Search

Objective:To investigate reliability and changes of in-shoe plantar pressure and shear during walking at three cadences with two insole designs. This was a precursor to the investigation of plantar loading in people with diabetes for potential foot ulcer prevention.Method:A sensorised insole system, capable of measuring plantar pressure and shear at the heel, fifth metatarsal head (5MH), first metatarsal head (1MH) and hallux, was tested with ten healthy participants during level walking. Reliability was evaluated, using intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC), while varying the cadences and insole types. Percentage changes in pressure and shear relative to values obtained at self-selected cadence with a flat insole design were investigated.Results:Mean±standard deviation of maximum pressure, medial–lateral and anterior–posterior shear of up to 380±24kPa, 46±2kPa and –71±4kPa, respectively, were measured. The ICC in ranges of 0.762–0.973, 0.758–0.987 and 0.800–0.980 were obtained for pressure, anterior–posterior and medial–lateral shear, respectively. Opposite anterior–posterior shear directions between 5MH and 1MH (stretching), and between 1MH and hallux (pinching) were observed for some participants. Increasing cadence increased pressure and anterior–posterior shear (by up to +77%) but reduced medial–lateral shear at the heel and hallux (by up to –34%). Slower cadence increased anterior–posterior shear (+114%) but decreased medial–lateral shear (–46%) at the hallux. The use of a flexible contoured insole resulted in pressure reduction at the heel and 5MH but an increase in anterior–posterior shear at the heel (+69%) and hallux (+75%).Conclusion:The insole system demonstrated good reliability and is comparable to reported pressure-only systems. Pressure measurements were sensitive to changes in cadence and insole designs in ways that were consistent with the literature. However, our plantar shear showed localised shear changes with cadences and insoles for the first time, as well as stretching and pinching effects on plantar tissue. This opens new possibilities to investigate plantar tissue viability, loading characteristics and orthotic designs aimed towards foot ulcer prevention.

Study design: Cohort observational study. Objectives: To examine the movement profiles of individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) during their inpatient rehabilitative phase using continuous pressure monitoring (CPM), evaluating the trends in those with skin damage. Setting: SCI specialist rehabilitation centre in the United Kingdom. Methods: Individuals with SCI (n= 12) were assessed using CPM in the bed and chair over a 24–72 h. Pressure data was used as a surrogate for movement using both nursing interpretation and an intelligent algorithm. Clinical features were obtained including participants age, injury level, ASIA score, co-morbidities and prescribed support surfaces. Trends between movement profiles (frequency and intervals), SCI demographics and observed skin damage were assessed using cross-tabulation and histograms. Results: The data revealed significant correlations (p< 0.05) between the nursing observation and algorithm for predicting movement, although the algorithm was more sensitive. Individuals with high level injuries (C1-T6) were observed to have a lower frequency of movement and larger intervals between movements when compared to low level injuries (T7-L5) during both lying and sitting periods. The individuals observed to have skin damage were predominantly those who had both a low frequency of movement and extended gaps between movements. Conclusions: Movements for pressure relief in both the bed and chair environments were dependent on the level of injury in individuals with SCI during their inpatient rehabilitation. Distinct movement patterns corresponded with those who acquired skin damage, revealing the potential clinical applications for technologies to monitor PU risk and inform personalised care.

Despite the reported high prevalence of skin damage in neonatal units, little is known regarding assessment and management of neonatal skin.

Mechanical coupling at the interface between lower limb residua and prosthetic sockets plays an important role in assessing socket fitting and tissue health. However, most research lab–based lower limb prosthetic simulators to-date have implemented a rigid socket coupling. This study describes the fabrication and implementation of a lower limb residuum/socket interface simulator, designed to reproduce the forces and moments present during the key loading phases of amputee walking. An artificial residuum made with model bones encased in silicone was used, mimicking the compliant mechanical loading of a real residuum/socket interface. A 6-degree-of-freedom load cell measured the overall kinetics, having previously been incorporated into an amputee’s prosthesis to collect reference data. The developed simulator was compared to a setup where a rigid pylon replaced the artificial residuum. A maximum uniaxial load of 850 N was applied, comparable to the peak vertical ground reaction force component during amputee walking. Load cell outputs from both pylon and residuum setups were compared. During weight acceptance, when including the artificial residuum, compression decreased by 10%, while during push off, sagittal bending and anterior–posterior shear showed a 25% increase and 34% decrease, respectively. Such notable difference by including a compliant residuum further highlighted the need for such an interface simulator. Subsequently, the simulator was adjusted to produce key load cell outputs briefly aligning with those from amputee walking. Force sensing resistors were deployed at load bearing anatomic locations on the residuum/socket interface to measure pressures and were compared to those cited in the literature for similar locations. The development of such a novel simulator provides an objective adjunct, using commonly available mechanical test machines. It could potentially be used to provide further insight into socket design, fit and the complex load transfer mechanics at the residuum/socket interface, as well as to evaluate the structural performance of prostheses.

The study was designed to establish a biomechanical assessment platform for the lower limb residuum/socket interface as a function of duration and speed of movement. The approach exploits an interface sensor which measures multi-directional stresses at the interface. The corresponding interface coupling motion was assessed using a 3D motion capture system. A longitudinal study, involving a trans-femoral amputee, was conducted with nine repeated level walking sessions over a 12-month period. The effect of walking speed on interface biomechanics was also assessed. Interface peak pressures and shear stresses in the range of 55–59 kPa and 12–19 kPa were measured, respectively, over all sessions in the 12 months study period at the posterior-proximal location of the residuum. The peak pressure and longitudinal shear values were found to fluctuate approximately 11% and 40% as against its maximum value, respectively, over 12 months. In addition, up to 12° of angular coupling and up to 28 mm of pistoning were recorded over a gait cycle, which was found to change by 29% and 45% respectively over the study period. The variation in walking speed, by altering self-selected cadence, resulted in changes of pressure and shear stresses at mid-stance of the gait cycle. In particular, as compared with self-selected cadence, for fast speed, peak pressure and peak longitudinal shear stress decreased by 5% and 33%, respectively. For slow speed, peak pressure and peak longitudinal shear stress increased by 7% and 17%, respectively. The corresponding angular and pistoning revealed a variation of up to 29% and 45%, respectively. This biomechanical assessment approach shows promise in the quantitative assessment of interface kinematics and kinetics for lower limb prosthetics, the usage of which could assist the clinical assessment of prosthetic socket fit.

MILANO 10 A.M. ART Corso San Gottardo, 5 Tel: 02 9288 9164 info@10amart.it www.10amart.it Tues.-Fri. 10-12:30, 2-6 Until December 16 MANUEL FOIS: Between 99HFD3L and P023ESB A ARTE INVERNIZZI Via [...]

spain galeria elba benitez San Lorenzo 11, 28004 Madrid Tel: +34 913 08 04 68 Fax: +34 913 10 01 69 E-mail: info@elbabenitez.com Web: www.elbabenitez.com Instagram: @galeria_elba_benitez Until Nov 13 [...]