Search

Objective: Robot-assisted minimally invasive coronary bypass surgery is one of the least invasive approaches that offers multivessel revascularization and accelerated recovery. We investigated the benefits of computed tomography angiography (CTA) guidance in robotic coronary bypass (RCAB) by analyzing perioperative outcomes.Methods: Between April 2022 and April 2023, 60 consecutive patients who underwent RCAB under preoperative CTA guidance were included. The intercostal space of the minithoractomy incision was determined based on the distance from the thoracotomy site to the midsection of the left anterior descending artery (LAD) on preoperative CTA. Peripheral vascular findings on preoperative CTA guided the decision for the cannulation site. Perioperative parameters and early outcomes were evaluated.Results: The mean age of the patients was 62.3 ± 10.5 years, and 51 patients were male (85.0%). The mean number of revascularized vessels was 2.9 ± 1.1. Left thoracotomy guided by CTA measurements was performed in the fourth intercostal space in 37 patients (61.7%) and in the third intercostal space in the remaining patients. Axillary cannulation was performed in 28 (46.7%) patients because of prohibitive findings in the iliac vessels and aorta. All target coronary arteries with an indication for bypass were revascularized with CTA-guided RCAB. The left internal mammary artery (LIMA) was anastomosed to the LAD in all patients, and the LIMA was anastomosed sequentially to the diagonal artery in 17 patients (28.3%). No operative mortality or cerebrovascular event was observed. One patient underwent reoperation due to bleeding.Conclusions: Robot-assisted minimally invasive multiple-vessel coronary bypass under preoperative CTA guidance is safe and can be performed with excellent results.

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the outcomes of robotic mitral valve surgery with and without concomitant tricuspid valve surgery.Methods: Patients who underwent robotic mitral surgery between March 2010 and September 2022 were included. Patients were grouped according to the presence of concomitant tricuspid interventions. The groups were compared for baseline factors, operative parameters, and early postoperative outcomes. Age- and gender-matched groups were also compared for outcomes.Results: The study included 285 robotic mitral surgery patients. There were 59 patients who underwent concomitant tricuspid interventions. In the concomitant tricuspid surgery group, cardiopulmonary bypass time (150.1 vs 128.4 min, P< 0.001) and cross-clamp time (99.2 vs 82.4 min, P< 0.001) were longer. Prolonged intubation was more frequent in the concomitant tricuspid intervention group (5.2% vs 0.5%, P= 0.029). The groups did not differ in terms of mortality, permanent pacemaker (PPM) requirement, or other morbidities. Perioperative outcomes were similar after matched group analysis.Conclusions: Operative mortality and early adverse outcomes did not increase with the addition of tricuspid intervention in our cohort of robotic mitral surgery patients. The robotic approach for mitral disease and coexisting tricuspid disease may offer safe results without an increased risk of postoperative PPM requirement.