives. A tissue microarray was built from representative tissue blocks with median follow-up of 120 months. The Mib-1 antibody (Dako) was used to detect Ki67 (dilution 1:100). HALO (IndicaLab), QuantCenter (3DHistech), and QuPath (open source software) digital image analysis (DIA) platforms were used to evaluate Ki67 expression. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to measure reproducibility. Between-DIA platform reproducibility was excellent (ICC: 0.933, CI: 0.879–0.966). Excellent reproducibility was found between all DIA platforms and the reference standard Ki67 values of Spectrum Webscope (QuPath-Spectrum Webscope ICC: 0.970, CI: 0.936–0.986; HALO-Spectrum Webscope ICC: 0.968, CI: 0.933–0.985; QuantCenter-Spectrum Webscope ICC: 0.964, CI: 0.919–0.983). All platforms showed excellent intra-DIA reproducibility (QuPath ICC: 0.992, CI: 0.986–0.996; HALO ICC: 0.972, CI: 0.924–0.988; QuantCenter ICC: 0.978, CI: 0.932–0.991). Comparing each DIA against outcome, the hazard ratios were similar. The inter-operator reproducibility was particularly high (ICC: 0.962–0.995). Our results showed outstanding reproducibility both within and between-DIA platforms, including one freely available DIA platform (QuPath). We also found the platforms essentially indistinguishable with respect to prediction of breast cancer patient outcome. Results justify multi-institutional DIA studies to assess clinical utility.

Ki67 expression has been a valuable prognostic variable in breast cancer, but has not seen broad adoption due to lack of standardization between institutions. Automation could represent a solution. Here we investigate the reproducibility of Ki67 measurement between three image analysis platforms with supervised classifiers performed by the same operator, by multiple operators, and finally we compare their accuracy in prognostic potential. Two breast cancer patient cohorts were used for this study. The standardization was done with the 30 cases of ER+ breast cancer that were used in phase 3 of International Ki67 in Breast Cancer Working Group initiatives where blocks were centrally cut and stained for Ki67. The outcome cohort was from 149 breast cancer cases from the Yale Pathology archives. A tissue microarray was built from representative tissue blocks with median follow-up of 120 months. The Mib-1 antibody (Dako) was used to detect Ki67 (dilution 1:100). HALO (IndicaLab), QuantCenter (3DHistech), and QuPath (open source software) digital image analysis (DIA) platforms were used to evaluate Ki67 expression. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to measure reproducibility. Between-DIA platform reproducibility was excellent (ICC: 0.933, CI: 0.879–0.966). Excellent reproducibility was found between all DIA platforms and the reference standard Ki67 values of Spectrum Webscope (QuPath-Spectrum Webscope ICC: 0.970, CI: 0.936–0.986; HALO-Spectrum Webscope ICC: 0.968, CI: 0.933–0.985; QuantCenter-Spectrum Webscope ICC: 0.964, CI: 0.919–0.983). All platforms showed excellent intra-DIA reproducibility (QuPath ICC: 0.992, CI: 0.986–0.996; HALO ICC: 0.972, CI: 0.924–0.988; QuantCenter ICC: 0.978, CI: 0.932–0.991). Comparing each DIA against outcome, the hazard ratios were similar. The inter-operator reproducibility was particularly high (ICC: 0.962–0.995). Our results showed outstanding reproducibility both within and between-DIA platforms, including one freely available DIA platform (QuPath). We also found the platforms essentially indistinguishable with respect to prediction of breast cancer patient outcome. Results justify multi-institutional DIA studies to assess clinical utility. This study shows excellent reproducibility among 3 different digital image (DIA) analysis platforms in Ki67 scoring. An outstanding concordance was found among four operators using the same calibrated DIA platform suggesting a highly reproducible Ki67 scoring method. Finally, the authors also found that all three DIA platforms were essentially indistinguishable with respect to prediction of breast cancer patient outcome.

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.Despite great enthusiasm towards immunotherapy, reliable biomarkers are still lacking. The importance of subsets based on human papillomavirus (HPV) status is supported by a growing body of evidence. However, role of other possible subgroups such as anatomic localization of primary tumor remains controversial. Our objective was to investigate immune cell infiltrate and checkpoint inhibitor proteins in above-mentioned head and neck cancer subsets. Archival tumor samples of 106 laryngeal, oropharyngeal, and hypopharyngeal cancer patients were stained with PD-L1, PD-L2, PD-1, and CTLA-4 antibodies. Proportion of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes was assessed as well. In HPV-negative tumors, PD-L1 immune cell positivity was associated with better disease-specific survival. PD-L1 expression on immune cells correlated with improved disease-specific survival in laryngeal tumors. Furthermore, PD-L1 immune cell positivity correlated with CTLA-4 expression on immune cells and it was accompanied by high tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte rate. PD-L1 expression on tumor cells and PD-1 status showed strong correlation in all patients and in oropharyngeal and laryngeal localization, but not in hypopharynx. HPV-negative oropharyngeal cancers showed negative PD-L1 status on tumor cells. CTLA-4 positivity was observed in 49.5% and 20.6% on immune cells and on tumor cells, respectively. We concluded that PD-L1 expression on immune cells indicates better prognosis in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma and in HPV-negative head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. We have not found any essential differences between anatomic subgroups. A possibly distinct role of hypopharyngeal localization regarding immune activity requires further clarification.

In this review we briefly discuss the possible biomarkers of prostate cancer among them we focus and analyze the relevance of TMPRSS2-ERG fusion gene in line with ERG expression in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Starting at diagnosis and genetic alterations in prostate carcinomas, we examine the incidence and detection of the most common genetic aberration in this tumor and its protein product as well. We also examined the correlation of clinicopathological factors and prognosis with ERG and the TMPRSS2-ERG fusion oncogene and ERG expression as predictive markers.